scholarly journals A National Review of Insurance Coverage of Noncancerous Breast Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol 233 (5) ◽  
pp. e11
Author(s):  
Marissa Klein ◽  
Michael Ha ◽  
Annie Yang ◽  
Ledibabari M. Ngaage ◽  
Sheri Slezak ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 232-237
Author(s):  
Marissa Klein ◽  
Michael Ha ◽  
Annie Yang ◽  
Ledibabari M. Ngaage ◽  
Sheri Slezak ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 78-78
Author(s):  
Nicholas L. Berlin ◽  
Adeyiza O. Momoh ◽  
Paul Abrahamse ◽  
Steven J. Katz ◽  
Reshma Jagsi ◽  
...  

78 Background: Despite mandated private insurance coverage for breast reconstruction following mastectomy, health care costs are increasingly passed onto women who seek these procedures through cost-sharing arrangements and high-deductible health plans. In this population-based study, we sought to characterize financial and employment toxicities related to pursuing breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Methods: Women (white, African American, and Latina-English and Spanish speaking) with early stage breast cancer (stages 0-II) diagnosed between July 2013 to September 2014 and who underwent mastectomy were identified through the Georgia and Los Angeles Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries and surveyed. Primary outcome measures included patient-reported appraisal of financial toxicity and employment status following breast cancer treatment using previously developed measures. Multivariable models evaluated the association between breast reconstruction and self-reported financial and employment status. Results: Among 868 breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy, 43.5% (n = 378) did not undergo breast reconstruction and 56.5% (n = 490) underwent reconstruction. 43.4% of the cohort reported being worse off financially since their diagnosis (49.4% with reconstruction vs. 35.0% without reconstruction, P< .001). Among women who were employed at time of breast cancer diagnosis (n = 535), 70.2% who underwent reconstruction reported being worse off regarding employment status compared to 51.1% who did not undergo reconstruction ( P< .001). Receipt of reconstruction was independently associated with a self-reported decline in financial status (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.1, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.4-3.4, P= .001). Similarly, reports of being worse off regarding employment status were also higher in those who underwent reconstruction vs. not (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-3.8, P= .006). Spanish-speaking Latina women more often reported being worse off regarding employment status (OR 4.3, 95% CI 2.1-9.0, P< .001) than white women. Conclusions: In this diverse cohort of women who underwent mastectomy for early stage breast cancer, women who elected to undergo reconstruction experienced more self-reported financial and employment toxicities. Patients should be counseled regarding the potential costs related to these procedures. Policy-makers should be aware of the financial barriers for women who undergo reconstruction despite mandatory insurance coverage in the United States.


JAMA ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 243 (23) ◽  
pp. 2398
Author(s):  
David G. Dibbell

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. e261-e269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetyana P. Shippee ◽  
Katy B. Kozhimannil ◽  
Kathleen Rowan ◽  
Beth A. Virnig

JAMA ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 243 (23) ◽  
pp. 2398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence M. Linkner

Author(s):  
Saeed Alqahtani ◽  
Mohammed Ahmedhani Kilani ◽  
Shahbaz Mansoor

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women in the Netherlands, and breast reconstruction is becoming a common surgical procedure for women who have had a mastectomy. Reconstruction post breast cancer treatment is covered by conditional reimbursement until 01-04-2020 as long as it as an autologous fat transplant. Conditional reimbursements are special legal exceptions under constant consideration by the Ministry of Health and require evidence on treatment and cost effectiveness to be moved to basic healthcare package. Surgeons at Maastricht UMC+ have developed sophisticated techniques for women that undergo a reconstruction surgery to recover sensitivity of the breasts. Improved sensitization would lead to a better quality of life and protect the skin against thermal and mechanical injuries. However, current health insurance coverage of breast reconstruction does not permit these additions. Furthermore, the reimbursement system in The Netherlands does not allow people to pay an extra fee for these additions.


JAMA ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 243 (23) ◽  
pp. 2398a-2398 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. M. Linkner

ASHA Leader ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 22-22
Author(s):  
Janet McCarty

ASHA documents can help you help clients win insurance coverage for certain voice treatments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document