Nanoemulsion adjuvant–driven redirection of TH2 immunity inhibits allergic reactions in murine models of peanut allergy

2018 ◽  
Vol 141 (6) ◽  
pp. 2121-2131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica J. O'Konek ◽  
Jeffrey J. Landers ◽  
Katarzyna W. Janczak ◽  
Rishi R. Goel ◽  
Anna M. Mondrusov ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
pp. AB175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica J. O'Konek ◽  
Jeffrey J. Landers ◽  
Katarzyna W. Janczak ◽  
Pamela T. Wong ◽  
James R. Baker

2013 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. AB95
Author(s):  
Laurie M. McWilliams ◽  
Michael D. Kulis ◽  
Rishu Guo ◽  
A. Wesley Burks ◽  
Patrick Seed

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-34
Author(s):  
Amal H. Assa’ad

Oral food challenge (OFC) is a procedure that is conducted most commonly by allergist/immunologists in their office or in food allergy centers to confirm a food allergy or to confirm tolerance to the food. The procedure as conducted in clinical practice is mostly open food challenge and, in research, a double-blind, placebo controlled food challenge. OFC has associated risks that can be minimized by having the challenges conducted by trained personnel who are prepared to treat allergic reactions and who have rescue medications available. However, OFCs have tremendous benefits to the patients and their families, including the potential to determine that a food is no longer an allergen and can be introduced into the diet. Even OFCs that result in clinical reactions have the benefit of confirming the food allergy and demonstrating the therapeutic effect of the rescue medications. The study of the outcomes of OFC has shed light on food allergy reactions and characteristics of the patients with food allergy as well as on the value of other diagnostic tests compared with OFC. OFCs have helped establish food allergy thresholds, confirm that subjects enrolled in research studies have the allergy, and demonstrate the response to the therapies tested in terms of ameliorating the allergic response or raising the reaction threshold. OFCs have also been used to promote the recent guidelines for the prevention of peanut allergy by identifying the infants at risk for peanut allergy but who are not allergic yet.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 669-674
Author(s):  
Sarah S. Smith ◽  
Olga Hilas

Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Allergen Powder-dnfp (Palforzia, Aimmune™ Therapeutics, Inc.; Brisbane, CA) is the first FDA-approved oral immunotherapy indicated for the mitigation of allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, in patients with peanut allergy. It may be initiated in individuals 4 to 17 years of age and continued for maintenance in those 4 years of age and older. Initiation and dose titration require a stepwise approach and the supervision of a health care professional. Patients taking Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Allergen Powder-dnfp should also follow a peanut-avoidant diet. In addition, patients should have an injectable epinephrine product in case of drug-related anaphylaxis. Commonly reported adverse reactions include gastrointestinal, respiratory, and dermatologic manifestations that are frequently associated with allergic reactions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona I. Kidon ◽  
Soad Haj Yahia ◽  
Diti Machnes-Maayan ◽  
Yael Levy ◽  
Shirli Frizinsky ◽  
...  

Peanut allergy is an increasing concern in younger children. Available bedside diagnostic tools, i.e., prick tests with commercial extracts or peanut-containing foods have only limited predictive values. In a cohort of preschoolers with both a history of allergic reactions and sensitization to peanut proteins, we aimed to characterize the impact of skin tests with a novel composition of peanuts LPP-MH. Almost one quarter (27/110) of preschool children, with a history of allergic reactions to peanuts and positive standard IgE-mediated tests for peanut allergy, can tolerate the reintroduction of peanut proteins into their diet after resolving their allergy and, thus, can avoid adverse health outcomes associated with the false diagnosis. In the younger age group, a quarter of peanut allergic children, display a relatively high threshold, potentially enabling an easier and safer oral immunotherapy protocol in this window of opportunity in childhood. The use of the novel diagnostic skin test, LPP-MH, significantly improves the predictive value of outpatient evaluation for the outcomes of peanut challenge as well as the expected threshold at which the PA child will react, thus, making for a better informed decision of how, when, and where to challenge.


2002 ◽  
Vol 110 (6) ◽  
pp. 915-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjolein Wensing ◽  
André H. Penninks ◽  
Susan L. Hefle ◽  
Stef J. Koppelman ◽  
Carla A.F.M. Bruijnzeel-Koomen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-63
Author(s):  
Margitta Worm ◽  
Wojciech Francuzik ◽  
Sabine Dölle ◽  
Lars Lange ◽  
Aikaterina Alexiou

AbstractPeanut allergy is a potentially life-threatening disease because it leads to severe allergic reactions, especially in children but also in adults. So far, allergen avoidance is the most effective therapy for treating peanut allergy. In this article, current developments of peanut allergy specific immunotherapy are critically discussed based on the existing literature. These include sublingual, epicutaneous and oral peanut immunotherapy. Nonspecific treatment approaches with new-targeted antibodies such as anti-IgE (omalizumab) or anti-IL-4/IL-13 receptor antibodies (dupilumab) can also be used to treat peanut allergy with regard to the mode of action of these antibodies. Multiple studies are already available for omalizumab and are currently performed with dupilumab. Whether and which therapies for the treatment of peanut allergy will be available on the market in the future is not only relevant in terms of clinical effectiveness in the sense of a long-term stable increase in the threshold level, but also in terms of the tolerability in everyday life of affected patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Wang

Background: Peanut allergy affects up to 2% of the general population and carries not only the risk of potentially life-threatening allergic reactions but also negatively impacts day to day life for patients and their families. Advances in knowledge in immunotherapy is providing families with options for proactive treatment. Objective: To examine the available data for oral immunotherapy (OIT) and epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) for peanut allergy. Methods: This review discusses recent studies that evaluated the safety and efficacy of OIT and EPIT to induce desensitization to peanut and identifies factors that should be considered when guiding families in treatment decisions. Results: Results of studies have demonstrated that immunotherapy can raise the threshold of peanut allergen to induce allergic reactions for many patients, thereby potentially reducing the risk for allergic reactions and decreasing the daily burden of peanut allergy. However, adverse reactions, which range from mild to severe, are possible with immunotherapy. Shared decision-making will be important to determine the best approach for peanut allergy management for each individual and his or her family. Conclusion: OIT and EPIT will offer patients and families more options for managing peanut allergies. Recent data from phase III studies on OIT and EPIT as well as real-world data on OIT advance the understanding of the efficacy and safety of these approaches. On-going studies aim to identify biomarkers to enhance patient selection criteria as well as develop additional therapeutic approaches.


2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 3-10
Author(s):  
L M Ogorodova ◽  
O S Fedorova ◽  
M M Fedotova ◽  
T A Evdokimova

Allergy to peanuts is an actual problem of practical health care associated with a significant prevalence and severity of peanut-allergic reactions, which can include anaphylaxis. The characteristic of peanut allergen components is presented in the review. Modern approaches to the diagnosis of allergy to peanuts reflected in the article. The article presents research findings on development and natural history of allergy to peanuts, clinical mmanifestations, also considered the priority therapeutic approaches.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document