Equivalent Biochemical Control and Improved Prostate-Specific Antigen Nadir After Permanent Prostate Seed Implant Brachytherapy Versus High-Dose Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy and High-Dose Conformal Proton Beam Radiotherapy Boost

Author(s):  
Siavash Jabbari ◽  
Vivian K. Weinberg ◽  
Katsuto Shinohara ◽  
Joycelyn L. Speight ◽  
Alexander R. Gottschalk ◽  
...  
2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 1936-1941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Zelefsky ◽  
William K. Kelly ◽  
Howard I. Scher ◽  
Henry Lee ◽  
Tracy Smart ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and tolerance of neoadjuvant and concomitant estramustine phosphate and vinblastine (EV) with high-dose three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for patients with unfavorable-risk prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with unfavorable-risk prostate cancer were enrolled onto a prospective study to determine the feasibility of combining EV with 3D-CRT. Patients were eligible if any of the following requirements were satisfied: (1) Gleason score ≥ 8 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 10 ng/mL; (2) Gleason score of 7 and PSA > 20 ng/mL; (3) clinical stage T3N0M0 disease with PSA > 20 ng/mL; (4) any patient with T4N0M0 disease; or (5) patients with TXN1MO disease. Therapy consisted of three 8-week cycles of EV and 8 weeks of 3D-CRT. Estramustine phosphate was given orally beginning on week 1 and continued until the completion of 3D-CRT. Each 8-week cycle of vinblastine consisted of 6 weekly intravenous injections followed by a 2-week rest period. Radiation therapy was administered using a three-dimensional conformal approach to a prescription dose of 75.6 Gy. The median follow-up was 26 months (range, 6 to 40 months). RESULTS: Twenty-three (85%) of 27 patients completed the entire course of therapy and were assessable for toxicities and biochemical outcome. Two patients (7%) developed grade 3 hematologic toxicity that resolved, and two patients (7%) developed grade 3 hepatoxicity, manifesting as persistent elevation of serum transaminase levels, necessitating discontinuation of the chemotherapy and withdrawal from the treatment program. The most prominent adverse effects from this regimen were mild to moderate (grade 1 to 2) nausea and fatigue related to estramustine. Mild peripheral edema was seen in 15% of patients and was treated with diuresis. 3D-CRT was tolerated well in these patients. Medications were required for relief of acute grade 2 rectal (gastrointestinal [GI]) and urinary (genitourinary [GU]) symptoms in 35% and 48% of patients, respectively. Three patients developed acute grade 3 GU toxicities. The 2-year actuarial likelihood of late grade 2 GI toxicity was 20%. No late grade 3 or 4 GI toxicities were observed. The 2-year actuarial likelihoods of late grade 2 and 3 GU toxicities were 25% and 12%, respectively. No grade 4 GU toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant and concomitant EV with high-dose 3D-CRT is well tolerated in patients with unfavorable-risk prostate cancer. Although the incidence of modest (grade 2) late GI and GU toxicities seem to be increased compared with 3D-CRT alone or in combination with androgen ablation therapy, no severe toxicities were encountered with this regimen.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7546-7546
Author(s):  
I. Sekine ◽  
M. Sumi ◽  
Y. Ito ◽  
H. Nokihara ◽  
N. Yamamoto ◽  
...  

7546 Background: The optimal dose of radiotherapy remains unclear in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage III NSCLC. Methods: Eligible patients (unresectable stage III NSCLC, age ≥ 20 years, PS 0–1, V20 ≤ 30%) received cisplatin (80mg/m2 day 1) and vinorelbine (20mg/m2 days 1 and 8) repeated every 4 weeks for 3–4 cycles. The dose of 3D-CRT was 66 Gy in 33 fractions, 72 Gy in 36 fractions, and 78 Gy in 39 fractions at levels 1–3, respectively. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), defined as grade ≥3 esophagitis, pneumonitis, myelitis, dermatitis and heart injury, and early stop of protocol treatment, was evaluated in 6–12 patients at each level. Results: Of the 17, 16 and 24 patients assessed for eligibility, 13 (76%), 12 (75%), and 6 (25%) were enrolled into levels 1–3, respectively, of the study. A total of 26 patients were excluded because of V20 > 30% (n=10), overdose to the esophagus (n=8) and brachial plexus (n=2), comorbidity (n=3), or patient refusal (n=3). There were 26 men and 5 women with a median (range) age of 60 (41–75) years. Of these, 23 (74%) had adenocarcinoma and 20 (65%) had stage IIIA disease. The full planned dose of radiotherapy could be administered in all the patients, and more than 80% of the patients received 3–4 cycles of chemotherapy. Grade 3–4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were noted in 24 (77%) and 5 (16%) of the 31 patients, respectively. Grade 4 infection, grade 3 esophagitis and grade 3 pulmonary toxicity were noted in one, two and one patients, respectively. DLT was noted in 17% of the patients at each level. Two (6%) complete and 27 (87%) partial responses were obtained. In a preliminary survival analysis, the median progression-free and overall survivals were determined to be 15.0 months and 37.6 months, respectively. Conclusions: At the level of 78Gy, only 25% of the patients assessed for eligibility were actually eligible. Toxicity was relatively mild up to 78 Gy in this highly selective patient group. Thus, we determined that the recommended dose of 3D-CRT administered concurrently with cisplatin and vinorelbine chemotherapy was 72Gy. [Table: see text]


