The impact of an education program on hand hygiene compliance and nosocomial infection incidence in an urban Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: An intervention study with before and after comparison

2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 1245-1252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Onno K. Helder ◽  
Johannes Brug ◽  
Caspar W.N. Looman ◽  
Johannes B. van Goudoever ◽  
René F. Kornelisse
2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1096-1098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig H. Raskind ◽  
Sarah Worley ◽  
Joan Vinski ◽  
Johanna Goldfarb

An observational study was performed at a level III neonatal intensive care unit to assess the impact of a hand hygiene promotion educational program on rates of compliance with hand hygiene on entrance into the unit. There was an initial improvement in the rate of compliance at 1 month after the intervention (from 89% [168 of 189 opportunities] to 100% [212 of 212 opportunities]; P<.001], but the rate decreased to the baseline rate at 3 months (89% [85 of 96 opportunities]).


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 408-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arunava Biswas ◽  
Sangeeta Das Bhattacharya ◽  
Arun Kumarendu Singh ◽  
Mallika Saha

Abstract Objective Our goal for this study was to quantify healthcare provider compliance with hand hygiene protocols and develop a conceptual framework for increasing hand hygiene compliance in a low-resource neonatal intensive care unit. Materials and Methods We developed a 3-phase intervention that involved departmental discussion, audit, and follow-up action. A 4-month unobtrusive audit during night and day shifts was performed. The audit results were presented, and a conceptual framework of barriers to and solutions for increasing hand hygiene compliance was developed collectively. Results A total of 1308 hand hygiene opportunities were observed. Among 1227 planned patient contacts, hand-washing events (707 [58.6%]), hand rub events (442 [36%]), and missed hand hygiene (78 [6.4%]) events were observed. The missed hand hygiene rate was 20% during resuscitation. Missed hand hygiene opportunities occurred 3.2 times (95% confidence interval, 1.9–5.3 times) more often during resuscitation procedures than during planned contact and 6.14 times (95% confidence interval, 2.36–16.01 times) more often when providers moved between patients. Structural and process determinants of hand hygiene noncompliance were identified through a root-cause analysis in which all members of the neonatal intensive care unit team participated. The mean hand-washing duration was 40 seconds. In 83% of cases, drying hands after washing was neglected. Hand recontamination after hand-washing was seen in 77% of the cases. Washing up to elbow level was observed in 27% of hand-wash events. After departmental review of the study results, hand rubs were placed at each bassinet to address these missed opportunities. Conclusions Hand hygiene was suboptimal during resuscitation procedures and between patient contacts. We developed a conceptual framework for improving hand hygiene through a root-cause analysis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afsana Begum ◽  
Md Shafiqul Bari ◽  
Md Abul Kalam Azad ◽  
Md Iqbal Hossain ◽  
Pradip Ranjan Saha

Background: Nosocomial infection (NI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality of patients attending the healthcare facilities all over the world. Only a few studies regarding this issue have been conducted in Bangladesh.Objective: To describe the load of NI and to assess role of hand hygiene compliance of doctors and nurses regarding its prevention.Method: In this cross-sectional study, medical records of all patients admitted from January 2014 to June 2014 were reviewed and data were collected from patients who had diagnosis of NI. Collected data includes month wise number of NI patients, types of NI, organism responsible for NI and hand hygiene compliance of doctors and nurses. Regarding hand hygiene compliance only critical care areas were considered.Results: During the study period, a total of 8769 patients were admitted in all inpatient departments and critical care areas (cardiac intensive care unit, neonatal intensive care unit, general intensive care unit, coronary care unit, general high dependency unit and cardiac high dependency unit) of the hospital and number of NI was 201 (2.29%). The highest NI was respiratory tract infection (63%) and the lowest was skin & soft tissue infection (2%). Predominant organisms responsible were E. coli (16%), acinetobacter species (15%), Pseudomonas species (14%), Klebsiella species (13%), Serratia species (13%) and Candida species (13%). The highest average hand hygiene compliance (67.67%) and lowest NI (1.14%) was observed in June 2014.Conclusion: In this study, NI rate was the lowest when the hand hygiene compliance was the highest. So, it is obvious that implementation of hand hygiene may be one of the important measures to prevent NI. So, hospitals should have strict guidelines and review measures to prevent this man made phenomenon. All these efforts will not only reduce patient morbidity, but will also reduce the use of antibiotics and healthcare costs of the country.Bangladesh Crit Care J September 2017; 5(2): 83-87


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Huiping Huang ◽  
Jing Ran ◽  
Jianzhou Yang ◽  
Peng Li ◽  
Guihua Zhuang

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of bundle intervention on healthcare-associated (HA) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) infection in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Methods. In this study, 11,277 infants having undergone treatment at the NICU in Xiamen, China, from January 2014 to February 2017 were recruited. We retrospectively reviewed patients’ demographic and clinical information. Patients from 2014 to 2015 were treated as the control group and those from 2016 to 2017 were classified as the experimental group. Bundle intervention measures were performed, including screening for MRSA, isolation precautions, training of hand hygiene, cleaning protocols, and decontamination of isolation ward. The HA-MRSA data and compliance of infection control measures between both groups were analyzed. Results. Through bundle interventions, the compliance with the isolation of MRSA raised from 55.88% to 92.86% and hand hygiene compliance increased from 90.07% to 93.23% (P < 0.05). The HA infection decreased from 1.87% to 1.71% (P > 0.05) and HA detection rate of MRSA declined from 2.63‰ to 1.00‰, respectively (P < 0.05). Conclusion. Multifaceted interventions can effectively prevent MRSA infection and transmission; this includes active surveillance, isolation precautions, increased hand hygiene compliance, environmental cleaning, and decontamination.


2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (11) ◽  
pp. e279-e281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azam Ghorbani ◽  
Leila Sadeghi ◽  
Akram Shahrokhi ◽  
Asghar Mohammadpour ◽  
Mary Addo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document