scholarly journals Clinical complete response after nivolumab administered as a third-line treatment for unresectable advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination: A case report

Author(s):  
Toshiaki Komo ◽  
Takahisa Suzuki ◽  
Hirofumi Tazawa ◽  
Haruki Sada ◽  
Hiroshi Morimoto ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. v53
Author(s):  
Takashi Nishimura ◽  
Satoru Iwasa ◽  
Hirokazu Shoji ◽  
Natsuko Okita ◽  
Atsuo Takashima ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 778-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshifumi Yamaguchi ◽  
Satoru Iwasa ◽  
Hirokazu Shoji ◽  
Yoshitaka Honma ◽  
Atsuo Takashima ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 809-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Kawakami ◽  
Nozomu Machida ◽  
Hirofumi Yasui ◽  
Masahiro Kawahira ◽  
Sadayuki Kawai ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 154-154
Author(s):  
Sadayuki Kawai ◽  
Sakura Iizumi ◽  
Atsuo Takashima ◽  
Yukiya Narita ◽  
Masahiro Tajika ◽  
...  

154 Background: While taxane-monotherapy following fluoropyrimidine plus platinum is recognized as the standard treatment strategy for advanced gastric cancer, triplet chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 (DCS) is another option for first-line therapy in Japan. However, efficacy of taxane after DCS therapy has not been sufficiently evaluated. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of taxane-monotherapy after DCS between January 2010 and April 2015 for advanced gastric cancer. The taxane-monotherapy included weekly paclitaxel (PTX) (80 mg/m2, day 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle) and triweekly nab-PTX (260 mg/m2, day 1). Other selection criteria were: ECOG PS < 2; adequate organ function; no severe ascites; HER2-negative. Results: Thirty of 92 patients who had been treated with DCS received taxane-monotherapy. Fifteen and 15 patients received taxane-monotherapy as the second and third-line treatment, respectively. Patients characteristics of each group (2nd/3rd) were; median age: 64/62 (range 27-75/42-75); ECOG PS ≤ 1: 14/13; number of metastatic sites ≥ 2: 9/12; median taxane-free interval from first-line treatment: 1.6/3.4 (range 0.9-2.3/2.2-8.3) months; median total dose of prior DTX: 349/208 (range 39-844/141-685) mg/m2. Number of patients who received PTX/nab-PTX were 10/5 and 13/2 in the second and third line treatment. Median relative dose intensity of taxane was 96.4% (range 57.6-172.9%) in the second-line, 98.5% (44.0-166.8%) in the third-line group. Response rate and disease control rate were 0% and 37.5% in the second-line, and 0% and 38.5% in the third-line group. Median progression free survival and overall survival were 3.4 and 5.8 months in the second-line group, and 2.0 and 4.5 months in the third-line. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, anemia, and anorexia, occurred in 33%, 13% and 13% in the second-line group, and 6.7%, 13% and 6.7% in the third–line group, associated with no treatment related death. Conclusions: It is suggested that taxane-monotherapy has acceptable toxicities but insufficient efficacy in advanced gastric cancer patients after DCS therapy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 83-83
Author(s):  
Yasunobu Ishizuka ◽  
Tetsuji Terazawa ◽  
Hiroki Yukami ◽  
Toshifumi Yamaguchi ◽  
Shin Kuwakado ◽  
...  

83 Background: As a result of ATTRACTION2, nivolumab was added to the third line treatment in advanced gastric cancer (AGC), but the response rate was about 10%. As there is no predictive biomarker and no comparison with cytotoxic regimen, it is difficult to choice the regimen. Therefore, we examined the treatment outcome of cytotoxic regimen in third line treatment in the real world retrospectively. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated efficacy and safety of cytotoxic regimen as third-line treatment in patients with AGC between July 2015 and December 2017. Results: Among 138 patients received chemotherapy as first line, 29 patients (21%) received third line therapy. The characteristics were as follows; the median age, 70 years old (range 34-80); male/female, 19 (66%)/10 (34%); performance status (PS) 0/1/2, 7/18/4. The overall response rate was 19% and the disease control rate was 38%. The median overall survival (OS) was 6.6 months and the progression free survival was 3.8 months. The most common grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were neutropenia (27%), followed by anemia (27%) and febrile neutropenia (13.7%). Grade 3/4 nonhematological toxicities included anorexia (27.6%), diarrhea (10%), nausea (10%). Conclusions: Cytotoxic regimen as third line showed acceptable activity, but only 21% of patients could received the third line chemotherapy. The further investigation of predictive biomarker of nivolumab is expected.


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S141
Author(s):  
T. Ogata ◽  
Y. Narita ◽  
R. Kumanishi ◽  
T. Nakazawa ◽  
Y. Matsubara ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592094237
Author(s):  
Takahiro Ishii ◽  
Akihito Kawazoe ◽  
Akinori Sasaki ◽  
Saori Mishima ◽  
Sawada Kentaro ◽  
...  

Background: The use of nivolumab or irinotecan as the third-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains controversial. Methods: This study analyzed patients with AGC treated with nivolumab or irinotecan (nivolumab group or irinotecan group, respectively) from May 2016 to April 2019 following two or more previous lines of chemotherapy. Univariate survival analysis was conducted to identify the clinical and molecular factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 156 patients (74 treated with nivolumab and 82 treated with irinotecan) were analyzed. The median PFS was 1.9 months in both treatment groups. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.2 and 6.2 months in the nivolumab and irinotecan groups, respectively. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or more, liver metastasis, a large tumor size at baseline, and HER2-positive status were associated with a worse PFS in the nivolumab group compared with the irinotecan group. The nivolumab group showed a significantly longer PFS (median 3.1 versus 2.0 months) and OS (median 12.9 versus 7.8 months) than the irinotecan group in patients with 0 or 1 of these factors, whereas the irinotecan group showed a significantly longer PFS (median 1.0 versus 1.8 months) and a trend of longer OS (median 3.9 versus 6.1 months) in patients with ⩾2 of these factors. Conclusions: Some clinical and molecular factors were associated with outcomes following nivolumab or irinotecan as the third- or later-line treatment in patients with AGC. These factors must be considered while selecting an optimal treatment option.


2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 655-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Nishimura ◽  
Satoru Iwasa ◽  
Kengo Nagashima ◽  
Natsuko Okita ◽  
Atsuo Takashima ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document