Focused Process Improvement Events: Sustainability of Impact on Process and Performance in an Academic Radiology Department

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew B. Rosenkrantz ◽  
Kirk Lawson ◽  
Rosina Ally ◽  
David Chen ◽  
Frank Donno ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 663-668
Author(s):  
Karen A. Buch ◽  
Dania Daye ◽  
Monica J. Wood ◽  
Carmen Alvarez ◽  
Marcela G. del Carmen ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moritz F. Kircher ◽  
Andrew Hines-Peralta ◽  
Phillip M. Boiselle ◽  
Kevin Donohoe ◽  
Bettina Siewert

2016 ◽  
Vol 207 (6) ◽  
pp. 1171-1175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L. Francavilla ◽  
Elizabeth Kagan Arleo ◽  
Edward I. Bluth ◽  
Christopher M. Straus ◽  
Sravanthi Reddy ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Vitória Lachowski Volochtchuk ◽  
Higor Leite

PurposeThe healthcare system has been under pressure to provide timely and quality healthcare. The influx of patients in the emergency departments (EDs) is testing the capacity of the system to its limit. In order to increase EDs' capacity and performance, healthcare managers and practitioners are adopting process improvement (PI) approaches in their operations. Thus, this study aims to identify the main PI approaches implemented in EDs, as well as the benefits and barriers to implement these approaches.Design/methodology/approachThe study is based on a rigorous systematic literature review of 115 papers. Furthermore, under the lens of thematic analysis, the authors present the descriptive and prescriptive findings.FindingsThe descriptive analysis found copious information related to PI approaches implemented in EDs, such as main PIs used in EDs, type of methodological procedures applied, as well as a set of barriers and benefits. Aiming to provide an in-depth analysis and prescriptive results, the authors carried out a thematic analysis that found underlying barriers (e.g. organisational, technical and behavioural) and benefits (e.g. for patients, the organisation and processes) of PI implementation in EDs.Originality/valueThe authors contribute to knowledge by providing a comprehensive review of the main PI methodologies applied in EDs, underscoring the most prominent ones. This study goes beyond descriptive studies that identify lists of barriers and benefits, and instead the authors categorize prescriptive elements that influence these barriers and benefits. Finally, this study raises discussions about the behavioural influence of patients and medical staff on the implementation of PI approaches.


2020 ◽  
pp. 084653712091081
Author(s):  
Darya Kurowecki ◽  
Bruce B. Forster ◽  
Michael N. Patlas

Purpose: The purpose of this survey was to identify current and projected subspecialty employment needs across Canadian academic radiology practices. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to academic radiology department heads within the faculties of medicine at Canadian universities between September and October 2019. Respondents identified the number of partnership track radiologists hired in the last academic year, the number of fellowship-trained new hires, and the top 3 subspecialties for new and prospective hires. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Results: Nine academic radiology department heads responded to the survey (75% response rate) with good regional representation across Canada. Ninety-five percent of new hires within the last academic year were subspecialty fellowship trained. The top subspecialties for new hires in the last year were abdominal imaging and interventional neuroradiology, with 77.8% and 44.4% of academic leaders reporting them as one of the top 3 subspecialties, respectively. The top 3 subspecialties for prospective hires in the next academic year included musculoskeletal imaging (n = 6, 66.7%), followed by abdominal imaging (n = 5, 55.6%), with pediatric radiology (n = 3, 33.3%) and cardiothoracic imaging (n = 3, 33.3%) tying for third place. There was some variability in the subspecialty needs for hires between regions. Conclusions: The survey results provide valuable information about the current and future subspecialty needs of academic radiology practices. The data obtained can provide guidance to trainees regarding fellowship training options that will optimize their future employability.


Author(s):  
Farley Simon Nobre ◽  
Andrew M. Tobias ◽  
David S. Walker

This chapter is concerned with the implementation of The Capability Maturity Model in the organization of study. In this application, we define measures of organization process improvement and we propose correlations between them and organizational cognition. Among these measures are included organization process maturity, capability, and performance. Therefore, we define correlations between organizational cognition and organization process maturity, and also between organizational cognition and organization process capability and performance. From such correlations, we also define an association between organizational cognition and organizational learning. Hence, we outline new directions to the development of approaches to assess, to evaluate and to measure the degree of organizational cognition from appraisal methods of The Capability Maturity Model and of other organization process improvement models. Moreover, Chapter IX is complemented by Appendix I which summarizes concepts and characteristics about the five maturity levels of The Capability Maturity Model.


Author(s):  
Vibhor Wadhwa ◽  
Surbhi Raichandani ◽  
George K. Vilanilam ◽  
Dane Van Tassel ◽  
Scott Jorgensen ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 288 (3) ◽  
pp. 693-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bettina Siewert ◽  
Suzanne Swedeen ◽  
Olga R. Brook ◽  
Ronald L. Eisenberg ◽  
Mary Hochman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document