Upper airway stimulation as an alternative to maxillomandibular advancement for obstructive sleep apnoea in a patient with dentofacial deformity: case report with literature review

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 908-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.O. Hong ◽  
S. Poomkonsarn ◽  
G. Millesi ◽  
S.Y.C. Liu
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faiza Safiruddin ◽  
Olivier M. Vanderveken ◽  
Nico de Vries ◽  
Joachim T. Maurer ◽  
Kent Lee ◽  
...  

Upper-airway stimulation (UAS) using a unilateral implantable neurostimulator for the hypoglossal nerve is an effective therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea patients with continuous positive airway pressure intolerance. This study evaluated stimulation effects on retropalatal and retrolingual dimensions during drug-induced sedation compared with wakefulness to assess mechanistic relationships in response to UAS.Patients with an implanted stimulator underwent nasal video endoscopy while awake and/or during drug-induced sedation in the supine position. The cross-sectional area, anterior–posterior and lateral dimensions of the retropalatal and retrolingual regions were measured during baseline and stimulation.15 patients underwent endoscopy while awake and 12 underwent drug-induced sedation endoscopy. Increased levels of stimulation were associated with increased area of both the retropalatal and retrolingual regions. During wakefulness, a therapeutic level of stimulation increased the retropalatal area by 56.4% (p=0.002) and retrolingual area by 184.1% (p=0.006). During stimulation, the retropalatal area enlarged in the anterior–posterior dimension while retrolingual area enlarged in both anterior–posterior and lateral dimensions. During drug-induced sedation endoscopy, the same stimulation increased the retropalatal area by 180.0% (p=0.002) and retrolingual area by 130.1% (p=0.008). Therapy responders had larger retropalatal enlargement with stimulation than nonresponders.UAS increases both the retropalatal and retrolingual areas. This multilevel enlargement may explain reductions of the apnoea–hypopnoea index in selected patients receiving this therapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 134 (5) ◽  
pp. 447-452
Author(s):  
P E Vonk ◽  
M J L Ravesloot ◽  
J P van Maanen ◽  
N de Vries

AbstractObjectivesThis paper aimed to: retrospectively analyse single-centre results in terms of surgical success, respiratory outcomes and adverse events after short-term follow up in obstructive sleep apnoea patients treated with upper airway stimulation; and evaluate the correlation between pre-operative drug-induced sleep endoscopy findings and surgical success.MethodsA retrospective descriptive cohort study was conducted, including a consecutive series of obstructive sleep apnoea patients undergoing implantation of an upper airway stimulation system.ResultsForty-four patients were included. The total median Apnoea–Hypopnea Index and oxygen desaturation index significantly decreased from 37.6 to 8.3 events per hour (p < 0.001) and from 37.1 to 15.9 events per hour (p < 0.001), respectively. The surgical success rate was 88.6 per cent, and did not significantly differ between patients with or without complete collapse at the retropalatal level (p = 0.784). The most common therapy-related adverse event reported was (temporary) stimulation-related discomfort.ConclusionUpper airway stimulation is an effective and safe treatment in obstructive sleep apnoea patients with continuous positive airway pressure intolerance or failure. There was no significant difference in surgical outcome between patients with tongue base collapse with or without complete anteroposterior collapse at the level of the palate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document