scholarly journals Prospective cohort study examining the use of regional anesthesia for early pain management after combat-related extremity injury

2019 ◽  
pp. rapm-2019-100773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rollin M Gallagher ◽  
Rosemary C Polomano ◽  
Nicholas A Giordano ◽  
John T Farrar ◽  
Wensheng Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Extremity Injury ◽  
Average Pain

BackgroundNo studies have examined the long-term benefits of regional anesthesia (RA) for pain management after combat-related injury. The objective of this prospective cohort study was to examine the relationship between RA administration and patient-reported pain-related outcomes among Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) service members sustaining a combat-related extremity injury.MethodsBetween 2007 and 2013, n=358 American military personnel injured in OEF/OIF were enrolled at two military treatment facilities. Individuals were followed for up to 2 years after injury. Cohorts were defined based on whether participants were administered RA within 7 days after sustaining a combat-related injury, or not. Linear mixed effects models examined the association between RA and average pain intensity. Secondary outcomes included pain relief, pain interference, neuropathic pain symptoms, treatment outcomes related to pain management, and mental health symptoms.ResultsReceiving early RA was associated with improved average pain over the first 6 months after injury (β=−0.57; p=0.012) adjusting for injury severity and length of stay at the primary treatment facility. This difference was observed up to 24 months after injury (β=−0.36; p=0.046). Individuals receiving early RA reported greater pain relief, improved neuropathic pain intensity, and higher satisfaction with pain outcomes; however, by 24 months, mean scores did not significantly differ between cohorts.ConclusionFindings indicate that when administered soon after traumatic injury, RA is a valuable pain management intervention. Future longitudinal studies investigating the timely delivery of RA for optimal pain management in civilian trauma settings are needed.Trial registration numberNCT00431847

scholarly journals Towards Opioid-Free Elective Spine Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahilan Sivaganesan ◽  
Amanda Wright ◽  
Regis W Haid ◽  
Praveen V Mummaneni ◽  
Richard Berkman
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Multivariate Regression ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Average Pain ◽  
Student’S T

Abstract INTRODUCTION The opioid crisis is a national emergency. We conducted a prospective cohort study to determine whether elective spine surgery can be performed without any opioids whatsoever. METHODS Every consecutive elective spine surgery performed by author R.A.B. between January 1st and December 31st of 2018 was included. For cohort A, between January and April 15th, opioids were minimized but PRN doses were given. For cohort B, between April 15th and December, the goal was to eliminate opioids altogether. Pain scores were collected at discharge, 1 wk, and 1-mo follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were collected at baseline and at 3 mo for lumbar procedures. Emergency room visits and readmissions were tracked. Student's t-tests were used to compare pain scores and PROs, and multivariate regression analyses were performed to understand drivers of opioid use. RESULTS A total of 158 patients were included. In cohort A, 37.9% of patients took no opioids between PACU and 1 mo. Average pain scores were 5.2 in PACU and 2.5 at 1 mo. In cohort B, 86.7% took no opioids after PACU. Average pain scores were 4.2 in PACU and 2.5 at 1 mo. Both cohorts had equivalent improvements in PROs. Multivariate regression revealed that, adjusting for case mix differences, cohort B had lower odds of opioid use after PACU (P < .0001). Moreover, preoperative opioid use is a driver of postoperative opioid use (P = .02), whereas procedure type/invasiveness is not. CONCLUSION We have shown that opioid-free spine surgery, including lumbar fusions, is feasible and effective. In all 87% of patients in our opioid-elimination cohort took no opioids from PACU until 1 mo after surgery, and 94% were taking none at the 1-mo visit. Pain scores and PROs were favorable. We have also shown that preoperative opioids are a driver of postoperative opioid use, however procedural invasiveness is not.

Pain management and medical interventions during childbirth among perinatal distressed women and women dissatisfied in their partner relationship: A prospective cohort study

Midwifery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigridur Sia Jonsdottir ◽  
Thora Steingrimsdottir ◽  
Marga Thome ◽  
Guðmundur Kristjan Oskarsson ◽  
Linda Bara Lydsdottir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Partner Relationship ◽  
Medical Interventions

scholarly journals Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study

Critical Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Céline Gélinas ◽  
Mélanie Bérubé ◽  
Kathleen A. Puntillo ◽  
Madalina Boitor ◽  
Melissa Richard-Lalonde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Brain Injured

Abstract Background Pain assessment in brain-injured patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is challenging and existing scales may not be representative of behavioral reactions expressed by this specific group. This study aimed to validate the French-Canadian and English revised versions of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT-Neuro) for brain-injured ICU patients. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted in three Canadian and one American sites. Patients with a traumatic or a non-traumatic brain injury were assessed with the CPOT-Neuro by trained raters (i.e., research staff and ICU nurses) before, during, and after nociceptive procedures (i.e., turning and other) and non-nociceptive procedures (i.e., non-invasive blood pressure, soft touch). Patients who were conscious and delirium-free were asked to provide their self-report of pain intensity (0–10). A first data set was completed for all participants (n = 226), and a second data set (n = 87) was obtained when a change in the level of consciousness (LOC) was observed after study enrollment. Three LOC groups were included: (a) unconscious (Glasgow Coma Scale or GCS 4–8); (b) altered LOC (GCS 9–12); and (c) conscious (GCS 13–15). Results Higher CPOT-Neuro scores were found during nociceptive procedures compared to rest and non-nociceptive procedures in both data sets (p < 0.001). CPOT-Neuro scores were not different across LOC groups. Moderate correlations between CPOT-Neuro and self-reported pain intensity scores were found at rest and during nociceptive procedures (Spearman rho > 0.40 and > 0.60, respectively). CPOT-Neuro cut-off scores ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 were found to adequately classify mild to severe self-reported pain ≥ 1 and moderate to severe self-reported pain ≥ 5, respectively. Interrater reliability of raters’ CPOT-Neuro scores was supported with intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.69. Conclusions The CPOT-Neuro was found to be valid in this multi-site sample of brain-injured ICU patients at various LOC. Implementation studies are necessary to evaluate the tool’s performance in clinical practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document