Ionic conductivities of Na–Ge–P glass ceramics as solid electrolyte

2015 ◽  
Vol 633 ◽  
pp. 246-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chong Li ◽  
Shan Jiang ◽  
Jing-wen Lv ◽  
Tao Zheng
2021 ◽  
Vol 372 ◽  
pp. 115769
Author(s):  
K. Waetzig ◽  
J. Schilm ◽  
C. Heubner ◽  
K. Nikolowski ◽  
M. Partsch

2010 ◽  
Vol 156-157 ◽  
pp. 799-802
Author(s):  
Ming Zhou ◽  
Yan Wen Tian

This experiment composes irreversible cells using ultrafine electrolyte materials and platinum slices, to measure the ionic conductivity the cells at normal temperatures with the help of impedance 1286 spectroscopy. We have calculated the ionic conductivities, which indicate that the ionic conductivities of the merchant LaF3 polycrystalline powder and the powder by microwave method are higher than the ones of LaF3 crystal and the powder by Sol-Gel method, to achieve 10-6 Scm-1, so, they are better ionic conductors at normal temperature and can be used as sensor base materials. The experimental data show that O- participates in ionic conduction.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Culver ◽  
Alex Squires ◽  
Nicolo Minafra ◽  
Callum Armstrong ◽  
Thorben Krauskopf ◽  
...  

<p>Identifying and optimizing highly-conducting lithium-ion solid electrolytes is a critical step towards the realization of commercial all–solid-state lithium-ion batteries. Strategies to enhance ionic conductivities in solid electrolytes typically focus on the effects of modifying their crystal structures or of tuning mobile-ion stoichiometries. A less-explored approach is to modulate the chemical-bonding interactions within a material to promote fast lithium-ion diffusion. Recently, the idea of a solid-electrolyte inductive effect was proposed, whereby changes in bonding within the solid-electrolyte host-framework modify the potential-energy landscape for the mobile ions, resulting in an enhanced ionic conductivity. This concept has since been invoked to explain anomalous conductivity trends in a number of solid electrolytes. Direct evidence for a solid-electrolyte inductive effect, however, is lacking—in part because of the challenge of quantifying changes in local bonding interactions within a solid-electrolyte host-framework. <a></a><a>Here, we consider the evidence for a solid-electrolyte inductive effect in the archetypal superionic lithium-ion conductor Li<sub>10</sub>Ge<sub>1−<i>x</i></sub>Sn<i><sub>x</sub></i>P<sub>2</sub>S<sub>12</sub>, using Rietveld refinements against high-resolution temperature-dependent neutron-diffraction data, Raman spectroscopy, and density functional theory calculations.</a> Substituting Ge for Sn weakens the {Ge,Sn}–S bonding interactions and increases the charge-density associated with the S<sup>2-</sup> ions. This charge redistribution modifies the Li<sup>+</sup> substructure causing Li<sup>+</sup> ions to bind more strongly to the host-framework S anions; which in turn modulates the Li-ion potential-energy surface, increasing local barriers for Li-ion diffusion. Each of these effects is consistent with the predictions of the solid-electrolyte inductive effect model. Density functional theory calculations further predict that this inductive effect occurs even in the absence of changes to the host-framework geometry due to Ge → Sn substitution. These results provide direct evidence in support of a measurable solid-electrolyte inductive effect and demonstrate its application as a practical strategy for tuning ionic conductivities in superionic lithium-ion conductors.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 332 ◽  
pp. 77-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiwei Luo ◽  
Chunchun Qin ◽  
Haozhang Liang ◽  
Taoyong Liu ◽  
Anxian Lu

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Culver ◽  
Alex Squires ◽  
Nicolo Minafra ◽  
Callum Armstrong ◽  
Thorben Krauskopf ◽  
...  

