Letter to the editor: Virtual reality in surgical training

2021 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 105935
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Thomas ◽  
Deepti Singh
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Varoquier ◽  
C. P. Hoffmann ◽  
C. Perrenot ◽  
N. Tran ◽  
C. Parietti-Winkler

Objective. To assess the face, content, and construct validity of the Voxel-Man TempoSurg Virtual Reality simulator. Participants and Methods. 74 ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeons participated. They were assigned to one of two groups according to their level of expertise: the expert group (n=16) and the novice group (n=58). The participants performed four temporal bone dissection tasks on the simulator. Performances were assessed by a global score and then compared to assess the construct validity of the simulator. Finally, the expert group assessed the face and content validity by means of a five-point Likert-type scale. Results. experienced surgeons performed better (p<.01) and faster (p<.001) than the novices. However, the groups did not differ in terms of bone volume removed (p=.11) or number of injuries (p=.37). 93.7% of experienced surgeons stated they would recommend this simulator for anatomical learning. Most (87.5%) also thought that it could be integrated into surgical training. Conclusion. The Voxel-Man TempoSurg Virtual Reality simulator constitutes an interesting complementary tool to traditional teaching methods for training in otologic surgery.


2018 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 1065-1072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeshwanth Pulijala ◽  
Minhua Ma ◽  
Matthew Pears ◽  
David Peebles ◽  
Ashraf Ayoub

Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Rogers ◽  
Anthony J. DeSantis ◽  
Haroon Janjua ◽  
Tara M. Barry ◽  
Paul C. Kuo

2021 ◽  
pp. 9-16
Author(s):  
Alastair Konarski ◽  
Mike Williams ◽  
Ronnie Davies ◽  
Bibhas Roy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document