92. Characteristics and Outcomes of Deep Brain Stimulation Device Related Infections: Experience from Quaternary Centers

Background Increasing use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) over the past 20 years is paralleled by a rise in DBS infections. There is a paucity of data on the diagnosis, management, and outcomes in such infections. We describe our center’s experience with DBS infections. Methods Adults ( >18 years) diagnosed with DBS associated infection between January 1, 2000 and May 1, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Data on patient demographics, clinical presentation, microbiology, and management was collected. Results Seventy cases were identified (table 1). The mean age at diagnosis was 58.9 ± 16.5 years. The bulk were free of comorbidities. Parkinson’s disease and essential tremors were the most common indications for DBS placement. The median time from implantation to infection was 4 months [IQR 1,24]. The neurotransmitter and extension wires were the most frequently infected parts. A microbiological diagnosis was made in 89% of cases, 47% of which were polymicrobial. The most commonly identified organisms were Staphylococcus aureus, Cutibacterium acnes, and coagulase-negative staphylococci. For patients with deep infection, 71% had complete device extraction, 20% partial extraction, and 9% device retention; clinical cure at 3 months occurred in 97%, 64% and 100%, respectively (figure 1). On the other hand, 93% of patients with superficial infection had device retention; cure at 3 months was seen in 64% (figure 2). Suppressive oral antibiotics were rarely used, 45% of patients with partial extraction and 26% with device retention. DBS was reimplanted in 71% of patients after complete extraction and led to reinfection in 30% at 1 year follow up. Median time to reimplantation was 2.7 months. All patients who failed at 3 months in the partial extraction and device retention cohorts subsequently underwent complete device removal leading to clinical cure sustained at 1 year follow up. Conclusion All patients who had complete extraction achieved clinical cure at 3-months follow-up, while high failure rates occurred in those with device retention. Most infections were polymicrobial and predominantly caused by gram-positive pathogens. Thirty percent of patients with re-implantation after complete device extraction developed re-infection within 1 year. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

57. Evaluation of the 2019 European Heart Rhythm Association International Consensus Document in Patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices Who Develop Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

Background Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation has markedly increased over the past two decades. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) occurs in patients with CIED and determination of device infection among patients without clinical findings of pocket site infection is often difficult. Our study examines the characteristics, management, and outcomes of SAB in patients living with CIED using 2019 international criteria to define CIED infection. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of patients with CIED who were hospitalized at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, with SAB from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2019. Patients who met CIED infection criteria following SAB based on the 2019 European Heart Rhythm Association International Concensus Document were identified. A time-to-event analysis was used to determine the impact, if any, of complete device extraction on outcomes. Results Overall, 110 patients with CIED developed SAB and 92 (83.6%) of them underwent transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE). Eighty-eight (80%) had CIED infection with 57 (51.8%) and 31 (28.2%) patients meeeting criteria for definite and possible CIED infections, respectively. Forty-three (75.4%) patients with definite CIED infection underwent complete device extraction. For possible and rejected CIED infection, the rates of complete device extraction were 35.5% and 27.3%, respectively (p< .001 for each). The primary endpoint of a composite of one-year mortality and SAB relapse had a rate that was significantly lower in patients with CIED infection who underwent complete device extraction as compared to that of patients who did not undergo device extraction (25.9% vs. 76.5%, p< .001). No significant difference in outcomes was seen in the rejected CIED infection group (33.3% vs. 62.5%, p =.27). Conclusion The rate of CIED infections following SAB was higher than that reported previously. Increased use of TEE and a novel case definition with broader diagnostic criteria were likely operative, in part, in accounting for the the higher rate of CIED infections complicating SAB. Complete device removal is critical in patients with either definite or possible CIED infection as defined by the 2019 consensus document to improve one-year mortality and SAB relapse rates. Disclosures Larry M. Baddour, MD, Boston Scientific (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Botanix Pharmaceuticals (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Roivant Sciences (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant Muhammad R. Sohail, MD, Medtronic (Consultant)Philips (Consultant)

Check the Need–Prevalence and Outcome after Transvenous Cardiac Implantable Electric Device Extraction without Reimplantation

Background: after transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of cardiac implantable electric devices (CIEDs), some patients may not benefit from device reimplantation. This study sought to analyse predictors and long-term outcome of patients after TLE with vs. without reimplantation in a high-volume centre. Methods: all patients undergoing TLE at our centre between January 2010 and November 2015 were included into this analysis. Results: a total of 223 patients (median age 70 years, 22.0% female) were included into the study. Cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) was the most common device (40.4%) followed by pacemaker (PM) (31.4%), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (26.9%), and cardiac resynchronization therapy-PM (CRT-P) (1.4%). TLE was performed due to infection (55.6%), malfunction (35.9%), system upgrade (6.7%) or other causes (1.8%). In 14.8%, no reimplantation was performed after TLE. At a median follow-up of 41 months, no preventable arrhythmia-related events were documented in the no-reimplantation group, but 11.8% received a new CIED after 17–84 months. While there was no difference in short-term survival, five-year survival was significantly lower in the no-reimplantation group (78.3% vs. 94.7%, p = 0.014). Conclusions: in patients undergoing TLE, a re-evaluation of the indication for reimplantation is safe and effective. Reimplantation was not related to preventable arrhythmia events, but all-cause survival was lower.

