scholarly journals An assessment of the compliance of Randomised controlled trials published in craniofacial surgery journals with the CONSORT statement: A systematic review protocol

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.R. Borrelli ◽  
R. Agha ◽  
T.E. Pidgeon
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darragh Rooney ◽  
Mark Ledwidge ◽  
Chris Watson ◽  
Joe Gallagher ◽  
Liam Glynn

Abstract BackgroundVaccination in children has reduced morbidity and mortality worldwide from infectious diseases. It has been suggested that vaccines have beneficial effects beyond the diseases they are designed to prevent. These are known as “non-specific effects” and include reductions in severity of illness and hospitalisation for illnesses other than those the vaccine is designed to prevent. This protocol will focus specifically on the non-specific effects of pneumococcal and haemophilus influenza vaccines in children under 5 years of age.MethodsWe will systematically search Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the European Union Clinical Trials Register and the clinicaltrials.gov databases using a broad range of search terms pertaining to pneumonia, morbidity, mortality and children to identify potentially relevant studies. These will be limited to randomised controlled trials, quasi randomised controlled trials and cohort studies in English. Two independent reviewers will conduct all levels of screening, data abstraction, and quality appraisal (using the Cochrane risk of bias tool). DiscussionOur results can be used by researchers and policy-makers to identify if there are non-specific effects of pneumococcal and haemophilus vaccines which should be explored further. The review will be also be of interest to patients and clinicians to determine if vaccines have beneficial effects beyond the illnesses they are designed to prevent.Systematic review registrationThe systematic review protocol is registered with the PROSPERO database, Registration number: CRD42020146640.


2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. PS1-PS8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chara Ntala ◽  
Panagiota Birmpili ◽  
Allison Worth ◽  
Niall H Anderson ◽  
Aziz Sheikh

BMJ Open ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. e005155-e005155 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. G. Tolsgaard ◽  
C. Ku ◽  
N. N. Woods ◽  
K. M. Kulasegaram ◽  
R. Brydges ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mar Achalandabaso Boira ◽  
Robert Memba ◽  
Yasir Bashir ◽  
Mihai Calin Pavel ◽  
Erik Llacer ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundLaparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the standard surgical approach in the treatment of cholelithiasis. The rate of bile duct injury increased significantly during the initial period of its implementation. Diverse surgical techniques and different imaging modalities have been described to provide enhanced views of the biliary anatomy and potentially prevent or early detect bile duct injuries. Both x-ray intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) and Near infra-red indocyanine green fluorescent cholangiography (NIR-ICG) have been described as safe and feasible techniques to assess biliary anatomy. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate if NIR-ICG can visualise extrahepatic biliary anatomy more efficiently and safer than IOC in minimally invasive cholecystectomy for gallstone disease.MethodsLiterature search will be performed via Medline (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and web of science. All randomised controlled clinical trials and prospective non-randomised controlled trials which report on comparison of NIR-ICG versus IOC will be included. All patients over 18 years old who require elective or urgent minimally invasive cholecystectomy (undergoing NIR-ICG during this procedure) due to gallstone disease both acute and chronic will be included. Primary outcomes will be ability to visualise extrahepatic biliary anatomy and time to obtain relevant images of the biliary tree.DiscussionOur research expects to give the reader a clear sense of the needed focus of future research and remaining uncertainties in the field. Understanding the benefits of this technique is critical to ensuring policymakers can make informed decisions as to where preventive efforts should be focused regarding specific imaging techniques. If ICG is proven to be faster and non-invasive, routine use could be encouraged and wide implementation could be a reality. Systematic review registrationIn accordance with the guidelines, our systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), registration number CRD42020177991.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document