Why academics attend conferences? An extended career self-management framework

2020 ◽  
pp. 100793
Author(s):  
Karin Sanders ◽  
Maria L. Kraimer ◽  
Lindsey Greco ◽  
Frederick P. Morgeson ◽  
Pawan S. Budhwar ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 579-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lemi Baruh ◽  
Mihaela Popescu

This article looks at how the logic of big data analytics, which promotes an aura of unchallenged objectivity to the algorithmic analysis of quantitative data, preempts individuals’ ability to self-define and closes off any opportunity for those inferences to be challenged or resisted. We argue that the predominant privacy protection regimes based on the privacy self-management framework of “notice and choice” not only fail to protect individual privacy, but also underplay privacy as a collective good. To illustrate this claim, we discuss how two possible individual strategies—withdrawal from the market (avoidance) and complete reliance on market-provided privacy protections (assimilation)—may result in less privacy options available to the society at large. We conclude by discussing how acknowledging the collective dimension of privacy could provide more meaningful alternatives for privacy protection.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Malte Ackermann ◽  
Sabrina Schell ◽  
Susanne Kopp

PurposeFirms are challenged by digital transformation, as their organizational design is not up to par. Mercedes-Benz.io, a 100% subsidiary of Mercedes-Benz AG Daimler group, employs Holacracy, a self-management framework that abolishes traditional hierarchies in order to be more responsive to changes. This paper aims to explore how Mercedes-Benz.io utilizes Holacracy in order to address the challenges posed by digital transformation.Design/methodology/approachUsing qualitative expert interviews, the authors show that organizational life becomes more meaningful but also more engaging and demanding. The authors highlight that agile principles can be embedded in the organizational structure, a strong contrast to conventional management design. Decision-making authority and accountability is decentralized toward employees who face operational realities. This fosters commitment but might prolong the decision process. Leadership seems to be fairly contextual, and career paths are fundamentally different; development avenues are rather functional.FindingsThe authors conclude that Holacracy seems suitable for industries where the need for adaptability outweighs the need for reliability. It leads to increased transparency and accountability but is not a ready-made solution and requires ample resources.Originality/valueThis study is one of the first that qualitatively assess the changes, implications and outcomes of organizations that employ Holacracy.


Author(s):  
Nemanja Ignjatov ◽  
Milan Z. Bjelica ◽  
Mica Cetkovic ◽  
Sasa Radovanovic ◽  
Gordana Velikic

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document