scholarly journals Erratum on “Non-indolent mantle cell lymphoma at a single public hospital in Brazil: real world first-line treatment cohort study data”

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 194
Author(s):  
Sergio Augusto Buzian Brasil ◽  
Carolina Colaço ◽  
Tomas Barrese ◽  
Roberto P. Paes ◽  
Cristina Bortolheiro ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-97
Author(s):  
Sergio Augusto Buzian Brasil ◽  
Carolina Colaço ◽  
Tomas Barrese ◽  
Roberto P. Paes ◽  
Cristina Bortolheiro ◽  
...  

Haematologica ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 138-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rémy Gressin ◽  
Nicolas Daguindau ◽  
Adrian Tempescul ◽  
Anne Moreau ◽  
Sylvain Carras ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 2-2
Author(s):  
Morgane Cheminant ◽  
Martin Dreyling ◽  
Olivier Hermine

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-159
Author(s):  
KD Kaplanov ◽  
◽  
NP Volkov ◽  
TYu Klitochenko ◽  
AL Shipaeva ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1751-1751
Author(s):  
Carla Casulo ◽  
Augustine Iannotta ◽  
Jannelle Walkley ◽  
Craig H. Moskowitz ◽  
Alison J Moskowitz ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a heterogeneous disease and risk-stratification of patients (pts) for treatment is not performed routinely. For older pts ineligible for aggressive treatments, comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGA) are recommended but not routinely implemented into practice. Commonly used chemo-immunotherapeutic options result in low rates of complete remission (CR) (40%-50% bendamustine-rituximab; Rummel et al Lancet 2013; Flinn et al Blood 2014), with frequent relapses. Risk-stratification of older MCL pts through biological and clinical characteristics may improve treatment outcomes and reduce toxicity. Ofatumumab may have an advantage over rituximab given more efficient complement activation and complement dependent cytotoxicity. To test this we designed a phase II risk-stratified study of ofatumumab alone or in combination with bendamustine as first line treatment for elderly MCL with the goal of improved remission rates and extended survival. Methods: This was a single-institution phase II study. The primary objective was response. Eligible pts were 65 years of age or older with untreated MCL and/or ineligible for aggressive treatments such as high dose chemotherapy/autologous stem cell transplant. Patients were risk-stratified for therapy. Low risk pts with no GELF/NCCN criteria, low/intermediate risk MIPI, Ki-67 index < 30% and no blastic morphology received single agent ofatumumab weekly for 4 doses. High risk pts with GELF/NCCN criteria present, high risk MIPI, Ki-67 index > 30% or blastic morphology received ofatumumab and bendamustine (O-B) every 28 days for 6 cycles. A simon-two stage design was implemented requiring 6 of 12 pts to have a CR in the O-B arm to proceed. Pts receiving ofatumumab only were permitted to cross over to O-B for less than a partial response (PR) at restaging. Survival probability was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. CGA was performed prior to each cycle, and correlation to treatment toxicity was evaluated as a secondary endpoint. Results: Twenty pts in total were enrolled. Median age was 73 (range: 44-83). Seven pts (35%) were classified as low risk and received single agent ofatumumab. Thirteen pts (65%) were classified as high risk and received O-B. All patients in the O-B arm completed 6 cycles of treatment, all met GELF/NCCN criteria. Of these, 54% had high risk MIPI, 54% had Ki67 ≥30%. Among pts receiving single agent ofatumumab, 71% (5 pts) had < PR (stable disease), 1 had CR (14%), and 1 pt was not evaluable. Three pts with < PR crossed over to the O-B arm. Among 12/16 evaluable pts (3 too early, 1 withdrew) in the O-B arm; overall response rate was 92%; CR rate was 67%, PR rate 25%. One patient had stable disease (8%). After median follow-up of 1.8 years (range 0.1-2.6 years), overall survival in the entire group is 100%. Progression free survival at 2 yrs for the O-B arm is estimated at 68%. Both regimens were safe and well tolerated. Incidence of grade 3/4 serious adverse effects was 15% (3 of 22 patients), all in the O-B group. Baseline CGA identified patients as low (n=15) and medium risk (n=3) for grade 3/4 toxicity, with all three SAE (pneumonia, UTI, SVT) occurring in medium risk patients (p=0.001). Baseline timed-up and go showed a trend for anticipated toxicity for patients in the worst quartile (p=0.11). Conclusions: The combination of ofatumumab and bendamustine has promising activity in elderly pts with high risk MCL, with superior CR rates compared to historical chemo-immunotherapeutic regimens. Single agent ofatumumab had modest activity, but was safe in low risk pts and did not impact responses to chemoimmunotherapy. CGA assessment may help predict toxicity. Ofatumumab-bendamustine is effective as first line treatment for older pts with MCL and holds promise as a platform for combination with novel agents in prospective trials of untreated MCL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Off Label Use: Ofatumumab is an anti CD20 monocloncal antibody not approved for use in mantle cell lymphoma. Moskowitz:Genentech: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Zelenetz:Foundation Medicine, Inc: Consultancy. Hamlin:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1755-1755
