Addressing Hand Hygiene Compliance in a Low-Resource Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: a Quality Improvement Project

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 408-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arunava Biswas ◽  
Sangeeta Das Bhattacharya ◽  
Arun Kumarendu Singh ◽  
Mallika Saha

Abstract Objective Our goal for this study was to quantify healthcare provider compliance with hand hygiene protocols and develop a conceptual framework for increasing hand hygiene compliance in a low-resource neonatal intensive care unit. Materials and Methods We developed a 3-phase intervention that involved departmental discussion, audit, and follow-up action. A 4-month unobtrusive audit during night and day shifts was performed. The audit results were presented, and a conceptual framework of barriers to and solutions for increasing hand hygiene compliance was developed collectively. Results A total of 1308 hand hygiene opportunities were observed. Among 1227 planned patient contacts, hand-washing events (707 [58.6%]), hand rub events (442 [36%]), and missed hand hygiene (78 [6.4%]) events were observed. The missed hand hygiene rate was 20% during resuscitation. Missed hand hygiene opportunities occurred 3.2 times (95% confidence interval, 1.9–5.3 times) more often during resuscitation procedures than during planned contact and 6.14 times (95% confidence interval, 2.36–16.01 times) more often when providers moved between patients. Structural and process determinants of hand hygiene noncompliance were identified through a root-cause analysis in which all members of the neonatal intensive care unit team participated. The mean hand-washing duration was 40 seconds. In 83% of cases, drying hands after washing was neglected. Hand recontamination after hand-washing was seen in 77% of the cases. Washing up to elbow level was observed in 27% of hand-wash events. After departmental review of the study results, hand rubs were placed at each bassinet to address these missed opportunities. Conclusions Hand hygiene was suboptimal during resuscitation procedures and between patient contacts. We developed a conceptual framework for improving hand hygiene through a root-cause analysis.

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1096-1098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig H. Raskind ◽  
Sarah Worley ◽  
Joan Vinski ◽  
Johanna Goldfarb

An observational study was performed at a level III neonatal intensive care unit to assess the impact of a hand hygiene promotion educational program on rates of compliance with hand hygiene on entrance into the unit. There was an initial improvement in the rate of compliance at 1 month after the intervention (from 89% [168 of 189 opportunities] to 100% [212 of 212 opportunities]; P<.001], but the rate decreased to the baseline rate at 3 months (89% [85 of 96 opportunities]).


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Huiping Huang ◽  
Jing Ran ◽  
Jianzhou Yang ◽  
Peng Li ◽  
Guihua Zhuang

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of bundle intervention on healthcare-associated (HA) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) infection in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Methods. In this study, 11,277 infants having undergone treatment at the NICU in Xiamen, China, from January 2014 to February 2017 were recruited. We retrospectively reviewed patients’ demographic and clinical information. Patients from 2014 to 2015 were treated as the control group and those from 2016 to 2017 were classified as the experimental group. Bundle intervention measures were performed, including screening for MRSA, isolation precautions, training of hand hygiene, cleaning protocols, and decontamination of isolation ward. The HA-MRSA data and compliance of infection control measures between both groups were analyzed. Results. Through bundle interventions, the compliance with the isolation of MRSA raised from 55.88% to 92.86% and hand hygiene compliance increased from 90.07% to 93.23% (P < 0.05). The HA infection decreased from 1.87% to 1.71% (P > 0.05) and HA detection rate of MRSA declined from 2.63‰ to 1.00‰, respectively (P < 0.05). Conclusion. Multifaceted interventions can effectively prevent MRSA infection and transmission; this includes active surveillance, isolation precautions, increased hand hygiene compliance, environmental cleaning, and decontamination.


Author(s):  
Gamze Alci ◽  
Hulya Bilgen ◽  
Eren Ozek ◽  
Aysegul Karahasan Yagci

Background: We aimed to determine hand hygiene (HH) compliance of the healthcare workers (HCW’s) and evaluate if there is an epidemiological relation between the microorganisms isolated from the hands of HCWs and patients clinical materials in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).Methods: HH compliance was observed in two unannounced phases in March and in August within the scope of 5 indications determined by WHO. Between two phases personnel was trained to improve HH by educational sessions and introduction of Semmelweis system hand in scan (HIS, Sysmex) in the unit.  A total of 22 nurses, 11 physicians and 5 staff was working in the NICU. Hand samples taken from HCW by glove juice method were inoculated quantitatively in culture plates and colonies were identified by MALDI-TOF MS. Epidemiological relation between clinical isolates and hand samples was investigated with arbitrary primed PCR.Results: Although overall compliance remained only 50%, a significant increase in compliance was detected in August prior to aseptic procedures and after contact with patients and body fluids. Alcohol scrub was preferred as 60.4% in March and 75.2% in August. HH efficacy reached to 72% by implementing HIS. During this period, 10.7% of 607 patient’s samples revealed clinically significant growth. Potential pathogens were isolated in 5.2% of 144 hand samples, but any epidemiological correlation with patient isolates was detected.Conclusions: HH compliance observations should be done at regular intervals and current technology could be utilized in trainings to overcome hospital related infections.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document