2.19 Efficacy Measures in an Open-Label Dose-Optimization Study of an Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension in Children With ADHD

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (10) ◽  
pp. S164-S165
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Cutler ◽  
Antonio Pardo ◽  
Thomas R. King ◽  
Judith C. Kando ◽  
Barry K. Herman
CNS Spectrums ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 218-219
Author(s):  
Andrew Cutler ◽  
Antonio Pardo ◽  
Thomas R. King ◽  
Judith C. Kando ◽  
Barry K. Herman

AbstractObjectivesReport the efficacy of open-label amphetamine extended-release oral suspension (AMPH EROS) for the treatment of children with ADHD.AMPH EROS has a 1-hr onset of effect and a duration of action of 13hours and was approved by FDA for treatment of ADHD in children aged 6–17 years based on a double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy and safety study in children aged 6–12 years with ADHD. A significant treatment difference in change from pre-dose SKAMP-combined score was observed at the primary endpoint of 4hours post-dose (p<0.0001) and each post-dose time point assessed (1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13hours).Data reported here are from the 5-week, open-label dose optimization period. These efficacy data support the primary endpoint result.MethodsMales and females aged 6 to 12 years with ADHD enrolled and began open-label treatment with 2.5 mg or 5mg/day of AMPH EROS titrated in 2.5–10mg/day increments until optimal dose (maximum 20mg/day). Doses could be decreased for tolerability. Subjects took morning AMPH EROS for 5weeks. Other efficacy outcomes during the open-label dose optimization phase: ADHD-RS (ADHD-Rating Scale), CGI-S (Clinical Global Impression of Severity), CGI-I (CGI-of Improvement) and CPRS (Conners’ Parent Rating Scale). All subjects were assessed for safety.ResultsFor the ITT population (n=99): treatment with AMPH EROS was associated with a mean change in ADHD-RS-IV (baseline to end of the open-label dose optimization; week 6) of 28.2 (±9.03) (Baseline score = 41.3±7.95). 90.9% of subjects had a change from baseline to open-label week 6 of ≥50% in the ADHD-RS-IV total score and were defined as responders. The CGI-S scores decreased continuously from baseline, with a high 4.8 at baseline to a low of 2.0 at open-label week 6. The percentage of subjects classified as moderately ill or greater correspondingly decreased from 97% at Baseline to 1% at open-label week 6. The decrease in the CGI-I over the study was similar to the change in CGI-S scores. CPRS for most categories decreased continuously from Baseline to open-label week 6. Mean change from baseline to open-label week 6 on the CPRS inattention T-score subscale was –25.3 (±14.38) and –24.4 (±13.87).Adverse events (>5%) reported during dose optimization were decreased appetite, insomnia, affect lability, upper abdominal pain, mood swings and headache.ConclusionAMPH EROS was effective in reducing symptoms of ADHD in this open-label dose optimization. The AE profile of AMPH EROS was consistent with those of other amphetamine products.Funding Acknowledgements: This work was funded by Tris Pharma, Inc.


2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 639-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Huss ◽  
Ylva Ginsberg ◽  
Torben Arngrim ◽  
Alexandra Philipsen ◽  
Katherine Carter ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. S288-S289
Author(s):  
Barry K. Herman ◽  
Andrea Marraffino ◽  
Judith C. Kando ◽  
Thomas R. King ◽  
Antonio Pardo ◽  
...  

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-163
Author(s):  
Antonio Pardo ◽  
Mohammed Bouhajib ◽  
Eman Rafla ◽  
Thomas R. King ◽  
Judith C. Kando

AbstractPurposeThis open-label, single-dose, randomized, two-period, two-treatment, two-sequence, crossover study evaluated the comparative bioavailability between amphetamine extended-release oral suspension (treatment A: AMPH EROS, Dyanavel XR 2.5 mg/mL, 18.8 mg amphetamine base per 7.5 mL) and extended-release mixed amphetamine salts (treatment B: ER MAS, Adderall XR 30 mg capsules, equivalent to 18.8 mg amphetamine base per capsule) after a single dose in healthy adult subjects, under fasted conditions.MethodsThe crossover design allowed for intra-subject PK comparisons. Relative comparable bioavailability was determined by a statistical comparison of the AUC and Cmax parameters for both d- and l-amphetamine, where the geometric mean ratios for AUC and Cmax were within the 90% confidence limits (80.0%–125.0%) to determine comparable bioavailability between test products. Subjects in sequence 1 received treatment A followed by B; subjects in sequence 2 received treatment B followed by treatment A. PK samples were obtained at 0 (pre-dose) through 60 hours post-dose. The safety assessment was based on reported frequency and severity of adverse events.ResultsThirty (30) subjects were enrolled and 28 completed. The mean age of subjects was 35 years, with a mean BMI of 25.9 kg/m2. Most subjects were Male (63.3%) and Black (56.7%). The geometric mean ratios for Cmax and all AUC measurements were within the 80–125% bound indicating comparable bioavailability between both test products. Both test products were generally well-tolerated with no serious AEs reported.ConclusionsThe bioavailability of a single 7.5 mL dose of AMPH EROS 2.5 mg/mL was comparable to a single 30 mg capsule dose of ER MAS. AMPH EROS (both d- and l-amphetamine) showed equivalent peak and overall exposure to ER MAS under fasted conditions.FundingTris Pharma, Inc.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document