Author(s):  
Marie-Pierre Gourin ◽  
Julie Abraham ◽  
Franck Trimoreau ◽  
Barbara Petit ◽  
Stephane Girault ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1755 Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has been identified since 1994 in the Revised-European-American classification of Lymphoid neoplasm's. It's a rare and aggressive subtype representing 5% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) with a poor prognosis and a median overall survival (OS) of 30 to 43 months (m) due to refractory disease or frequently relapse. Chemotherapies including anthracyclines as CHOP regimen with or without rituximab are often used in first line treatment. Promising results have been obtained since 1998 with regimens including cytarabine and followed by intensive therapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) for younger patients. Since 1999 we adopted a policy of treating MCL with regimens including this molecule: younger and grafting patients received DHAP and rituximab (R-DHAP) regimen followed by intensive therapy with ASCT. Patients fit and aged over 65 years received 6 cycles of R-DHAP. Unfit patients over 65 years received R-COP-cytarabine regimen and older unfit and frail patients received cytarabine by subcutaneous (SC) weekly injections. We report a retrospective observational study of 10 years experience in our department. Methods: From 09/1999 to 09/2009, we collect all cases of patients with a MCL diagnosis and treated by cytarabine regimen in our haematology department. All diagnosis was reviewed by pathologist and cytologist. We collected clinical, biological, histological, cytological, prognosis, therapeutic monitoring and survey data from the database of the regional structure of reference of lymphoma in Limousin in France. A descriptive and survival analysis was performed using Statview software. Results: During this period, we followed 54 patients with MCL, median age 70,5 [45-87], sex ratio 2,6. Diagnosis was performed on associations of the following samples: biopsie in 72,2% (n=39), bone marrow cytological aspect and immunophenotyping in 48,1% (n=26), blood cytological aspect and immunophenotyping in 70,4% (n=38). Cyclin D1 overexpression in molecular analysis was detected in 79,6% (n=43). Ann Arbor stage I/II 7,4% (n=4), III/IV 92,6% (n=50). ECOG 0/1 83,3% (n=45), ECOG 2 16,7% (n=9). MIPI score was Lower Risk (LR) for 25,9% (n=14), Intermediate Risk (IR) for 27,8% (n=15) and Higher Risk (HR) for 46,3% (n=25). Median OS is significantly different among the MIPI score (p<0,0021) with 37,7 months for HR versus 72,6 months for IR and not reached for LR. First line treatment were distributed among SC weekly injections of cytarabine 13% (n=7), COP+/−R-cytarabine for 25,9% (n=14) and DHAP+/−R for 61,1% (n=33). ASCT was performed for 29,6% (n=16) followed induction treatment by DHAP+/−R. Median OS and PFS are respectively 59,4 and 46,3 months for the total population. Patients received SC cytarabine have a median OS of 37,7 months and median PFS 27,3 months. Patients received COP+/−R-cytarabine have a median OS of 29,4 months and PFS 17,7 months. And patients received DHAP+/−R have not reached median OS and PFS. For patients received ASCT, median OS and PFS are not reached versus respectively 46,3 and 33,5 months for ungrafted patients. Median follow-up is 35,4 months [1-124,7] for all patients, 37,7 months [1,1-59,3] for patients treated by SC cytarabine, 18,1 months [2,6-81,9] for patients treated by COP+/−R-cytarabine and 39,8 months [1-124,7] for patients treated by DHAP+/−R. Conclusion: The MIPI score was calculated a posteriori and validated in our series of patients distinguishing three different populations with significantly different survival (p<0,0021). Since 10 years, we usually used cytarabine in first-line treatment of MCL. Cytarabine regimen is associated with other molecule and adapted by age, comorbidities and renal function. In real life, the use of this molecule seems provide interesting results in term of survival and PFS particularly for younger receiving dose intensified regimens by R-DHAP followed by intensive therapy with ASCT. Several clinical trials include now cytarabine in their therapeutic schemes. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document