The Institute of Medicine (IOM) Report, the Mental Health and Substance Use Workforce for Older Adults: In Whose Hands? A Road Map for the Future of Our Field

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. S35-S36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Kirwin ◽  
Dan Blazer ◽  
Stephen Bartels ◽  
Frederic C. Blow ◽  
Gary Gottlieb
2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 1039-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Steffens

In the United States, there are signs that we are coming to terms with the growing healthcare needs of older Americans. Over the past decade, exploding Medicare costs and the federal budget deficit have forced medical professionals, policy-makers, and other stakeholders to consider the consequences of an aging population. The US Congress commissioned a report from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) on the physical healthcare needs of the elderly adults and the geriatric healthcare workforce required to meet them, resulting in the 2008 IOM report Retooling for an Aging America: Building the Health Care Workforce (IOM, 2008). Following this report, Congress recognized that the work was not finished and that more information was needed about mental health and substance use (MH/SU) disorders in older Americans. The IOM was commissioned by Congress to convene a committee to study and report on the workforce needed to care for this group. In 2012, the IOM released The Mental Health and Substance Use Workforce for Older Adults: In Whose Hands? (IOM, 2012).


2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger G. Kathol ◽  
Steve Melek ◽  
Byron Bair ◽  
Susan Sargent

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark É Czeisler ◽  
Alexandra Drane ◽  
Sarah S Winnay ◽  
Emily R Capodilupo ◽  
Charles A Czeisler ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesTo estimate the prevalence of unpaid caregiving during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and to identify factors associated with adverse mental health symptoms, substance use, and suicidal ideation in this population, which provides critical support in health care systems by providing care to older adults and those with chronic conditions.MethodsIn June 2020, Internet-based surveys with questions about demographics, caregiving responsibilities, and mental health were administered to US adults aged ≥18 years. Demographic quota sampling and survey weighting to improve cross-sectional sample representativeness of age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Prevalence ratios for adverse mental health symptoms were estimated using multivariable Poisson regressions.ResultsOf 9,896 eligible invited adults, 5,412 (54.7%) completed surveys; 5,011 (92.6%) respondents met screening criteria and were analysed, including 1,362 (27.2%) caregivers. Caregivers had higher prevalences of adverse mental health symptoms than non-caregivers, including anxiety or depressive disorder symptoms (57.6% vs 21.5%, respectively, p<0.0001) having recently seriously considered suicide (33.4% vs 3.7%, p<0.0001). Symptoms were more common among caregivers who were young vs older adults (e.g., aged 18–24 vs ≥65 years, aPR 2.75, 95% CI 1.95–3.88, p<0.0001), Hispanic or Latino vs non-Hispanic White (1.14, 1.04–1.25, p=0.0044), living with vs without disabilities (1.18, 1.10–1.26, p<0.0001), and with moderate and high vs low Caregiver Intensity Index scores (2.31, 1.65–3.23; 2.81, 2.00–3.94; both p<0.0001). Suicidal ideation was more prevalent among non-Hispanic Black vs non-Hispanic White caregivers (1.48, 1.15–1.90, p=0.0022).ConclusionsCaregivers, who accounted for one in four US adult respondents in this nationally representative sample, more commonly reported adverse mental health symptoms than non-caregivers. Increased visibility of and access to mental health care resources are urgently needed to address mental health challenges of caregiving.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 276-277
Author(s):  
Julie Miller

Abstract Recent research suggests older adults may be uniquely able to cope and cultivate psychological resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic. This presentation will describe how the Lifestyle Leaders’ overall mental health (including worries and experiences of social isolation and loneliness) and thoughts about the future have changed throughout the pandemic, as well as the ways in which they remained resilient throughout. For example, a survey in March 2020 indicated that 68% of Lifestyle Leaders were very or extremely worried about COVID-19, compared to only 33% in November 2020. Interviews with Lifestyle Leaders revealed that the pandemic led many to engage in more focused thinking about their own mortality and, for some, presented or compounded challenges of older age (e.g., widowhood, downsizing, etc.). The presentation will also highlight ways in which Lifestyle Leaders’ past experiences and current activities have contributed to their mental health and fortitude during the ongoing pandemic.


1992 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Roberts

A nonlinear perspective on time (where the future exists in and affects the present) has been described by several theorists but there is little research on the extent, quality or origins of the personal future perspective. The present study examined the existence and origin of the future in the present by asking adults aged nineteen to eighty-three to: 1) project themselves into the oldest age imaginable, 2) describe their hopes and fears for that age, and 3) name role models for those hopes and fears. Data analysis revealed that length of future perspective, number of hopes and number of role models for the distant future declined with age. In addition, types of fears for the future varied with age, with older adults stressing dependency issues while younger adults reported concerns about personality and mental health. Despite age differences, most participants could name role models for both their hopes and fears for aging, but specific models were identified more often for hopes than for fears. Personalized hopes and fears for the distant future as motivators for the present are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document