Oral Anticoagulants for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Long Term Care: A Quality Improvement Initiative

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. B17
Author(s):  
Denis O'Donnell ◽  
Hrishikesh Navare ◽  
Denis O'Donnell ◽  
Evelyn Williams
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 413-414
Author(s):  
Lauren MacEachern ◽  
Yuting Song ◽  
Liane Ginsburg ◽  
Malcolm Doupe ◽  
Adrian Wagg ◽  
...  

Abstract Our understanding of the post-implementation sustainment, sustainability, and spread (SSS) of complex quality improvement interventions is limited. We explored factors that influenced the SSS of a care aide-led quality improvement initiative (Safer Care for Older Persons (in residential) Environments [SCOPE]) implemented in 6 Manitoba long-term care homes two years after the conclusion of SCOPE in 2017. We analyzed small group interview data collected from all unit- and facility-level managers who participated in SCOPE and were still working in these facilities. We asked about SCOPE implementation, post-SCOPE quality improvement activities, factors that influenced them, and about inter-unit spread of SCOPE following the project’s conclusion. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, de-identified, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Five of the 6 facilities reported sustained SCOPE quality improvement activities, tools, and facilitative structures. In the same 5 facilities, SCOPE benefits (e.g., increases in care aide empowerment and self-efficacy, manager belief in care aide capacity) continued post-implementation. Spread beyond the original SCOPE units had occurred in 3 facilities. Factors that influenced the SSS of SCOPE were related to the team (e.g., care aides' quality improvement capacity), to the unit and facility (e.g., culture of innovation and change), and to the long-term care system (e.g., competing imperatives). Some factors influencing SSS differ from factors known to influence implementation. The identified factors affecting SSS highlight the influence of social dynamics (i.e., interactions, communication, relationships) among staff on SSS. Further research is warranted to explore interactions among these influencing factors and how they lead to SSS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e001211
Author(s):  
Heather M Hanson ◽  
Tova Léveillé ◽  
Mollie Cole ◽  
Lesley JJ Soril ◽  
Fiona Clement ◽  
...  

BackgroundAntipsychotic medications are used to address neuropsychiatric symptoms associated with dementia. Evidence suggests that among older adults with dementia, their harms outweigh their benefits. A quality improvement initiative was conducted to address inappropriate antipsychotic medication use in long-term care (LTC) in the province of Alberta.MethodsWe conducted a multimethod evaluation of the provincial implementation of the project in 170 LTC sites over a 3-year project period incorporating a quasi-experimental before–after design. Using a three-component intervention of education and audit and feedback delivered in a learning workshop innovation collaborative format, local LTC teams were supported to reduce the number of residents receiving antipsychotic medications in the absence of a documented indication. Project resources were preferentially allocated to supporting sites with the highest baseline antipsychotic medication use. Changes in antipsychotic medication use, associated clinical and economic outcomes, and the effects of the project on LTC staff, physicians, leaders and administrators, and family members of LTC residents were assessed at the conclusion of the implementation phase.ResultsThe province-wide initiative was delivered with a 75% implementation fidelity. Inappropriate antipsychotic medication use declined from 26.8% to 21.1%. The decrease was achieved without unintended consequences in other outcomes including physical restraint use or aggressive behaviours. The project was more expensive but resulted in less inappropriate use of antipsychotics than the pre-project period (incremental cost per inappropriate antipsychotic avoided of $5 678.71). Accounts from family, organisational leaders, and LTC staff were supportive of the project activities and outcomes.ConclusionThis quality improvement initiative was successfully delivered across an entire delivery arm of the continuing care sector. Quality of care in LTC was improved.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 844-847
Author(s):  
David P. Calfee ◽  
Robert P. O’Neil ◽  
Quin Sylvester ◽  
Jared M. Bosk ◽  
Zeynep Sumer King ◽  
...  

AbstractA total of 38 long-term care facilities within a region participated in a 3-month quality improvement initiative focused on environmental cleaning and disinfection. Significant improvements in daily and discharge cleaning were observed during the project period. Further study of the sustainability and clinical impact of this type of initiative is warranted.


2021 ◽  
pp. 339-347
Author(s):  
Brenda Frie ◽  
Cynthia Graham ◽  
Alissa Hynes ◽  
Siri Dusek ◽  
Lecia Heinen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (12) ◽  
pp. 1053-1062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos H. Rojas-Fernandez ◽  
Joslin Goh ◽  
Jennifer Hartwick ◽  
Ruth Auber ◽  
Aein Zarrin ◽  
...  

Objective: To describe the quality of warfarin use in residents of long-term care facilities and investigate potential predictors oral anticoagulant use. Design: Retrospective chart review (August 2013 to September 2014). Setting: Thirteen long-term care (LTC) and assisted living facilities (ALF). Participants: Residents from LTC or ALF settings who ( a) received warfarin or direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and ( b) residents with a valid indication for oral anticoagulants such as atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, but were not receiving these drugs. Primary Outcome: Time in therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) range (TTR). Results: A total of 563 residents (70% female) with an average age of 85 years were identified. Participants had an average of 7.5 comorbidities and 9 medications. A total of 391 (69%) residents with indications for OACs were receiving such medications. Indications were atrial fibrillation (63%), venous or pulmonary embolism (16%), cardiac valves (0.4%); 26% did not have documented indications. Warfarin and DOACs were prescribed for 213 (38%) and 178 (32%) respectively, and 172 (31%) received no OACs The TTR ranged from 56%-75% (mean 63%). The frequency of INR determinations ranged from every 7 to 20 days, (mean 13 days) with no apparent relationship between frequency of testing and TTR. Conclusion: The TTR was higher (63.8%) than literature average (50%), but remains suboptimal given expected benefits of TTRs >75% versus TTRs circa 60%. Documentation of indications for OACs needs improvement, and it is possible that OACs are underused. Further work is necessary to understand how OAC use may be optimized in these facilities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document