Outcome of food intake and nutritional status after discontinuation of a cow’s-milk-free diet post negative oral food challenge in infants and children

Objective: To evaluate the outcome of food intake and nutritional status post discontinuation of a cow’s-milk-free diet after a negative oral food challenge.Methods: This was a prospective, uncontrolled study that evaluated food intake and nutritional status of a cohort of 80 infants and children under 5 years of age. Food intake and nutritional status were evaluated on the day of the oral food challenge test and after 30 days. Weight and height were measured on the day of the test and after 30 days.Results: The mean age of the patients was 18.7 ± 12.4 months, and 58.7% were male. After discontinuation of the elimination diet, the children showed daily intake increases in (P < 0.001), protein (P < 0.001), carbohydrates (P = 0.042), calcium from foods (P < 0.001), calcium from foods and supplements (P < 0.001), phosphorus (P < 0.001), and vitamin D from foods (P = 0.006). The Z-scores (n = 76) on the day of the oral food challenge test and 30 days after restarting the consumption of cow’s milk were as follows: weight-for-age (P < 0.001) and height-for-age (P < 0.001), respectively.Conclusion: Cow’s milk protein in the diet was associated with increased intake of energy, proteins, carbohydrates, calcium, phosphorus, and vitamin D, in addition to an increase in the Z-scores for weight-for-age and height-for-age.

Alternative Fish Species for Nutritional Management of Children with Fish-FPIES—A Clinical Approach

In the Mediterranean region, fish is a common cause of food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) in children. No laboratory tests specific to FPIES are available, and oral food challenge (OFC) is the gold standard for its diagnosis and testing for achievement of tolerance. Children with FPIES to fish are usually advised to avoid all fish, regardless of the species. Fish are typically classified into bony and cartilaginous, which are phylogenetically distant species and therefore contain less cross-reacting allergens. The protein β-parvalbumin, considered a pan-allergenic, is found in bony fish, while the non-allergenic α-parvalbumin is commonly found in cartilaginous fish. Based on this difference, as a first step in the therapeutic process of children with FPIES caused by a certain fish in the bony fish category (i.e., hake, cod, perch, sardine, gilthead sea bream, red mullet, sole, megrim, sea bass, anchovy, tuna, swordfish, trout, etc.), an OFC to an alternative from the category of cartilaginous fish is suggested (i.e., blue shark, tope shark, dogfish, monkfish, skate, and ray) and vice versa. Regarding the increased mercury content in some sharks and other large species, the maximum limit imposed by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for weekly mercury intake must be considered. An algorithm for the management of fish-FPIES, including alternative fish species, is proposed.

Clinical Features of Wheat Allergy Are Significantly Different between Tri a 14 Sensitized Patients and Tri a 19 Sensitized Ones

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Wheat is the most important cereal for human nutrition but its high consumption is associated to an increasing complaint of wheat-related disorders, many of which are allergic in nature and different in respect to the involved allergens. In this study, we compared the clinical aspects of wheat allergy presented by patients sensitized to Tri a 19 in respect to those presented by patients sensitized to Tri a 14. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> With this aim, we selected patients sensitized to 1 or both of the 2 allergens, and among these we identified those who were really wheat allergic and reactive on the basis of a standardized methodology. We evaluated the clinical features such as the kind and severity of symptoms, the coexistence of triggering factors such as physical exercise and NSAIDs and alcohol consumption, and the association with other allergens and with various immunologic parameters. Wheat allergy in Tri a 19 sensitized patients was confirmed through a questionnaire while the patients sensitized to Tri a 14 underwent wheat challenge with 100 g of pasta followed by exercise on a treadmill. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Seventy-nine patients sensitized to Tri a 14 and 40 patients sensitized to Tri a 19 were recruited. The 2 sensitizations were independent with a significant inverse relation (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.00001). The Tri a 19 sensitized patients presented, in respect to the Tri a 14 sensitized ones, an older age (<i>p</i> = 0.0017), a higher risk to be wheat allergic (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001), a higher severity of the reactions (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.00001) and a higher association with some cofactors, namely alcohol (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0005) and physical exercise (<i>p</i> = 0.003). On the contrary, Tri a 14 sensitization was associated with atopy (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001), with a higher probability of patients being asymptomatic (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001) and being sensitized to other foods, in particular to nuts and cereals (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.00001). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Sensitization to Tri a 19 or Tri a 14 determines different clinical pictures. In particular, sensitization to Tri a 19 implies a higher probability of severe reactions, even dependent on daily triggers, while that to Tri a 14 implies a higher cross-reactivity with other foods but it’s more frequently asymptomatic, making a food challenge necessary to prevent useless food avoidance.

