Studies on air core size in a simplex pressure-swirl atomizer

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (29) ◽  
pp. 18649-18657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhilin Liu ◽  
Yong Huang ◽  
Lei Sun
Keyword(s):  
Core Size ◽  
Air Core ◽  
Swirl Atomizer ◽  
Pressure Swirl ◽  
Pressure Swirl Atomizer

scholarly journals 2D and 3D numerical modelling of internal flow of Pressure-swirl atomizer

2019 ◽  
Vol 213 ◽  
pp. 02055
Author(s):  
Milan Maly ◽  
Jaroslav Slama ◽  
Marcel Sapik ◽  
Jan Jedelsky
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Models ◽  
Internal Flow ◽  
Liquid Sheet ◽  
Spray Cone ◽  
Air Core ◽  
Swirl Velocity ◽  
Swirl Atomizer ◽  
Pressure Swirl ◽  
2D And 3D ◽  
Pressure Swirl Atomizer

This paper compares 2D axisymmetric and 3D numerical models used to predict the internal flow of a pressure-swirl atomizer using a commercial software Ansys Fluent 18.1. The computed results are compared with experimental data in terms of spray cone angle (SCA), discharge coefficient (CD), internal air-core dimensions and swirl velocity profile. The swirl velocity was experimentally studied using a Laser Doppler Anemometry in a scaled transparent model of the atomizer. The internal air-core was visualized at high temporal and spatial resolution by a high-speed camera with backlit illumination. The internal flow was numerically treated as transient two-phase flow. The gas-liquid interface was captured with Volume of Fluid scheme. The numerical solver used both laminar and turbulent approach. Turbulence was modelled using k-ε, k-ω, Reynolds Stress model (RSM) and coarse Large Eddy Simulation (LES). The laminar solver was capable to predict all the parameters with an error less than 5% compared with the experimental results in both 2D and 3D simulation. However, it overpredicted the velocity of the discharged liquid sheet. The LES model performed similarly to the laminar solver, but the liquid sheet velocity was 10% lower. The two-equation models k-ε and k-ω overpredicted the turbulence viscosity and the internal air-core was not predicted.

Effect of Dimensionless Numbers on Air Core Diameter of Pressure-Swirl Atomizer

2020 ◽  
Vol 899 ◽  
pp. 22-28
Author(s):  
Zulkifli Abdul Ghaffar ◽  
Salmiah Kasolang ◽  
Ahmad Hussein Abdul Hamid ◽  
Mohd Syazwan Firdaus Mat Rashid
Keyword(s):  
Performance Test ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Spray Angle ◽  
Dimensionless Numbers ◽  
Flow Area ◽  
Core Diameter ◽  
Air Core ◽  
Swirl Atomizer ◽  
Pressure Swirl ◽  
Pressure Swirl Atomizer

Air core is an important parameter in pressure swirl atomizer since formation of air core determines the thickness of the discharged liquid sheet and the effective flow area of nozzle discharge. This consequently will affect the coefficient of discharge and the spray angle. This study conducted for the investigation of the relation between dimensionless numbers on the air core diameter. Dimensionless numbers are helpful aid for the quantification of independent parameters involving atomizer design and operating conditions simultaneously. Reynolds number, Re and orifice-to-swirl chamber diameter ratio, N are the dimensionless numbers selected for this study. Despite of the availability of study on the effect of dimensionless numbers on air core diameter, more study requires especially for smaller N. An experimental test-rig was constructed to conduct the performance test of the atomizer. Acquired images were analyzed using image-processing software. It was found that N has more significant effect on the change of air core diameter compared to Re. However, it is observed that at Re = 40000, N = 0.07 produces almost similar air core diameter with N = 0.25 at Re < 20000. In contrast, with N = 0.5, air core diameter produces are larger even at Re < 20000. Hence, it can be concluded that both Re and N are important parameters in characterizing the air core diameter in pressure-swirl atomizer.

INTERNAL AND NEAR-NOZZLE FLOW OF A PRESSURE-SWIRL ATOMIZER UNDER VARIED FUEL TEMPERATURE

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 529-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seoksu Moon ◽  
Choongsik Bae ◽  
Essam F. Abo-Serie ◽  
Jaejoon Choi
Keyword(s):  
Nozzle Flow ◽  
Fuel Temperature ◽  
Swirl Atomizer ◽  
Pressure Swirl ◽  
Pressure Swirl Atomizer

Study of pressure swirl atomizer with tangential input at design point and outside of design point

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 127113
Author(s):  
Kiumars Khani Aminjan ◽  
Balaram Kundu ◽  
D. D. Ganji
Keyword(s):  
Design Point ◽  
Swirl Atomizer ◽  
Pressure Swirl ◽  
Pressure Swirl Atomizer

A Numerical Approach for the Simulation of Internal Nozzle Flow in a Pressure Swirl Atomizer Using Different Turbulent Models and Towards an Effective Inlet Weber Number

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmadreza Abbasi Baharanchi ◽  
Seckin Gokaltun ◽  
Shahla Eshraghi
Keyword(s):  
Weber Number ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Internal Flow ◽  
Numerical Approach ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Multiphase Model ◽  
Vof Model ◽  
Swirl Atomizer ◽  
Pressure Swirl ◽  
Pressure Swirl Atomizer

VOF Multiphase model is used to simulate the flow inside a pressure-swirl-atomizer. The capability of the Reynolds Stress Model and variants of the K-ε and K-ω models in modeling of turbulence has been investigated in the commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software FLUENT 6.3. The Implicit scheme available in the volume-of-fluid (VOF) model is used to calculate the interface representation between phases. The atomization characteristics have been investigated as well as the influence of the inlet swirl strength of the internal flow. The numerical results have been successfully validated against experimental data available for the computed parameters. The performance of the RNG K-ε model was found to be satisfactory in reducing the computational cost and introducing an effective Weber number for the flow simulated in this study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document