2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1635-1642 ◽  
Author(s):  
June L. Chan ◽  
Susan W. Lee ◽  
Benedick A. Fraass ◽  
Daniel P. Normolle ◽  
Harry S. Greenberg ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: The goal of three-dimensional (3-D) conformal radiation is to increase the dose delivered to tumor while minimizing dose to surrounding normal brain. Previously it has been shown that even escalated doses of 70 to 80 Gy have failure patterns that are predominantly local. This article describes the failure patterns and survival seen with high-grade gliomas given 90 Gy using a 3-D conformal intensity-modulated radiation technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 1996 to April 1999, 34 patients with supratentorial high-grade gliomas were treated to 90 Gy. For those that recurred, failure patterns were defined in terms of percentage of recurrent tumor located within the high-dose region. Recurrences with more than 95% of their volume within the high-dose region were considered central; those with 80% to 95%, 20% to 80%, and less than 20% were considered in-field, marginal, and distant, respectively. RESULTS: The median age was 55 years, and median follow-up was 11.7 months. At time of analysis, 23 (67.6%) of 34 patients had developed radiographic evidence of recurrence. The patterns of failure were 18 (78%) of 23 central, three (13%) of 23 in-field, two (9%) of 23 marginal, and zero (0%) of 23 distant. The median survival was 11.7 months, with 1-year survival of 47.1% and 2-year survival of 12.9%. No significant treatment toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: Despite dose escalation to 90 Gy, the predominant failure pattern in high-grade gliomas remains local. This suggests that close margins used in highly conformal treatments do not increase the risk of marginal or distant recurrences. Our results indicate that intensification of local radiotherapy with dose escalation is feasible and deserves further evaluation for high-grade gliomas.


Author(s):  
Ankita Mehta ◽  
Piyush Kumar ◽  
Silambarasan N. S. ◽  
Arvind Kumar ◽  
Pavan Kumar

Abstract Introduction Adjuvant radiotherapy has an important role in preventing locoregional recurrences. But radiation-induced late sequelae have become an important area of concern. The ideal postmastectomy radiotherapy technique is an area of controversy. The present study was designed to compare two widely practiced conformal techniques, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), in terms of dosimetry. Material and Methods A total of 50 postmodified radical mastectomy patients were selected and were randomized to treatment either by 3DCRT or IMRT technique. Two opposing tangential beams were used in 3DCRT plans whereas five to seven tangential beams were used for IMRT plans. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. The dosimetric parameters were compared for planning target volume (PTV), lungs, heart, and left ventricle, opposite breast and esophagus. Results The dosimetric parameters of PTV in terms of D95%, D90%, D50%, and Dmean showed no significant difference among both techniques. The IMRT technique had significantly better mean values of Dnear-min/D98% (45.56 vs. 37.92 Gy; p = 0.01) and Dnear-max/D2% (51.47 vs. 53.65 Gy; p < 0.001). Also, conformity index (1.07 vs. 1.29; p = 0.004) and homogeneity index (0.22 vs. 0.46; p = 0.003) were significantly better in IMRT arm.The dosimetric parameters of ipsilateral lung were significantly higher in IMRT arm in terms of mean dose (19.92 vs. 14.69 Gy; p < 0.001) and low/medium dose regions (V5, V10, V13, V15, V20; p < 0.05). However, high-dose regions (V40) were significantly higher in 3DCRT arm (15.57 vs. 19.89 Gy; p = 0.02). In contralateral lung also, mean dose was significantly higher in IMRT technique (3.63 vs. 0.53 Gy; p < 0.0001) along with low-dose regions (V5, V10, V13, V15; p < 0.05) while V20 was comparable between both the arms.In left-sided patients, the heart dose favored 3DCRT technique in terms of mean dose (17.33 vs. 8.51 Gy; p = 0.003), low/medium dose regions (V5, V10, V20; p < 0.05), and doses to partial/whole volumes (D33, D67, D100). But the high-dose regions (V25, V30, V40) were comparable between both the arms. The dosimetry of left ventricle also showed significantly lesser values of mean dose and V5 in 3DCRT technique (p < 0.0001).The opposite breast also showed higher mean dose with IMRT technique (2.60 vs. 1.47 Gy; p = 0.009) along with higher V5 (11.60 vs. 3.83 Gy; p = 0.001). The dosimetric parameters of esophagus showed higher mean dose in IMRT technique (10.04 vs. 3.24 Gy; p < 0.0001) but the high-dose regions V35 and V50 were comparable between both the arms. Conclusion A clear advantage could not be demonstrated with any of the techniques. The IMRT technique led to more conformal and homogenous dose distribution with reduction in high-dose regions in ipsilateral lung while the 3DCRT technique showed lesser mean dose to organs at risk (OARs). The exposure of large volumes of OARs to low doses in IMRT technique may translate to increased long-term radiation-induced complications. The shortcomings of 3DCRT technique can be overcome by using multiple subfields within tangential fields.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document