Threshold of Reactivity and Tolerance to Precautionary Allergen-Labelled Biscuits of Baked Milk- and Egg-Allergic Children

Extremely sensitive food-allergic patients may react to very small amounts of allergenic foods. Precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) warns from possible allergenic contaminations. We evaluated by oral food challenge the reactivity to a brand of PAL-labelled milk- and egg-free biscuits of children with severe milk and egg allergy. We explored the ability of proteomic methods to identify minute amounts of milk/egg allergens in such biscuits. Traces of milk and/or egg allergens in biscuits were measured by two different liquid-chromatography-mass spectrometry methods. The binding of patient’s serum with egg/milk proteins was assessed using immunoblotting. None of the patients reacted to biscuits. Egg and milk proteins were undetectable with a limit of detection of 0.6 µg/g for milk and egg (method A), and of 0.1 and 0.3 µg /g for milk and egg, respectively (method B). The immunoblots did not show milk/egg proteins in the studied biscuits. Milk/egg content of the biscuits is far lower than 4 µg of milk or egg protein per gram of product, the minimal doses considered theoretically capable of causing reactions. With high sensitivity, proteomic assessments predict the harmlessness of very small amount of allergens in foods, and can be used to help avoiding unnecessary PAL.

Milk and cow’s meat allergy in a child: A clinical case

Allergy to bovine serum albumin is the main predictor of beef allergy associated with cow’s milk proteins allergy. We report a case of a 3-year-old child with cow’s milk proteins allergy since the age of 6 months who, after some ingestions of beef, developed episodes of irritability, urticaria and syncope. Specific IgE to beef, oral food challenge with medium rare cooked beef and specific IgE to bovine serum albumin were all positive, but an oral food challenge with well cooked beef was tolerated. Allergy to bovine serum albumin is not usually associated with severe reactions, since it is a thermolabile protein, however, the process of cooking meat may be insufficient to have an effect on the complex matrix of meat and associated serum albumins. The irregular pattern of the episodes and the previous diagnosis of cow’s milk proteins allergy may act as confounding factors leading to a delayed diagnosis.

White paper peanut allergy—part 2: Diagnosis of peanut allergy with special emphasis on molecular component diagnostics

Summary Background Peanut allergy is an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated immune response that usually manifests in childhood and can range from mild skin reactions to anaphylaxis. Since quality of life maybe greatly reduced by the diagnosis of peanut allergy, an accurate diagnosis should always be made. Methods A selective literature search was performed in PubMed and consensus diagnostic algorithms are presented. Results Important diagnostic elements include a detailed clinical history, detection of peanut-specific sensitization by skin prick testing and/or in vitro measurement of peanut (extract)-specific IgE and/or molecular components, and double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge as the gold standard. Using these tools, including published cut-off values, diagnostic algorithms were established for the following constellations: 1) Suspicion of primary peanut allergy with a history of immediate systemic reaction, 2) Suspicion of primary peanut allergy with questionable symptoms, 3) Incidental findings on sensitization testing and peanut ingestion so far or 4) Suspicion of pollen-associated peanut allergy with solely oropharyngeal symptoms. Conclusion The most important diagnostic measures in determining the diagnosis of peanut allergy are clinical history and detection of sensitizations, also via component-based diagnostics. However, in case of unclear results, the gold standard—an oral food challenge—should always be used.