Grain-scale failure mechanism of porous sandstone: An experimental and numerical FDEM study of the Brazilian Tensile Strength test using CT-Scan microstructure

2020 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 104348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Chen ◽  
Jiansheng Xiang ◽  
John-Paul Latham ◽  
Richard R. Bakker
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Strength ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Failure Mechanism ◽  
Strength Test ◽  
Brazilian Tensile Strength ◽  
Tensile Strength Test ◽  
Porous Sandstone ◽  
Scale Failure

scholarly journals HYBRID CONTINUUM-DISCONTINUUM MODELLING OF ROCK FRACUTRE PROCESS IN BRAZILIAN TENSILE STRENGTH TEST

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huaming An ◽  
Hongyuan Liu ◽  
Xuguang Wang ◽  
Jianjun Shi ◽  
Haoyu Han
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Strength ◽  
Strength Test ◽  
Brazilian Tensile Strength ◽  
Tensile Strength Test

scholarly journals Experimental Study of Brazilian Tensile Strength of Concrete Under Static Loads

2020 ◽  
Vol 206 ◽  
pp. 01018
Author(s):  
Rui Li ◽  
Lei Liu ◽  
Zhihua Zhang ◽  
Huaming An
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Damage Index ◽  
Modern Society ◽  
Strength Test ◽  
Test Method ◽  
Tensile Failure ◽  
Brazilian Tensile Strength ◽  
Failure Patterns ◽  
Tensile Strength Test

Concrete is one of the most significant materials in modern society. It is widely used in many projects. Thus it is essential to study the strength and the failure patterns of this material. As well known, the compressive strength is much higher than the tensile strength for concrete. Thus, it is easy to fail due to the tensile strength for concrete. Thus, this paper focuses on the study of the tensile strength of the concrete and its failure patterns. Three types of concretes are made for studying the tensile strengths and the failure patterns of the concretes. Then the Brazilian tensile strength test method is employed in this study. The mythology of calculating tensile strength by the Brazilian tensile strength test method is introduced. Many discs are made for the tests. The Rock mechanics testing machine is used to excavate pressure on the top and bottom of the disc. It is concluded that the failure of the disc is along the vertical diameter between the top and bottom plates contacting the dis. The tensile failure is not obviously influenced by the ratios of the materials while the tensile strength is significantly influenced by the ratios of the concrete. The damage index of concrete is also proposed to describe the capabilities of resisting failure.

Brazilian Tensile Strength Test of Orgainc-rich Shale

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. T. Lai ◽  
H. Li ◽  
H. H. Liu ◽  
J. L. Zhang ◽  
D. Georgi
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Strength ◽  
Strength Test ◽  
Brazilian Tensile Strength ◽  
Tensile Strength Test

scholarly journals PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN LIMBAH PLASTIK POLYPROPYLENE (PP) SEBAGAI CAMPURAN AGREGAT KASAR TERHADAP KUAT TEKAN DAN TARIK PADA BETON FC’ 25 MPA

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-89
Author(s):  
Angga Pirman Firdaus ◽  
Jonbi
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Strength ◽  
Compressive Strength ◽  
Strength Test ◽  
Plastic Waste ◽  
Concrete Mixture ◽  
Strength Testing ◽  
Concrete Compressive Strength ◽  
Tensile Strength Test ◽  
Compressive Strength Test ◽  
Waste Mixture

Indonesia ranks second in the world's largest plastic waste producer after China. Each year, Indonesia can contributeup to 187.2 million tons of plastic waste, while China reaches 262.9 million tons of plastic waste. Based on the data, one way to utilize plastic waste by using plastic waste as a mixture of concrete, where the plastic used is polypropylene (PP) plastic with different percentage of concrete mixture, the test includes compressive strength test and tensile concrete. The results of concrete compressive strength testing with polypropylene (PP) plastic waste mixture of 5%, 10% and 15% at age 28 in aggregate aggregate mixture decreased by 5.15%, 6.89% and 13.53%. As for the result of concrete tensile strength test with polypropylene (PP) plastic waste mixture of 5%, 10% and 15% at age 28 in crude aggregate mixture decreased 17,61%, 24,13% dan 23,24%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document