Virtual quad zygoma implant placement using cone beam computed tomography: sufficiency of malar bone volume, intraosseous implant length, and relationship to the sinus according to the degree of alveolar bone atrophy

Radiographic examination is one of the examinations required in determining the treatment plan and evaluating thesuccess of dental implant placement. Cone beamcomputed tomography3D(CBCT 3D)is a tool that produce radiographicimaging in three dimensions that can meet the information needed by dentists/specialists in dental implant placement.This report discusses the role of interpretating the CBCT 3D bone area, indication of dental implant with give a sight3D, measure the distance and position of the implant and to assess the quality of the bone at dental implant placement.Interpretation of CBCT 3D case is the size of the dental implant alveolar bone morphometric teeth region 46 and 37qualified radiographically for dental implants. The conclusion of this paper is a CBCT 3D can be a determinant of thesuccess of dental implant placement as capable of being able to analyze a complete, clear and more accurate measurementthrough a 3D picture, the analysis of the size/3D morphometric, density analysis, and histogram/ trabecular analysis.

Download Full-text

Lingualized Flapless Implant Placement into Fresh Extraction Sockets Preserves Buccal Alveolar Bone: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study

The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry ◽

10.11607/prd.1807 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 34 (1) ◽

pp. 61-68 ◽

Cited By ~ 18

Author(s):

Ernesto Lee ◽

Oscar Gonzalez-Martin ◽

Joseph Fiorellini

Keyword(s):

Computed Tomography ◽

Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽

Alveolar Bone ◽

Cone Beam ◽

Implant Placement

Download Full-text

Application of 3D tooth model for monitoring of implant space and inter-root distance without radiographs: a proof of concept study

International Journal of Implant Dentistry ◽

10.1186/s40729-020-00253-3 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Kyungmin Lee ◽

Gyu-Hyoung Lee

Keyword(s):

Computed Tomography ◽

Radiation Exposure ◽

Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽

Alveolar Bone ◽

Tooth Movement ◽

Treatment Evaluation ◽

Cone Beam ◽

Proof Of Concept ◽

Cbct Image ◽

Root Position

Abstract Background Radiographs are integral in evaluating implant space and inter-root distance. The purpose of this report is to introduce a method for evaluating the 3D root position with minimal radiation using a 3D tooth model composed of an intraoral-scanned crown and a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-scanned root. Materials and methods Intraoral scan and CBCT scan of the patient were obtained before treatment. In the CBCT image, tooth segmentation was performed by isolating individual teeth from the maxillary and mandibular alveolar bone using software program. The 3D tooth model was fabricated by combining segmented individual teeth with the intraoral scan. Results A post-treatment intraoral scan was integrated into the tooth model, and the resulting position of the root could be predicted without additional radiographs. It is possible to monitor the root position after a pretreatment CBCT scan using a 3D tooth model without additional radiographs. Conclusion The application of the 3D tooth model benefits the patient by reducing repeated radiation exposure while providing the clinician with a precise treatment evaluation to monitor tooth movement.

Download Full-text

Alveolar bone heights of maxillary central incisors in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients using cone-beam computed tomography evaluation

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie ◽

10.1007/s00056-020-00276-w ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Marcin Stasiak ◽

Anna Wojtaszek-Słomińska ◽

Bogna Racka-Pilszak

Keyword(s):

Computed Tomography ◽

Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽

Cleft Lip ◽

Cleft Lip And Palate ◽

Alveolar Bone ◽

Contralateral Side ◽

Cone Beam ◽

Rank Test ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Alveolar Bone Grafting

Abstract Purpose The aims of this retrospective cross-sectional study were to measure and compare labial and palatal alveolar bone heights of maxillary central incisors in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients, following STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. Patients and methods The study group consisted of 21 patients with a mean age of 16 years. High-resolution cone-beam computed tomography was performed at least one year after secondary alveolar bone grafting. The experimental side was the cleft side and the contralateral side without congenital cleft was the control. Measurements were performed on incisors’ midsagittal cross-sections. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for intergroup comparisons. Results The labial and palatal distances between alveolar bone crests and cementoenamel junctions were significantly greater on the cleft side than on the noncleft side. Mean differences were 0.75 and 1.41 mm, respectively. The prevalence of dehiscences at the cleft side maxillary central incisors was 52% on the labial surface and 43% on the palatal surface. In the controls, it was 19% and 14%, respectively. Conclusion The cleft-adjacent maxillary central incisors had more apically displaced alveolar bone crests on the labial and palatal sides of the roots than the controls. Higher prevalence of dehiscences was found on the cleft side. Bone margin differences predispose to gingival height differences of the central incisors. These differences could increase the demands of patients to obtain more esthetic treatment results with orthodontic extrusion and periodontal intervention on the cleft side.

Download Full-text