41.1 Hearing the Whole Story: Peer-to-Peer Parent Support in Primary Care

Author(s):  
Karen Martinez
2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 864-870
Author(s):  
María Ángeles Otero ◽  
Chang-Hai Liu ◽  
Javier Ampuero ◽  
Rocío Llorca ◽  
Manuel Vargas ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 815-820
Author(s):  
Andrew D Pinto ◽  
Monica Da Ponte ◽  
Madeleine Bondy ◽  
Amy Craig-Neil ◽  
Kathleen Murphy ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Financial strain is a key social determinant of health. As primary care organizations begin to explore ways to address social determinants, peer-to-peer interventions hold promise. Objective Our objective was to evaluate a peer-to-peer intervention focussed on financial empowerment delivered in primary care, in partnership with a social enterprise. Methods This intervention was hosted by a large primary care organization in Toronto, Canada. Participants were recruited within the organization and from local services. We organized three separate groups who met over 10 weekly in-person, facilitated sessions: millennials (age 19–29) no longer in school, precariously employed adults (age 30–55) and older adults near retirement (age 55–64). We applied principles of adult education and peer-to-peer learning. We administered surveys at intake, at exit and at 3 months after the intervention, and conducted three focus groups. Results Fifty-nine people took part. At 3 months, participants had sustained higher rates of optimism about their financial situation (54% improved from baseline), their degree of control (55% improved) and stress around finances (50% improved). In focus groups, participants reported greater understanding of their finances, that they were not alone in struggling with finances, and that it was useful to meet with others. One group continued to meet for several months after the intervention. Conclusions In this study, a peer-to-peer intervention helped address a key social determinant of health, likely through reducing stigma, providing group support and creating a space to discuss solutions. Primary care can host these interventions and help engage potential participants.


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 580-580
Author(s):  
Andrew D Pinto ◽  
Monica Da Ponte ◽  
Madeleine Bondy ◽  
Amy Craig-Neil ◽  
Kathleen Murphy ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. S293
Author(s):  
M.Á. Otero-Fernández ◽  
R. Llorca ◽  
J. Ampuero ◽  
A. Martinez-Alcala ◽  
M. Vargas-Perez ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. S616
Author(s):  
R. Llorca Fernandez ◽  
M.A. Otero Fernández ◽  
J. Ampuero ◽  
M.C. Rico ◽  
B. Fombuena ◽  
...  

MedEdPublish ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryann K. Overland ◽  
Ximena Levander ◽  
Marissa Black ◽  
Ginger Evans

2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 489-524
Author(s):  
Brent Pollitt

Mental illness is a serious problem in the United States. Based on “current epidemiological estimates, at least one in five people has a diagnosable mental disorder during the course of a year.” Fortunately, many of these disorders respond positively to psychotropic medications. While psychiatrists write some of the prescriptions for psychotropic medications, primary care physicians write more of them. State legislatures, seeking to expand patient access to pharmacological treatment, granted physician assistants and nurse practitioners prescriptive authority for psychotropic medications. Over the past decade other groups have gained some form of prescriptive authority. Currently, psychologists comprise the primary group seeking prescriptive authority for psychotropic medications.The American Society for the Advancement of Pharmacotherapy (“ASAP”), a division of the American Psychological Association (“APA”), spearheads the drive for psychologists to gain prescriptive authority. The American Psychological Association offers five main reasons why legislatures should grant psychologists this privilege: 1) psychologists’ education and clinical training better qualify them to diagnose and treat mental illness in comparison with primary care physicians; 2) the Department of Defense Psychopharmacology Demonstration Project (“PDP”) demonstrated non-physician psychologists can prescribe psychotropic medications safely; 3) the recommended post-doctoral training requirements adequately prepare psychologists to prescribe safely psychotropic medications; 4) this privilege will increase availability of mental healthcare services, especially in rural areas; and 5) this privilege will result in an overall reduction in medical expenses, because patients will visit only one healthcare provider instead of two–one for psychotherapy and one for medication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document