Relapsed Brucellosis Manifested as Endocarditis with Vegetation on the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Lead

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead endocarditis due to Brucella melitensis is a rare and life-threatening complication of brucellosis. Successful management requires a combination of medical treatment and device extraction. We present a case of relapsing brucellosis manifested as infective endocarditis colonizing the lead of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator with formation of vegetation on the lead. A 63-year-old male presented to the rehabilitation unit with hypotension. No other signs of infection were noted. The patient had a history of drinking unpasteurized milk since childhood and a previous episode of Brucella infective endocarditis. A transthoracic echocardiography showed an oscillating vegetation on the lead of the tip of the right atrial ICD, and the blood cultures were positive for Brucella melitensis. Surgical removal of the device was infeasible, and medical management was the only feasible option in this case.

Abstract 15979: Utility of Post-extraction Follow-up Blood Cultures in Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infection

Introduction: Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) infections are frequently complicated with bloodstream infection (BSI). Complete device removal and prolonged antimicrobial therapy is essential for cure. The frequency of persistent BSI after source control (device extraction) is not well described. This study aims to assess the utility of repeat blood cultures (BC) after device extraction as recommended by the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines. Methods: We selected patients who presented with BSI in the setting of CIED infection and underwent device removal at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 2012 and 2017. Cases where BC were not drawn prior to extraction, or repeated within 72 hours of device extraction, or met criteria for contamination were excluded. Results: Of 656 patients who underwent CIED extraction for device infection, 190 with post-extraction BC met study criteria. Among the final study cohort (Table 1), 159 patients had negative BC, while 31 had positive BC following CIED extraction. Pre-extraction, the most common causative organism was Staphylococcus aureus (91/190, 48%) (Figure 1a). Post-extraction, 22 of the 31 (71%) cases of persistent BSI were due to S. aureus (Fig 1b). The median duration of BSI was not significantly different between negative and positive BC groups (3 versus 4 days, p=0.92). Conclusions: Majority of patients had resolution of BSI after CIED extraction. S. aureus was the most common cause of persistent BSI post-extraction. Our findings support the AHA guidelines of repeating BC after device extraction, especially for S aureus .

Abstract 15746: Chlorhexidine Irrigation Without Capsulectomy After Device and Lead Extraction in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Device Infection

Introduction: Pocket management after device removal is unclear in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) infection. Capsulectomy has been proposed to reduce the risk of reinfection, this procedure is time consuming and requires extensive tissue debridement with a potential higher risk of hematoma formation. Hypothesis: The use of chlorhexidine and saline pocket irrigation without capsulectomy is effective in the management of CIED related infection. Methods: Patients who underwent transvenous lead extraction without capsulectomy for CIED-related infection were included. After complete hardware removal, thorough scrubbing of the generator pocket with 20 cc of 2% chlorhexidine followed by irrigation with 1L of saline was undertaken. The pocket was dried using sterile drapes and the wound was closed with separate intradermal absorbable suture. Implantation of a new CIED device and antibiotic treatment were given according to treating physicians’ discretion. Patients were followed up for 6 weeks after the procedure, and then every 6 months. Results: Between July 1 st , 2013 and May 1 st , 2019, 34 patients (68.1±10.6 years; 13 female) were included. Median follow-up was 745.5 days (IQ range 444.5-1418 days). Lead or device extrusion (41%) was the most frequent indication for extraction. Additionally, 38% of patients had endocarditis. In 75% of cases, bacteria were isolated from blood, pocket or lead tip cultures. Gram positive bacteria were the most frequently found organisms (59% of cases). In total, 19 patients (56%) had a new device implanted after the procedure; mean follow-up for this group of patients was 1251.1±678.8 days. Average time between device extraction and implant of a new device was 26 days, with 11 patients (32%) having device implant in the following week after extraction, including three patients (9%) who underwent dual chamber pacemaker immediately after lead extraction. There were no immediate or 30-day complications associated with chlorhexidine use. During follow-up, no patients presented recurrent infection. Conclusions: The use of chlorhexidine and saline pocket irrigation without capsulectomy offered excellent results with no cases of reinfection and without taking the risk of hematoma formation.

Abstract 15408: Risk Factors Associated With In-hospital Mortality for Cardiac Device Extraction

Introduction: Cardiac device extraction procedures are associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality. The objective of this study was to determine risk factors for in-hospital mortality of patients undergoing cardiac device extraction. Methods: We studied patients undergoing cardiac device removal between January 2016 and December 2019 at a single tertiary care center. Baseline patient characteristics, comorbidities, and preoperative laboratory data were obtained by database query (Table 1) . The outcome of interest was in-hospital death following cardiac device extraction. Odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) were used to measure relationships between exposures and the main outcome. Results: Our cohort consisted of 333 patients who underwent cardiac device extraction procedures. Cardiac device infection was the indication for procedure in 48% of patients (n=161). In-hospital mortality occurred in 9% of patients (n=29). Patients that died inpatient post-operatively were more likely to be male gender (OR 3.59, 95% CI [1.2, 10.6], p = 0.02), have acute kidney failure (OR 3.17, 95% CI [1.42, 7.05], p = 0.005), have anemia (OR 3.22, 95% CI [1.49, 6.99], p = 0.003), or have a diagnosis of severe malnutrition (OR 2.88, 95% CI [1.26, 6.58], p = 0.01). In a subgroup analysis, patients with diabetes undergoing extraction for infectious reasons had an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 4.36, 95% CI [1.54, 12.34], p = 0.005). Conclusion: Patients undergoing cardiac device extraction are high risk for in-hospital mortality. Patients experiencing in-hospital mortality were more likely to be male, have acute renal failure, anemia and severe malnutrition. Careful analysis of preoperative risk factors, laboratory data, and nutritional status can help stratify risk for patients and providers.