Structure of peanut major allergen Ara h 3

2009 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. S228-S228
Author(s):  
Y. Zhang ◽  
T. Jin ◽  
A. Howard ◽  
Y. Chen
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (40) ◽  
pp. 11219-11229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Chen ◽  
Huan Ma ◽  
Yuelong Li ◽  
Heqiao Wang ◽  
Abdus Samad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 262-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrizia Restani ◽  
Cinzia Ballabio ◽  
Emanuela Corsini ◽  
Alessandro Fiocchi ◽  
Patrizia Isoardi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (8-9) ◽  
pp. 1796-1804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tengchuan Jin ◽  
Feng Guo ◽  
Yu-wei Chen ◽  
Andrew Howard ◽  
Yu-Zhu Zhang

2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-421
Author(s):  
Qiu-feng CAI ◽  
Xi-chang WANG ◽  
Guang-ming LIU ◽  
Zhi-hu LUO ◽  
Min-jie CAO
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Englert ◽  
Vera Mahler ◽  
Andreas Bonertz

Abstract Purpose of Review Medicinal products for allergen immunotherapy (AIT) of food allergies have gained enormous momentum in recent years. With this new class of products entering marketing authorization procedures, compliance to regulatory requirements becomes a critical element. Here, an overview is provided on specific requirements and aspects concerning the quality control and manufacturing of these products. Recent Findings Recent developments in the field of AIT for food allergies are divers, including products for oral, epicutaneous, and subcutaneous application, most notably targeting egg, milk, and peanut allergy. As the source materials for food AIT product are typically produced for food consumption and not for medicinal purposes, unique challenges arise in the manufacturing processes and controls of these medicinal products. Individual approaches are needed to assure acceptable quality, including control of relevant quantitative and qualitative characteristics. Major characteristics for quality verification include determination of protein content, total allergenic activity, and major allergen content. The applied manufacturing processes need to be established such that relevant process parameters are kept within justified limits and consistency of produced batches is assured. Summary Allergen products for food AIT present specific challenges with respect to quality aspects that differentiate them from other commonly available AIT products. While established regulation is available and provides clear guidance for most aspects, other issues require consideration of new and individual settings relevant here. Consequently, as experience grows, respective amendments to currently available guidance may be needed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Shaymaviswanathan Karnaneedi ◽  
Roger Huerlimann ◽  
Elecia B. Johnston ◽  
Roni Nugraha ◽  
Thimo Ruethers ◽  
...  

Shellfish allergy affects 2% of the world’s population and persists for life in most patients. The diagnosis of shellfish allergy, in particular shrimp, is challenging due to the similarity of allergenic proteins from other invertebrates. Despite the clinical importance of immunological cross-reactivity among shellfish species and between allergenic invertebrates such as dust mites, the underlying molecular basis is not well understood. Here we mine the complete transcriptome of five frequently consumed shrimp species to identify and compare allergens with all known allergen sources. The transcriptomes were assembled de novo, using Trinity, from raw RNA-Seq data of the whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei), black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon), banana shrimp (Fenneropenaeus merguiensis), king shrimp (Melicertus latisulcatus), and endeavour shrimp (Metapenaeus endeavouri). BLAST searching using the two major allergen databases, WHO/IUIS Allergen Nomenclature and AllergenOnline, successfully identified all seven known crustacean allergens. The analyses revealed up to 39 unreported allergens in the different shrimp species, including heat shock protein (HSP), alpha-tubulin, chymotrypsin, cyclophilin, beta-enolase, aldolase A, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PD). Multiple sequence alignment (Clustal Omega) demonstrated high homology with allergens from other invertebrates including mites and cockroaches. This first transcriptomic analyses of allergens in a major food source provides a valuable resource for investigating shellfish allergens, comparing invertebrate allergens and future development of improved diagnostics for food allergy.


BMC Genomics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ai Sasou ◽  
Yoshikazu Yuki ◽  
Ayaka Honma ◽  
Kotomi Sugiura ◽  
Koji Kashima ◽  
...  

Abstract Background We have previously developed a rice-based oral vaccine against cholera diarrhea, MucoRice-CTB. Using Agrobacterium-mediated co-transformation, we produced the selection marker–free MucoRice-CTB line 51A, which has three copies of the cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) gene and two copies of an RNAi cassette inserted into the rice genome. We determined the sequence and location of the transgenes on rice chromosomes 3 and 12. The expression of alpha-amylase/trypsin inhibitor, a major allergen protein in rice, is lower in this line than in wild-type rice. Line 51A was self-pollinated for five generations to fix the transgenes, and the seeds of the sixth generation produced by T5 plants were defined as the master seed bank (MSB). T6 plants were grown from part of the MSB seeds and were self-pollinated to produce T7 seeds (next seed bank; NSB). NSB was examined and its whole genome and proteome were compared with those of MSB. Results We re-sequenced the transgenes of NSB and MSB and confirmed the positions of the three CTB genes inserted into chromosomes 3 and 12. The DNA sequences of the transgenes were identical between NSB and MSB. Using whole-genome sequencing, we compared the genome sequences of three NSB with three MSB samples, and evaluated the effects of SNPs and genomic structural variants by clustering. No functionally important mutations (SNPs, translocations, deletions, or inversions of genic regions on chromosomes) between NSB and MSB samples were detected. Analysis of salt-soluble proteins from NSB and MSB samples by shot-gun MS/MS detected no considerable differences in protein abundance. No difference in the expression pattern of storage proteins and CTB in mature seeds of NSB and MSB was detected by immuno-fluorescence microscopy. Conclusions All analyses revealed no considerable differences between NSB and MSB samples. Therefore, NSB can be used to replace MSB in the near future.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kavita Reginald ◽  
Chye Ling Tan ◽  
Simin Chen ◽  
Liling Yuen ◽  
Sock Yong Goh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document