An Invited Commentary “Prognostic effect of the new 5-factor modified frailty index in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy with regional anesthesia - A prospective cohort study”

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 130-131
Author(s):  
Hualei Chen ◽  
Julius Wedam Atogebania
2002 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 737-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.A. Safar ◽  
B. Doobay ◽  
G. Evans ◽  
K. Kazemi ◽  
A. Jahromi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Andreas Engvig ◽  
Torgeir Bruun Wyller ◽  
Eva Skovlund ◽  
Marc Vali Ahmed ◽  
Trygve Sundby Hall ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Study associations between frailty, illness severity and post-discharge survival in older adults admitted to medical wards with acute clinical conditions. Methods Prospective cohort study of 195 individuals (mean age 86; 63% females) admitted to two medical wards with acute illness, followed up for all-cause mortality for 20 months after discharge. Ward physicians screened for frailty and quantified its degree from one to eight using Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), while clinical illness severity was estimated by New Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) and laboratory illness severity was calculated by a frailty index (FI-lab) using routine blood tests. Results CFS, NEWS2 and FI-lab scores were independently associated with post-discharge survival in an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model with age, ward category (acute geriatric and general medical) and comorbidity as covariates. Adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were 1.54 (1.24–1.91) for CFS, 1.12 (1.03–1.23) for NEWS2, and 1.02 (1.00–1.05) for FI-lab. A frailty × illness severity category interaction effect (p = 0.003), suggested that the impact of frailty on survival was greater in those experiencing higher levels of illness severity. Among patients with at least moderate frailty (CFS six to eight) and high illness severity according to both NEWS2 and FI-lab, two (13%) were alive at follow-up. Conclusion Frailty screening aided prognostication of survival following discharge in older acutely ill persons admitted to medical wards. The prognostic value of frailty increased when combined with readily available illness severity markers acquired during admission.


2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip D. St. John ◽  
Suzanne L. Tyas ◽  
Lauren E. Griffith ◽  
Verena Menec

ABSTRACTBackground:Both physical frailty and cognitive impairment predict death, but the joint effect of these two factors is uncertain. The objectives are to determine if the Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and the Frailty Index (FI) predict death over a five-year interval after accounting for the effect of the other; and if there is an interaction in this effect.Methods:An analysis of an existing prospective cohort study of 1,751 community living older adults followed over a five-year time frame. Age, gender, and education were self-reported. The predictor variables were the FI – a measure of frailty based on the “Accumulation of Deficits” model of frailty; and the MMSE. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed for the outcome of time to death.Results:The unadjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) (95% CI) for mortality was 2.17 (1.69, 2.80) for those who were only cognitively impaired, 2.02 (1.53, 2.68) for those who were only frail, and 3.57 (2.75, 4.62) for those who were both frail and cognitively impaired with the reference group of those who were neither frail nor cognitively impaired. Adjusted for age, gender, and education, the HR (95% CI) was 1.49 (1.13. 1.95) for those who were only cognitively impaired, 1.81 (1.35, 2.41) for those who were only frail, and 2.28 (1.69, 3.09) for those who were both frail and cognitively impaired.Conclusions:Both frailty and cognitive impairment are predictors of mortality and the effect is cumulative. There was no interaction in this effect.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. e650-e660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junning Fan ◽  
Canqing Yu ◽  
Yu Guo ◽  
Zheng Bian ◽  
Zhijia Sun ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. rapm-2019-100773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rollin M Gallagher ◽  
Rosemary C Polomano ◽  
Nicholas A Giordano ◽  
John T Farrar ◽  
Wensheng Guo ◽  
...  

BackgroundNo studies have examined the long-term benefits of regional anesthesia (RA) for pain management after combat-related injury. The objective of this prospective cohort study was to examine the relationship between RA administration and patient-reported pain-related outcomes among Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) service members sustaining a combat-related extremity injury.MethodsBetween 2007 and 2013, n=358 American military personnel injured in OEF/OIF were enrolled at two military treatment facilities. Individuals were followed for up to 2 years after injury. Cohorts were defined based on whether participants were administered RA within 7 days after sustaining a combat-related injury, or not. Linear mixed effects models examined the association between RA and average pain intensity. Secondary outcomes included pain relief, pain interference, neuropathic pain symptoms, treatment outcomes related to pain management, and mental health symptoms.ResultsReceiving early RA was associated with improved average pain over the first 6 months after injury (β=−0.57; p=0.012) adjusting for injury severity and length of stay at the primary treatment facility. This difference was observed up to 24 months after injury (β=−0.36; p=0.046). Individuals receiving early RA reported greater pain relief, improved neuropathic pain intensity, and higher satisfaction with pain outcomes; however, by 24 months, mean scores did not significantly differ between cohorts.ConclusionFindings indicate that when administered soon after traumatic injury, RA is a valuable pain management intervention. Future longitudinal studies investigating the timely delivery of RA for optimal pain management in civilian trauma settings are needed.Trial registration numberNCT00431847


Author(s):  
Mika Kivimaki ◽  
Marko Elovainio ◽  
Jussi Vahtera ◽  
Marianna Virtanen ◽  
Jane E. Ferrie

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document