Abstract
Background Subaxial cervical spine injury especially in the elderly can be associated to severe complications and disability. Until today there is no consensus concerning the best operative treatment. A potential superiority of anterior or posterior fixation is the subject of controversial discussions.
Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of anterior and posterior fixation after subaxial cervical spine trauma in the elderly focussing on the postoperative mortality.
Material and Methods A retrospective cohort analysis was performed to analyse the data of 43 patients. Especially mortality data were collected.
Results A total of 43 patients was identified. Anterior fixation was performed in 21 patients, posterior fixation was performed in 22 patients. There were no significant differences between these groups. Although statistical significance was not reached, a slightly higher mortality was found among patients undergoing anterior fixation (52,4 vs. 31,8%). Furthermore the male sex, a higher age, translation injuries, long duration of operation and hospitalisation as well as postoperative complications were slightly associated to a higher mortality.
Conclusions Subaxial cervical spine trauma is associated to a high mortality in the elderly. Although neither anterior nor posterior fixation could show a significant superiority, every surgical decision making should be performed individually for each patient balancing the advantages and disadvantages of each method.
MDCT of acute subaxial cervical spine trauma: a mechanism-based approach