<p>Identifying and optimizing highly-conducting lithium-ion solid electrolytes is a critical step towards the realization of commercial all–solid-state lithium-ion batteries. Strategies to enhance ionic conductivities in solid electrolytes typically focus on the effects of modifying their crystal structures or of tuning mobile-ion stoichiometries. A less-explored approach is to modulate the chemical-bonding interactions within a material to promote fast lithium-ion diffusion. Recently, the idea of a solid-electrolyte inductive effect was proposed, whereby changes in bonding within the solid-electrolyte host-framework modify the potential-energy landscape for the mobile ions, resulting in an enhanced ionic conductivity. This concept has since been invoked to explain anomalous conductivity trends in a number of solid electrolytes. Direct evidence for a solid-electrolyte inductive effect, however, is lacking—in part because of the challenge of quantifying changes in local bonding interactions within a solid-electrolyte host-framework. <a></a><a>Here, we consider the evidence for a solid-electrolyte inductive effect in the archetypal superionic lithium-ion conductor Li<sub>10</sub>Ge<sub>1−<i>x</i></sub>Sn<i><sub>x</sub></i>P<sub>2</sub>S<sub>12</sub>, using Rietveld refinements against high-resolution temperature-dependent neutron-diffraction data, Raman spectroscopy, and density functional theory calculations.</a> Substituting Ge for Sn weakens the {Ge,Sn}–S bonding interactions and increases the charge-density associated with the S<sup>2-</sup> ions. This charge redistribution modifies the Li<sup>+</sup> substructure causing Li<sup>+</sup> ions to bind more strongly to the host-framework S anions; which in turn modulates the Li-ion potential-energy surface, increasing local barriers for Li-ion diffusion. Each of these effects is consistent with the predictions of the solid-electrolyte inductive effect model. Density functional theory calculations further predict that this inductive effect occurs even in the absence of changes to the host-framework geometry due to Ge → Sn substitution. These results provide direct evidence in support of a measurable solid-electrolyte inductive effect and demonstrate its application as a practical strategy for tuning ionic conductivities in superionic lithium-ion conductors.</p>


2020 ◽  
pp. 2141001
Author(s):  
Koji Kawada ◽  
Kimihiro Yamashita ◽  
Toshinori Okura

This study focused on the effect of Zr-inclusion on Na[Formula: see text] conduction properties of the newly developed glass–ceramic solid solutions of Na5FeSi4O[Formula: see text] and Na4ZrSi4O[Formula: see text]. We experimentally confirmed formation of an all proportional solid solution in the range of [Formula: see text]= 0 and 1.0 with the composition Na[Formula: see text]Fe[Formula: see text]Zr[Formula: see text]Si4O[Formula: see text]. Glass–ceramic with a fast Na[Formula: see text]-conducting Na5YSi4O[Formula: see text]-type single phase was obtained in all the solid solutions. The conduction properties of the glass–ceramics were improved with increasing content of Zr, and Na4ZrSi4O[Formula: see text] was the most conductive glass–ceramic. The ionic conductivities were as high as 1.9 × 10[Formula: see text] S cm[Formula: see text] and 9.3 × 10[Formula: see text] S cm[Formula: see text] at temperatures of 25[Formula: see text]C and 300 [Formula: see text]C, respectively. The improved conductivity was attributed to the expansion of the conduction path by larger Zr ions replacing FeO6 octahedra.


MRS Advances ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (49) ◽  
pp. 2659-2664
Author(s):  
Bo Wang

ABSTRACTPolymer-mineral composite solid electrolytes have been prepared by hot pressing using lithium ion-exchanged bentonite (LIEB) and mineral derived LATSP (Li1.2Al0.1Ti1.9Si0.1P2.9O12) NASICON materials as solid electrolyte fillers in the polyethylene oxide (PEO) polymer containing LiTFSI salt. The mineral based solid electrolyte fillers not only increase ionic conductivity but also improve thermal stability. The highest ionic conductivities in the PEO-LIEB and PEO-LATSP composites were found to be 9.4×10-5 and 3.1×10-4 S·cm-1 at 40°C, respectively. The flexible, thermal stable and mechanical sturdy polymer-mineral composite solid electrolyte films can be used in the all-solid-state batteries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document