scholarly journals Automation and Control of a Dissolved Air Flotation Pilot Plant

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 3911-3916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodolpho R. Fonseca ◽  
José P. Thompson, Jr. ◽  
Ivan C. Franco ◽  
Flávio V. da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Plant ◽  
Dissolved Air Flotation ◽  
Automation And Control ◽  
Air Flotation ◽  
And Control ◽  
Dissolved Air

Optimising dissolved air flotation/filtration treatment of algae-laden lagoon effluent using surface charge: a Bolivar treatment plant case study

2012 ◽  
Vol 66 (8) ◽  
pp. 1684-1690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell Yap ◽  
Michael Holmes ◽  
William Peirson ◽  
Michael Whittaker ◽  
Richard Stuetz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Surface Charge ◽  
Wastewater Treatment Plant ◽  
Pilot Plant ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Dissolved Air Flotation ◽  
Air Flotation ◽  
A Charge ◽  
Dissolved Air

Dissolved air flotation (DAF) incorporating filtration (DAFF) is used at the Bolivar wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) to polish lagoon effluent for reuse. Elevated algal populations are frequently experienced and can lead to increased coagulant requirements and process control issues. Streaming current detectors (SCDs) and a charge demand analyser (CDA) were used to monitor the full-scale plant. This was followed by an optimisation study using a pilot plant with a CDA. It was found that the normal operational charge demand range for DAF at Bolivar was between −46 and −40 μeq L−1. Decreasing the pH of coagulation reduced coagulant consumption and facilitated more sensitive CDA responses to changes in alum dose.

Counter-current dissolved air flotation/filtration

1995 ◽  
Vol 31 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 173-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Eades ◽  
W. J. Brignall
Keyword(s):  
Water Treatment ◽  
Pilot Plant ◽  
Volume Flow Rate ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Particulate Material ◽  
Water Utilities ◽  
Dissolved Air Flotation ◽  
Air Flotation ◽  
Counter Current ◽  
Dissolved Air

Thames Water Utilities has developed and patented a Counter-current dissolved air flotation/filtration (COCO-DAFF) process as a compact water treatment system designed to remove particulate material from traditional water sources. In particular it has been developed to overcome operational problems with primary filters caused by seasonal blooms of filter blocking algae such as Melosira sp., Aphanizomenon sp. andAnabaena sp. The process can be run without flotation during periods when algae are not a problem, giving operational cost savings. This process differs from co-current dissolved air flotation in that the recycle water is introduced after the inlet structure, but above the filter media. This generates an even depth bubble blanket in the flotation tank through which all the flocculated water must pass. The advantages are that in moving the recycle inlet away from the flocculated water inlet the potential for floc damage by the recycle is eliminated. Also since the entire sludge blanket is supported by a deep, even, bubble blanket, on de-sludging any fall-out of sludge that occurs near the de-sludging weirs will have to go back down through the process, leading to subsequent re-floating, and a reduced potential for spiking of the floated turbidity. Process validation experiments have been carried out on a 1.4 Ml/d pilot plant based at the Kempton Advanced Water Treatment Centre, London. These tests have identified a required flocculation time of 15 minutes prior to counter-current flotation, and insensitivity to the depth of the air injection below top water level. Dissolved air distribution is achieved using a special high volume flow rate DAF nozzle designed to lower the number of nozzles required per unit area, and to maximise the spread of the bubble cloud for optimum bubble/particle contact. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been used in the scale-up of the pilot plant experience into the first full scale of this design plant to be built, by PWT Projects, at the 200 Ml/d Walton AWTW, for Thames Water Utilities.

Comparison of dissolved air flotation and direct filtration

1995 ◽  
Vol 31 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 113-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Ferguson ◽  
G. S. Logsdon ◽  
D. Curley
Keyword(s):  
South Carolina ◽  
Reservoir Water ◽  
Dissolved Air Flotation ◽  
Direct Filtration ◽  
Flotation Treatment ◽  
Treatment Train ◽  
Air Flotation ◽  
And Control ◽  
Iron And Manganese ◽  
Dissolved Air

Direct filtration with and without pre-ozone, and dissolved air flotation and filtration were evaluated for clarification of high quality reservoir water in Greenville, South Carolina, USA. Goals of the study included production of low turbidity filtered water and control of algae, iron and manganese, and disinfection by-product precursors. The dissolved air flotation treatment train gave much longer filter runs than direct filtration, when both processes met the 0.10 NTU goal for filtered water quality. Use of pre-ozone was beneficial for direct filtration. Removal of TOC, DBP precursors, and iron and manganese were similar for both processes.

