Emerging themes in using narrative in geriatric care: Implications for patient-centered practice and interprofessional teamwork

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 177-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip G. Clark
Healthcare ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer ◽  
Lee Revere ◽  
Mariya Tankimovich ◽  
Erica Yu ◽  
Robert Spears ◽  
...  

Interprofessional education (IPE) typically involves clinical simulation exercises with students from medical and nursing schools. Yet, healthcare requires patient-centered teams that include diverse disciplines. Students from public health and informatics are rarely incorporated into IPE, signaling a gap in current educational practices. In this study, we integrated students from administrative and non-clinical disciplines into traditional clinical simulations and measured the effect on communication and teamwork. From July 2017–July 2018, 408 students from five schools (medicine, nursing, dentistry, public health, and informatics) participated in one of eight three-hour IPE clinical simulations with Standardized Patients and electronic health record technologies. Data were gathered using a pre-test–post-test interventional Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) and through qualitative evaluations from Standardized Patients. Of the total 408 students, 386 (94.6%) had matched pre- and post-test results from the surveys. There was a 15.9% improvement in collaboration overall between the pre- and post-tests. ICCAS competencies showed improvements in teamwork, communication, collaboration, and conflict management, with an average change from 5.26 to 6.10 (t = 35.16; p < 0.001). We found by creating new clinical simulations with additional roles for non-clinical professionals, student learners were able to observe and learn interprofessional teamwork from each other and from faculty role models.


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracy Humphrey ◽  
Janet S. Tucker ◽  
Claire de Labrusse

BACKGROUND: The Scottish Women’s Handheld Maternity Record (SWHMR) contains an innovative element of co-construction by inviting women to write in their notes. It aims to support communication and patient-centered care (PCC). The study aims were (a) to describe women’s contribution to the SWHMR, (b) compare the characteristics of women who do/do not contribute, and (c) assess the influence of women’s contributions on their care.METHODS: An exploratory study using mixed methods approach extracted data from a series of 300 casenotes. Women’s contributions were analyzed by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics using descriptive statistics. Content analysis was used to identify themes within women’s written text.RESULTS: Women were more likely to contribute to sections about personal details, health-life style than birth preferences/management. Primiparous, women residing in urban areas or receiving midwife-led care were more likely to contribute. Only half of the women who expressed their preferences for birth were judged to have been met. Most of women’s contributions mapped to PCC’s domains and other emerging themes were identified.CONCLUSIONS: Women’s contribution to the SWHMR varied widely and substantial groups of women may be disadvantaged. Co-constructed handheld records need further evaluation to ensure that they do support communication and PCC.


2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 416-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Spinewine ◽  
Ariane Mouzon ◽  
Olivia Dalleur ◽  
Marie de Saint Hubert ◽  
Pascale Cornette ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 417-417
Author(s):  
Ruth D. Piers ◽  
Karen J. J. Versluys ◽  
Johan Devoghel ◽  
André Vyt ◽  
Nele Van Den Noortgate

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (9) ◽  
pp. 2064-2070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth D. Piers ◽  
Karen J. J. Versluys ◽  
Johan Devoghel ◽  
Sophie Lambrecht ◽  
André Vyt ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Parry ◽  
Eric A. Coleman ◽  
Jodi D. Smith ◽  
Janet Frank ◽  
Andrew M. Kramer

2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 449-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamran Moradi ◽  
Atena Rahmati Najarkolai ◽  
Fatemeh Keshmiri

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna L. Stollings ◽  
John W. Devlin ◽  
Brenda T. Pun ◽  
Kathleen A. Puntillo ◽  
Tamra Kelly ◽  
...  

The ABCDEF bundle (A, assess, prevent, and manage pain; B, both spontaneous awakening and spontaneous breathing trials; C, choice of analgesic and sedation; D, delirium: assess, prevent, and manage; E, early mobility and exercise; and F, family engagement and empowerment) improves intensive care unit patient-centered outcomes and promotes interprofessional teamwork and collaboration. The Society of Critical Care Medicine recently completed the ICU Liberation ABCDEF Bundle Improvement Collaborative, a 20-month, multicenter, national quality improvement initiative that formalized dissemination and implementation strategies to promote effective adoption of the ABCDEF bundle. The purpose of this article is to describe 8 of the most frequently asked questions during the Collaborative and to provide practical advice from leading experts to other institutions implementing the ABCDEF bundle.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document