Online usability and patients with long-term conditions: A mixed-methods approach

2012 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 374-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans C. Ossebaard ◽  
Erwin R. Seydel ◽  
Lisette van Gemert-Pijnen
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. e48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Wook Kim ◽  
Jason Madan ◽  
Melina Dritsaki ◽  
Carol Bryce ◽  
Vera Forjaz ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1420326X2110398
Author(s):  
S. R. Jensen ◽  
C. Gabel ◽  
S. Petersen ◽  
P. H. Kirkegaard

The paper explores potentials for increasing residents' wellbeing in multi-family social housing (MSH) undergoing energy renovation. The renovation measures needed to reach national and global climate goals are often not financially feasible when viewed in isolation. Therefore, it is relevant to identify potentials for added value, which can justify more extensive measures. This paper is based on the hypothesis that every renovation project holds potentials for added value in terms of increased resident wellbeing. Further, that it is crucial to extend current understandings of wellbeing beyond single, quantitative wellbeing parameters in order to promote more holistic, long-term sustainable renovation solutions. The paper sheds light on potentials for increased resident wellbeing based on an analysis of residents’ experience and satisfaction with gestures in the existing built environment and comparing these findings to their perceived health. The analysis is based on data collected through a mixed-methods approach in three MSH areas facing extensive renovation. The findings demonstrate and exemplify that energy renovation measures may influence a number of interrelated physiological, mental and social wellbeing aspects across scales. As such, the paper contributes with new insights, which can help promote previously neglected aspects of resident wellbeing in future energy renovation design processes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 284-302
Author(s):  
Lucy Annang Ingram ◽  
Chiwoneso B. Tinago ◽  
Bo Cai ◽  
Louisiana Wright Sanders ◽  
Tina Bevington ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 195
Author(s):  
Jacob Nowinski ◽  
Gay Swaite ◽  
Adrian Hunnisett ◽  
Christina Cunliffe

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa A. Cranley ◽  
Matthias Hoben ◽  
Jasper Yeung ◽  
Carole A. Estabrooks ◽  
Peter G. Norton ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronica M Swallow ◽  
Ruth Nightingale ◽  
Julian Williams ◽  
Heather Lambert ◽  
Nicholas JA Webb ◽  
...  

The Breast ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 126-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ragna Stalsberg ◽  
Terje Andreas Eikemo ◽  
Steinar Lundgren ◽  
Randi Johansen Reidunsdatter

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Abdul Hadi ◽  
Gretl A McHugh ◽  
S José Closs

Background: Chronic pain has become a common problem within primary care and can negatively impact patients’ lives. Objective: To assess and explore the impact of chronic pain on patients’ quality of life (QoL) using quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Methods: A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used. Chronic pain patients were recruited from a community-based pain clinic located in the North of England. Quality of life was assessed using Short-Form 36 version 2. Quality of life data were also extracted from the Third Oxford and Lifestyles Survey and Welsh Health Survey to allow comparison of QoL of chronic pain patients with that of the general population and patients with long-term conditions. Qualitative interviews were conducted face-to-face using a semistructured topic guide. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS version 24 and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Results: Seventy-nine patients participated in the quantitative phase. The mean (standard deviation) age was 46.5 (14.5). Lower back (54; 68.3%) followed by lower limb were the most common pain sites. Compared with the general population and patients with long-term conditions, chronic pain patients had significantly lower mean QoL scores across all domains of SF-36 (All P < .05). Six themes emerged from qualitative data: interference with physical functioning, interference with professional life, interference with relationships and family life, interference with social life, interference with sleep, and interference with mood. Conclusion: The multidimensional negative impact of chronic pain leads to poorer QoL among patients with chronic pain compared to the general population and patients with other long-term conditions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 221 (4) ◽  
pp. S116
Author(s):  
Alexander C. Allori ◽  
Irene J. Pien ◽  
Danielle L. Sobol ◽  
Anna R. Carlson ◽  
Stephanie Watkins ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document