Relationship of Imaging and Pathological Gross Tumor Volume Determined by Whole-mount Serial Sections Technique in Primary Cervical Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. S441-S442
Author(s):  
Y. Zhang
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. S228
Author(s):  
S. Córdoba Largo ◽  
J. Corona Sánchez ◽  
M. Vázquez Masedo ◽  
P. Alcántara Carrió ◽  
A. Doval González ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 1545-1552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-li Chen ◽  
Guang-wen Chen ◽  
Guo-hui Xu ◽  
Jing Ren ◽  
Zhen-lin Li ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo determine whether gross tumor volume (GTV) and the maximum diameter of resectable cervical cancer at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI).Materials and MethodsA total of 315 consecutive patients with cervical cancer were retrospectively identified. Gross tumor volume and the maximum diameter of tumor were evaluated on MRI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine whether tumor size could predict LNM and LVSI. Cutoffs of GTV, maximum diameter, and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification of tumor were first investigated in 255 patients (group A) and then validated in an independent cohort of 60 patients (group B) using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis for predicting the presence of LNM and LVSI.ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that GTV and the maximum diameter of tumor could predict LNM and LVSI (all P < 0.0001). Multivariate analyses indicated GTV as an independent risk factor of LNM and LVSI (all P < 0.0001). In group A, GTV, the maximum diameter, and the FIGO stage could identify LNM (AUC, 0.813, 0.741, and 0.69, respectively) and LVSI (AUC, 0.806, 0.751, and 0.684, respectively). In group B, GTV, the maximum diameter, and the FIGO stage could help identify LNM (AUC, 0.902, 0.825, and 0.759, respectively) and LVSI (AUC, 0.771, 0.748, and 0.700, respectively).ConclusionsGross tumor volume and the maximum diameter of resectable cervical cancer at MRI demonstrated capability in predicting LNM and LVSI, which were more accurate than FIGO stage.


Brachytherapy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niluja Thiruthaneeswaran ◽  
Nicki Groom ◽  
Gerry Lowe ◽  
Linda Bryant ◽  
Peter J. Hoskin

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Chang ◽  
Wei Deng ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
Zongmei Zhou ◽  
Jun Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To investigate the interobserver variability (IOV) in target volume delineation of definitive radiotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer (TEC) among cancer centers in China, and ultimately improve contouring consistency as much as possible to lay the foundation for multi-center prospective studies. Methods Sixteen cancer centers throughout China participated in this study. In Phase 1, three suitable cases with upper, middle, and lower TEC were chosen, and participants were asked to contour a group of gross tumor volume (GTV-T), nodal gross tumor volume (GTV-N) and clinical target volume (CTV) for each case based on their routine experience. In Phase 2, the same clinicians were instructed to follow a contouring protocol to re-contour another group of target volume. The variation of the target volume was analyzed and quantified using dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Results Sixteen clinicians provided routine volumes, whereas ten provided both routine and protocol volumes for each case. The IOV of routine GTV-N was the most striking in all cases, with the smallest DSC of 0.37 (95% CI 0.32–0.42), followed by CTV, whereas GTV-T showed high consistency. After following the protocol, the smallest DSC of GTV-N was improved to 0.64 (95% CI 0.45–0.83, P = 0.005) but the DSC of GTV-T and CTV remained constant in most cases. Conclusion Variability in target volume delineation was observed, but it could be significantly reduced and controlled using mandatory interventions.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Boria ◽  
Daniel Vazquez ◽  
Teresa Castellano ◽  
Enrique Chacon ◽  
José Ángel Mínguez ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 187 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina A. Mayr ◽  
William T. C. Yuh ◽  
Toshiaki Taoka ◽  
Jian Z. Wang ◽  
Dee H. Wu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document