scholarly journals Leadless Pacemaker and Temporary Transvenous Wire Entanglement Requiring Percutaneous Extraction

Author(s):  
Abdullah M. Pervaiz ◽  
Anis John Kadado ◽  
Arvind K. Sundaram ◽  
Sudhir N. Reddy ◽  
Ashequl Islam
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Fichtner ◽  
Heidi L Estner ◽  
Michael Näbauer ◽  
Jörg Hausleiter

Abstract Background  Leadless pacemaker implantation rates are increasing worldwide. Until now leadless pacemaker dislocation and extraction has been rarely reported. Case summary  An 83-year-old patient with cardiac amyloidosis, chronic atrial fibrillation, and complete heart block was implanted with a leadless pacemaker (Micra, Medtronic). On the day after implantation, the device showed an exit block and on cardiac echocardiography and cardiac computer tomography, a device dislocation could be detected. During the day, the device moved at least three times between the tricuspid valve and the right ventricular apex. Each time causing non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. At the next day device extraction was scheduled. After 189 minutes of procedure time, it was possible to retrieve the device with the help of two steerable introducers (Agilis) and two snare catheters. Discussion  Implantable transcatheter leadless pacemakers can be implanted safely most of the time. However, in rare cases device dislocations may occur. Device extraction is possible, but is described as challenging in most published cases


2019 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 72-77
Author(s):  
Christoph Edlinger ◽  
Vera Paar ◽  
Thomas Tuscher ◽  
Peter Jirak ◽  
Lukas J. Motloch ◽  
...  

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. S204
Author(s):  
Ashwani Gupta ◽  
Muhammad Zubair Khan ◽  
Steven P. Kutalek

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 1738-1742
Author(s):  
Gianfranco Mitacchione ◽  
Marco Schiavone ◽  
Alessio Gasperetti ◽  
Diego Ruggiero ◽  
Marialessia Denora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Moghniuddin Mohammed ◽  
Amit Noheria ◽  
Seth Sheldon ◽  
Madhu Reddy

Introduction: There are no randomized controlled trials that compared the outcomes of leadless pacemaker (L-PPM) implantation with transvenous pacemaker (TV-PPM) and there is scarcity of data on real world outcomes. Methods: We queried National Inpatient Sample to identify all adult patients who had primary discharge diagnosis of conduction disorders or tachy-arrhythmias and excluded patients who had a concomitant procedure for valve replacement, coronary artery bypass grafting, ablation and/or cardiac implantable electronic device removal so that complications can be attributed to the pacemaker implantation. We included only procedures from November 2016 to December 2017 as Micra was the only available L-PPM during that period. For the comparison cohort we selected patients, during the same time period, who had a procedure code for single chamber pacemaker implantation in conjunction with right ventricular lead placement. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching and the variables used for matching are marked with asterisk in Table 1. All the codes used to identify complications has been previously validated from the Micra Post-approval registry and Coverage with Evidence Study. Results: Total of 1,305 patients for L-PPM and 13,905 patients in the TV-PPM group were included. Baseline characteristics with standardized mean difference before and after matching are shown in Table 1. Briefly, patients in L-PPM group were younger but had higher co-morbidities compared to TV-PPM group. The complications before and after matching are shown in Table 2. Conclusions: In conclusion, we found no significant difference between in-hospital complications after propensity score matching, with the exception of deep venous thrombosis. There was no difference between length of stay but cost for L-PPM was significantly higher. In this real-world analysis, we found that the leadless PPM implantation is safe in comparison to transvenous PPM.


1978 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. 1438 ◽  
Author(s):  
RICHARD G. FISHER ◽  
KENNETH L. MATTOX

EP Europace ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. i99-i99
Author(s):  
Vivek Y. Reddy ◽  
Derek V Exner ◽  
Imran Niazi ◽  
Rajesh Banker ◽  
Ning Yan Gu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document