Comparative performance of an electrocoagulation/flotation system with chemical coagulation/dissolved air flotation: a pilot-scale trial

2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 289-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.Q. Jiang ◽  
N.J.D. Graham ◽  
C.M. André ◽  
G.H. Kelsall ◽  
N.P. Brandon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Plant ◽  
Dose Range ◽  
Pilot Scale ◽  
Organic Content ◽  
Comparative Performance ◽  
Dissolved Air Flotation ◽  
Treatment Performance ◽  
Running Cost ◽  
Air Flotation ◽  
Dissolved Air

An electrocoagulation-flotation (ECF) pilot plant was designed, built and operated to evaluate its performance in comparison with a pilot scale conventional dissolved air flotation (DAF) system for treating lowland surface water in the UK. Treatment performance was assessed principally in terms of changes in dissolved organic content (DOC) and system running cost. On average, the decrease in DOC, UV-254 and colour was 10-15% with ECF at pH ca. 7.8 and current densities of 2-5 A m-2 (equivalent dose range of 1-5 gAl(III) m-3). Acidification of the influent (pH 8.4 down to 7.5) decreased only DOC and increased apparent current efficiencies for Al dissolution above unity. Passivation of the aluminium electrodes by Al(III) (hydrous) oxides caused difficulties in maintaining a steady dissolved Al(III) concentration and also increased specific electrical energy consumptions. Treated water quality with ECF was as good as that with DAF at lower equivalent coagulant doses (< 5 gAl(III) m-3), but was less so at higher coagulant doses. The pilot-plant DAF system appeared to be more expensive in terms of its running cost for the conditions used; the cost ratios of DAF to ECF were between 3:1 and 5:1, respectively, for an equivalent treatment performance.

Flow structures in a dissolved air flotation pilot tank and the influence on the separation of MBBR floc

2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lundh ◽  
L. Jönsson ◽  
J. Dahlquist
Keyword(s):  
Flow Structure ◽  
Removal Efficiency ◽  
Pilot Plant ◽  
Suspended Solids ◽  
Short Circuit ◽  
Flow Structures ◽  
Dissolved Air Flotation ◽  
Air Content ◽  
Air Flotation ◽  
Dissolved Air

The objective of the study was to find ways of improvement of the dissolved air flotation process by studying the flow structure. The paper presents experimental data on flow structures and the relation between the flow structure and the removal efficiency. Measurements have been performed in a pilot plant with an Acoustical Doppler Velocimeter. The water velocity was measured in a grid net, giving insight into the flow structure. The removal efficiency was analysed at Malmö wastewater treatment plant in Sweden. The pilot plant separated biological floc from a Kaldnes Moving Bio-Bed Reactor (MBBR). The efficiency of the separation was analysed by measurements of suspended solids in the influent and the effluent. Air content was measured inside the tank and in the re-cycle. The result showed that basically two flow structures existed; the stratified and the short-circuit flow structure. The stratified flow structure seemed correlated to efficient separation of particles while the short-circuit flow structure seemed to have a negative effect, especially when the flow structure was affected by varying the re-cycle rate, i.e. the air content. Conclusively, the flow structure seemed to be correlated to type of flow structure. However, studies with higher concentration of suspended solids for verification were suggested.

Behaviour of air injection nozzles in dissolved air flotation

1995 ◽  
Vol 31 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 25-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Rykaart ◽  
J. Haarhoff
Keyword(s):  
Bubble Coalescence ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Initial Growth ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Dissolved Air Flotation ◽  
Nozzle Orifice ◽  
Pressure Release ◽  
Air Volume ◽  
Air Flotation ◽  
Dissolved Air

A simple two-phase conceptual model is postulated to explain the initial growth of microbubbles after pressure release in dissolved air flotation. During the first phase bubbles merely expand from existing nucleation centres as air precipitates from solution, without bubble coalescence. This phase ends when all excess air is transferred to the gas phase. During the second phase, the total air volume remains the same, but bubbles continue to grow due to bubble coalescence. This model is used to explain the results from experiments where three different nozzle variations were tested, namely a nozzle with an impinging surface immediately outside the nozzle orifice, a nozzle with a bend in the nozzle channel, and a nozzle with a tapering outlet immediately outside the nozzle orifice. From these experiments, it is inferred that the first phase of bubble growth is completed at approximately 1.7 ms after the start of pressure release.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document