scholarly journals Initial learning curve of single-incision transaxillary robotic hemi- and total thyroidectomy – A single team experience from Europe

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 118-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Balazs B. Lörincz ◽  
Chia-Jung Busch ◽  
Nikolaus Möckelmann ◽  
Rainald Knecht
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (13) ◽  
pp. 2594
Author(s):  
Jae Park ◽  
Jun Lee ◽  
Jae Won Cho ◽  
Jong Yoon

The aim of this study was to evaluate the learning curve of robotic thyroid surgery with regard to both operation time and temporary hypoparathyroidism using quantitative statistical analysis. A total of 194 patients who underwent total thyroidectomy and concomitant central compartment node dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma by a single surgeon between December 2008 and September 2017 were enrolled. The learning curve for operation time was assessed using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) technique, and the number of procedures required to reduce the incidence of temporary hypoparathyroidism to less than 30% was determined using the CUSUM and risk-adjusted CUSUM (RA-CUSUM) techniques. The learning curve for operation time was divided into three phases: phase 1 (the initial learning period, 1st–19th cases), phase 2 (the challenging period, 20th–121st cases), and phase 3 (the competent phase, 122nd–194th cases). To reduce the incidence of temporary hypoparathyroidism to <30% required 119 cases, and after adjustment for potential risk factors by RA-CUSUM analysis this extended to 173 cases. Technical proficiency for robotic thyroid surgery with respect to the avoidance of surgical complications probably requires a longer learning period than that required for operation time.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Raza Brohi ◽  
Naseem Mengal ◽  
Rafia Tabassum

Background: Esophageal atresia is rare congenital anomaly, which is traditionally repaired by open thoracotomy. Thoracoscopic esophageal atresia repair has evolved as an effective and safe technique.Material and Methods: This is a retrospective review of 11 cases of esophageal atresia (type C), between June 2015 to May 2016. The objective of study is to describe our initial learning curve of thoracoscopic esophageal atresia repair.Results: Out of 11 patients, initial 4 underwent video assisted technique through single incision of 2 cm to visualize the exact video-scopic anatomy and to do few steps if possible. In last 7 cases, steps were completed with both ends mobilization and intracorporeally single layer interrupted stitching of esophagus. Complications encountered in 3 patients like esophageal leak in one managed conservatively, stenosis and reflux in one patient each.Conclusion: Thoracoscopic esophageal atresia repair is challenging and demanding surgery. Every surgeon has a learning curve before successful thoracoscopic repair which requires skills and learning under supervision of experienced surgeons.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshio Shiraishi ◽  
Tetsuro Tominaga ◽  
Takashi Nonaka ◽  
Kiyoaki Hamada ◽  
Masato Araki ◽  
...  

AbstractSingle-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has the potential to improve perioperative outcomes, including less postoperative pain, shorter operation time, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stay. However, SILS is technically difficult and needs a longer learning curve. Between April 2016 and September 2019, a total of 198 patients with clinical stage I/II right colon cancer underwent curative resection. In the case of the SILS approach, an organ retractor was usually used to overcome SILS-specific restrictions. The patients were divided into two groups by surgical approach: the SILS with organ retractor group (SILS-O, n = 33) and the conventional laparoscopic surgery group (LAC, n = 165). Clinical T status was significantly higher in the LAC group (p = 0.016). Operation time was shorter and blood loss was lower in the SILS-O group compared to the LAC group (117 vs. 197 min, p = 0.027; 10 vs. 25 mL, p = 0.024, respectively). In the SILS-O group, surgical outcomes including operation time, blood loss, number of retrieved lymph nodes, and postoperative complications were not significantly different between those performed by experts and by non-experts. Longer operation time (p = 0.041) was significantly associated with complications on univariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratio 2.514, 95%CI 1.047–6.035, p = 0.039). SILS-O was safe and feasible for right colon cancer. There is a potential to shorten the learning curve of SILS using an organ retractor.


Medicine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (26) ◽  
pp. e3982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Woo Kim ◽  
Yun Dae Han ◽  
Ha Yan Kim ◽  
Hyuk Hur ◽  
Byung Soh Min ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yu Han ◽  
Yajie Zhang ◽  
Wentian Zhang ◽  
Jie Xiang ◽  
Kai Chen ◽  
...  

Summary This study aimed to demonstrate the learning curve of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE). A retrospective analysis of the first 124 consecutive patients who underwent RAMIE with intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis) by a single surgeon between May 2015 and August 2020 was performed. An risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) analysis was applied to generate a learning curve of RAMIE considering the major complication rate, which reflected the technical proficiency. The overall 30-day morbidity rate was 38.7%, while the major complication rate was 25.8%. The learning curve was divided into two phases based on the RA-CUSUM analysis: phase I, the initial learning phase (cases 1–51) and phase II, the proficiency phase (cases 52–124). As we compared the proficiency phase with the initial learning phase, significantly decreased trends were observed in relation to the major complication rate (37.3% vs. 18.7%, P = 0.017), total operation time (330.9 ± 55.6 vs. 267.3 ± 39.1 minutes, P &lt; 0.001), and length of hospitalization (10 [IQR, 9–14] days vs. 9 [IQR, 8–11] days, P = 0.034). In conclusion, the learning curve of RAMIE consisted of two phases, and at least 51 cases were required to gain technical proficiency.


2018 ◽  
pp. 107-110
Author(s):  
Aren Mayilyan ◽  
Levon Hovsepyan

Build tools have been studied in Java environment, and a comparable analysis has been done according to the following parameters: initial learning curve, the speed of different builds, complexity, plugins, documentation and community, developer tools integrity.


Cornea ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 806-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Cesário Pereira ◽  
José Álvaro Pereira Gomes ◽  
Aline Silveira Moriyama ◽  
Luis Fernando Chaves ◽  
Adriana dos Santos Forseto

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document