scholarly journals Ideal Cardiovascular Health Score and Fuster-BEWAT Score as Predictors of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Classification

2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 581-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haoyu Wang ◽  
Guozhe Sun ◽  
Zhao Li ◽  
Xiaofan Guo ◽  
Yingxian Sun
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy ◽  
Ventricular Hypertrophy ◽  
Cardiovascular Health ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Health Score ◽  
Ideal Cardiovascular Health

Association of a favorable cardiovascular health profile (Life"s Simple 7 and Fuster-BEWAT scores) with the presence of a newly proposed 4-tiered left ventricular hypertrophy

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
HY Wang ◽  
YX Sun
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy ◽  
Ventricular Hypertrophy ◽  
Cardiovascular Health ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Health Study ◽  
Cardiovascular Health Study ◽  
Funding Sources ◽  
End Diastolic Volume ◽  
C Statistic

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background AHA"s Life"s Simple 7 cardiovascular health score is recommended for use in primary prevention. Simpler tools not requiring laboratory tests, such as the Fuster-BEWAT score (FBS) (blood pressure [B], exercise [E], weight [W], alimentation [A], and tobacco [T]), are also available. Purpose This study sought to compare the effectiveness of Life"s Simple 7 and FBS in predicting the newly proposed 4-tiered left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) classification based on LV dilatation (high LV end-diastolic volume [EDV] index) and concentricity (mass/end-diastolic volume [M/EDV]0.67) in the general Chinese population. Methods Participants from Northeast China Rural Cardiovascular Health study who underwent cardiac echocardiography (n = 11,261) were enrolled. Patients with LVH were divided into 4 groups—eccentric nondilated (normal M/EDV and EDV), eccentric dilated (increased EDV, normal M/EDV), concentric nondilated (increased M/EDV, normal EDV), and concentric dilated (increased M/EDV and EDV)—and compared with patients with normal LVM. Results With poor Life"s Simple 7 and FBS as references, individuals with ideal Life"s Simple 7 and FBS showed lower adjusted odds of having eccentric nondilated (Life"s Simple 7, odds ratio [OR]: 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20 to 0.34 vs. FBS, OR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.38), eccentric dilated (OR: 0.73 [0.57-0.94] vs. OR: 0.57 [0.43-0.76]), concentric nondilated (OR: 0.12 [0.04-0.38] vs. OR: 0.19 [0.07-0.52]), and concentric dilated LVH (OR: 0.12 [0.03-0.37] vs. OR: 0.26 [0.10-0.72]). Taken together, the odds for these 4 LV geometric phenotypes decreased in a graded manner in subjects with intermediate and ideal ICHS and FBS compared with subjects with poor ICHS and FBS (p for trend <0.01). For the total ICHS and FBS on a continuous scale from 0 (all 7 poor) to 7 (all 7 ideal), risk reductions of the 4 distinct LVH patterns were of comparable magnitude for each 1-point increment of ICHS and FBS. Similar levels of significantly discriminating accuracy were found for Life"s Simple 7 and FBS with respect to the eccentric nondilated (C-statistic: 0.737; 95% CI: 0.725 to 0.750 vs. 0.731; 95% CI: 0.718 to 0.744, respectively), eccentric dilated (0.684 [0.670-0.699] vs. 0.686 [0.671-0.701]), concentric nondilated (0.658 [0.624-0.692] vs. 0.650 [0.615-0.684]), and concentric dilated LVH (0.711 [0.678-0.744] vs. 0.698 [0.663-0.733]). Conclusions  Our findings demonstrate that the FBS appears capable of performing just as well as does the Life"s Simple 7 in predicting the novel 4-group classification of LVH, making the FBS particularly suited as a reliable low-cost indicator of CV health in settings where access to laboratory analysis is limited and health care resources are constrained. Abstract Figure.

Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-15
Author(s):  
Steven L. Demeter
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy ◽  
Ventricular Hypertrophy ◽  
Left Ventricular Mass Index ◽  
Medical Science ◽  
Careful Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Hypertensive Disease ◽  
Accurate Analysis ◽  
Clear Explanation

Abstract The fourth, fifth, and sixth editions of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) use left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) as a variable to determine impairment caused by hypertensive disease. The issue of LVH, as assessed echocardiographically, is a prime example of medical science being at odds with legal jurisprudence. Some legislatures have allowed any cause of LVH in a hypertensive individual to be an allowed manifestation of hypertensive changes. This situation has arisen because a physician can never say that no component of LVH was not caused by the hypertension, even in an individual with a cardiomyopathy or valvular disorder. This article recommends that evaluators consider three points: if the cause of the LVH is hypertension, is the examinee at maximum medical improvement; is the LVH caused by hypertension or another factor; and, if apportionment is allowed, then a careful analysis of the risk factors for other disorders associated with LVH is necessary. The left ventricular mass index should be present in the echocardiogram report and can guide the interpretation of the alleged LVH; if not present, it should be requested because it facilitates a more accurate analysis. Further, if the cause of the LVH is more likely independent of the hypertension, then careful reasoning and an explanation should be included in the impairment report. If hypertension is only a partial cause, a reasoned analysis and clear explanation of the apportionment are required.

The association of ankle brachial index with left ventricular hypertrophy and left ventricular mass index: the Dong-gu study

VASA ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 284-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong-Woo Choi ◽  
Hye-Yeon Kim ◽  
Hye-Ran Ahn ◽  
Young-Hoon Lee ◽  
Sun-Seog Kweon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy ◽  
Left Ventricular Mass ◽  
Ventricular Hypertrophy ◽  
Left Ventricular Mass Index ◽  
Ankle Brachial Index ◽  
Intima Media Thickness ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Baseline Survey ◽  
Ventricular Mass Index ◽  
Ventricular Mass

Background: To investigate the association between ankle-brachial index (ABI), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in a general population. Patients and methods: The study population consisted of 8,246 people aged 50 years and older who participated in the baseline survey of the Dong-gu Study conducted in Korea between 2007 and 2010. Trained research technicians measured LV mass using mode M ultrasound echocardiography and ABI using an oscillometric method. Results: After adjustment for risk factors and common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT) and the number of plaques, higher ABIs (1.10 1.19, 1.20 - 1.29, and ≥ 1.30) were significantly and linearly associated with high LVMI (1.10 - 1.19 ABI: β, 3.33; 95 % CI, 1.72 - 4.93; 1.20 - 1.29 ABI: β, 6.51; 95 % CI, 4.02 - 9.00; ≥ 1.30 ABI: β, 14.83; 95 % CI, 6.18 - 23.48). An ABI of 1.10 - 1.19 and 1.20 - 1.29 ABI was significantly associated with LVH (1.10 - 1.19 ABI: OR, 1.35; 95 % CI, 1.19 - 1.53; 1.20 - 1.29 ABI: OR, 1.59; 95 % CI, 1.31 - 1.92) and ABI ≥ 1.30 was marginally associated with LVH (OR, 1.73; 95 % CI, 0.93 - 3.22, p = 0.078). Conclusions: After adjustment for other cardiovascular variables and CCA-IMT and the number of plaques, higher ABIs are associated with LVH and LVMI in Koreans aged 50 years and older.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document