Prognostic significance of extranodal extension in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma with occult neck metastases

Author(s):  
M. Mamic ◽  
M. Lucijanic ◽  
L. Manojlovic ◽  
D. Muller ◽  
P. Suton ◽  
...  
Oral Oncology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Carlos de Vicente ◽  
Agustı́n Herrero-Zapatero ◽  
Manuel Florentino Fresno ◽  
Juan Sebastián López-Arranz

2020 ◽  
pp. 194338752097141
Author(s):  
William M. Mendenhall ◽  
Adam L. Holtzman ◽  
Roi Dagan ◽  
Curtis M. Bryant ◽  
Kathryn E. Hitchcock ◽  
...  

Study Design: Literature review. Objective: To review the current role of radiotherapy (RT) in the management of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Methods: Review of selected literature. Results: T1-T2N0 SCCs may be treated with either RT alone or surgery with a high likelihood of cure. The pendulum swung toward surgery with postoperative RT (PORT) added depending on the pathological findings in the mid 1980s. Patients with positive margins, extranodal extension (ENE), and/or 4 or more positive nodes receive concomitant chemotherapy (POCRT). Patients with T3-T4 and/or positive regional nodes are treated with surgery and PORT alone or POCRT. The likelihood of cure is moderate to low depending on extent of disease. The likelihood of major complications ranges from 10% to 30% depending on the method of reconstruction and the aggressiveness of postoperative PORT/POCRT. Patients with very advanced disease are treated with palliative RT, chemotherapy, or supportive care. Conclusions: The role of RT in the management of oral cavity SCC is primarily in the postoperative setting with palliative RT being reserved for those with very advanced disease where the likelihood of cure is remote.


2014 ◽  
Vol 140 (12) ◽  
pp. 1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moran Amit ◽  
Tzu Chen Yen ◽  
Chun Ta Liao ◽  
Pankaj Chaturvedi ◽  
Jai Prakash Agarwal ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Weijin Gao ◽  
Zhuowei Tian ◽  
Xiaodan Fang ◽  
Jincai Xue ◽  
Zhixiang Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Regional metastasis sometimes occurs in anatomies that are not included in traditional neck dissections. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes of squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity (SCCOC) patients with unconventional metastatic lymph nodes (UMLNs) in sublingual, buccinator, and parotid anatomies. Methods This retrospective multi-institutional analysis of squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity patients with unconventional metastatic lymph nodes was performed from January 2008 to December 2015. All the included patients received surgical treatment for unconventional metastatic lymph nodes. The end point of the study was to determine the factors influencing these patients’ survival and the corresponding solutions to improve survival. Pathological grade, contralateral metastasis, extranodal extension, and other factors were collected and analyzed by logistic regression and the Cox model. Results A total of 89 patients were identified. Among these patients, 25 (28.1%) received primary treatment, 28 (31.5%) received staged (therapeutic) neck dissections, and 36 (40.4%) had recurrent or residual diseases. Altogether, 45 patients (51%) had buccinator node metastases, 31 (35%) had sublingual metastases, 12 (14%) had parotid metastases, and 1 had both buccinator and parotid metastases. Regarding regional metastases, 31 patients (34.8%) had isolated unconventional metastatic lymph nodes. Adjuvant therapies were administered to 72 (80.9%) patients, 25 (28.1%) of whom were treated with radio-chemotherapies. The overall survival rate was 38.2%. Multivariate analysis found that the subsites of unconventional metastatic lymph nodes (P = 0.029), extranodal extension in both unconventional metastatic lymph nodes (P = 0.025) and cervical lymph nodes (P = 0.015), sites of primary or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity (P = 0.035), and types of neck dissections (P = 0.025) were significantly associated with overall survival. Conclusions Unconventional metastatic lymph nodes are uncommon, yet awareness of potential unconventional metastatic lymph nodes should be heightened. Early surgical interventions are warranted in patients with sublingual or buccinator metastases, while caution should be given to those with parotid metastases. Aggressive en bloc (in-continuity) resections may be mandatory in advanced oral cancer cases for close anatomic locations with possible buccal or sublingual metastases.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 1727-1733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vlad C. Sandulache ◽  
Chieko Michikawa ◽  
Pranav Kataria ◽  
Frederico O. Gleber-Netto ◽  
Diana Bell ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document