For a good class, email: Technologically-mediated out-of-class communication and instructional outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 100761
Author(s):  
Kyle R. Vareberg ◽  
Zhenyang Luo ◽  
David Westerman ◽  
Melissa Bartels ◽  
Peter Lindmark
1978 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Gene Hoffman

The relevance of university student ratings, obtained using the Check-List of Instructional Characteristics, was assessed by examining relationships with potential contaminating factors (class size, presentation format, students’ initial interest, and personal impression of the instructor) and relationships with instructional outcomes (outcome interest, course performance, and self-reported learning). Data were analyzed for 115 varied courses, 75 mathematics classes, and 28 speech classes. Suggestions were made for controlling bias found to be associated with size, format, and initial interest. Student’s ratings of instructors’ Knowledge and Skill, and student’s Overall Satisfaction were related to student’s outcome interest. Results are discussed in light of inconsistencies of past research.


Author(s):  
Sandra Sutton Andrews ◽  
Mary Stokrocki ◽  
Angel Jannasch-Pennell ◽  
Samuel A. DiGangi

In this qualitative pilot study, the authors report on curriculum field trials within a personal learning environment (PLE) designed by a collaboration of academic researchers and nonprofit volunteers working together in the virtual world of Second Life. The purpose of the PLE is to provide learners less likely to have access to educational opportunities with a means to create a ‘new life’ in the real world, through a basic web-based curriculum and an advanced Second Life curriculum. Field trials of the Second Life curriculum were held with youth from underserved populations (n=6) to identify participant characteristics that facilitate success with the curriculum. Performance on instructional outcomes was examined in addition to a participatory action research methodology (PAR) that was employed with participants as co-researchers. To protect identities, the authors use a case study approach to track one composite participant/co-researcher through the curriculum.


1976 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald P. Hoyt ◽  
Ronald K. Spangler

1996 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Smylie ◽  
Virginia Lazarus ◽  
Jean Brownlee-Conyers

2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 486-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Sternberg ◽  
Elena L. Grigorenko ◽  
Li-fang Zhang

There are two styles of learning and thinking: ability based and personality based. The former are assessed by maximum-performance tests, and the latter are assessed by typical-performance tests. We argue that both kinds of styles matter for instruction and assessment in school. In particular, shaping lessons based on an awareness that people learn and think in different ways can lead to improved instructional outcomes. We describe one ability-based theory and one personality-based theory and present supporting data from multiple studies relevant to each.


Author(s):  
Heidi Julien

This study of library staff explores their experiences about their teaching roles in the context of information literacy instruction. The specific research question is: how do library staff with instructional roles experience and relate to those roles and what might be the implications of those self-understandings for instructional outcomes?Cette étude explore les expériences du personnel de bibliothèques et plus particulièrement leurs rôles éducationnels dans le contexte de l’enseignement de la culture informationnelle. La question spécifique de recherche est la suivante : Comment le personnel de bibliothèque ayant des rôles éducationnels à jouer expérimente et se situe par rapport à ces rôles et quels seraient les implications de cette prise de conscience en termes de retombées éducationnelles? 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document