Community structure of dasyurid marsupials in the arid Pilbara is consistent with a top-down system, their distribution and abundance depend on that of larger members of the guild

2022 ◽  
Vol 198 ◽  
pp. 104680
Author(s):  
Lorna Hernandez-Santin ◽  
Diana O. Fisher
Keyword(s):  
Oecologia ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 163 (2) ◽  
pp. 497-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer E. Smith ◽  
Cynthia L. Hunter ◽  
Celia M. Smith

1992 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 1734-1749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlene S. Evans

Recent changes in the Lake Michigan ecosystem provide a benchmark against which to reevaluate historic data. During the 1960s, the alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus) population exploded and then crashed. Offshore zoo-plankton data for the summers of 1954, 1966, and 1968 provided evidence that variations in alewife abundance had a major effect on zooplankton community structure. Based on these observations, other researchers have hypothesized that increased and decreased phytoplankton abundances during the 1960s as recorded at the Chicago water filtration plant were due to top-down effects rather than to phosphorus loading. This argument is reevaluated using two approaches. First, from the relationship between interannual variability in alewife and zooplankton species abundance during the summers of 1954, 1966, 1968, 1977, 1982, and 1984–87, I conclude that the effects of alewife predation on zooplankton community structure during the 1960s are less clear then originally proposed. Second, from estimates of Daphnia spp. grazing rates, considerations of the source of the long-term phytoplankton data used to support the top-down argument, regional differences in phytoplankton, zooplankton and alewife abundance trends, and historic water clarity observations, I conclude that existing data are insufficient to support the top-down argument that long-term trends in phytoplankton abundance were primarily affected by fluctuations in alewife abundance.


PeerJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. e4343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Pawlik ◽  
Tse-Lynn Loh ◽  
Steven E. McMurray

Interest in the ecology of sponges on coral reefs has grown in recent years with mounting evidence that sponges are becoming dominant members of reef communities, particularly in the Caribbean. New estimates of water column processing by sponge pumping activities combined with discoveries related to carbon and nutrient cycling have led to novel hypotheses about the role of sponges in reef ecosystem function. Among these developments, a debate has emerged about the relative effects of bottom-up (food availability) and top-down (predation) control on the community of sponges on Caribbean fore-reefs. In this review, we evaluate the impact of the latest findings on the debate, as well as provide new insights based on older citations. Recent studies that employed different research methods have demonstrated that dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and detritus are the principal sources of food for a growing list of sponge species, challenging the idea that the relative availability of living picoplankton is the sole proxy for sponge growth or abundance. New reports have confirmed earlier findings that reef macroalgae release labile DOC available for sponge nutrition. Evidence for top-down control of sponge community structure by fish predation is further supported by gut content studies and historical population estimates of hawksbill turtles, which likely had a much greater impact on relative sponge abundances on Caribbean reefs of the past. Implicit to investigations designed to address the bottom-up vs. top-down debate are appropriate studies of Caribbean fore-reef environments, where benthic communities are relatively homogeneous and terrestrial influences and abiotic effects are minimized. One recent study designed to test both aspects of the debate did so using experiments conducted entirely in shallow lagoonal habitats dominated by mangroves and seagrass beds. The top-down results from this study are reinterpreted as supporting past research demonstrating predator preferences for sponge species that are abundant in these lagoonal habitats, but grazed away in fore-reef habitats. We conclude that sponge communities on Caribbean fore-reefs of the past and present are largely structured by predation, and offer new directions for research, such as determining the environmental conditions under which sponges may be food-limited (e.g., deep sea, lagoonal habitats) and monitoring changes in sponge community structure as populations of hawksbill turtles rebound.


2009 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Mörk ◽  
Gustaf Lilliesköld Sjöö ◽  
Nils Kautsky ◽  
Tim R. McClanahan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Rousk ◽  
Lettice Hicks

<p>Understanding the role of ecological communities in maintaining multiple ecosystem processes is a central challenge in ecology. Soil microbial communities perform vital ecosystem functions, such as the decomposition of organic matter to provide plant nutrition. However, despite the functional importance of soil microorganisms, attribution of ecosystem function to particular constituents of the microbial community has been impeded by a lack of information linking microbial processes to community structure.</p><p>Here, we propose a new conceptual framework to determine how microbial communities influence ecosystem processes, by applying a “top-down” approach. Looking from the “top”, we first view the microbial community associated with a specific function as a whole, and describe the dependence of microbial community processes on environmental factors (e.g. the intrinsic temperature dependence of bacterial growth rates), allowing us to define the aggregate functional response curve of the community. We then demonstrate that the whole community contribution to ecosystem function can be predicted, by parameterising the functional response curve with current environmental conditions. In a final step, we show how this functional information can be linked to the taxonomic community composition (amplicon assessments of microbial community composition) in order to identify “biomarker” taxa that capture microbial communities’ regulation of ecosystem processes and the susceptibility of microbial community structure and function to environmental change. Ultimately, these biomarkers may be used as a diagnostic tool, enabling predictions of ecosystem function from community composition information combined with environmental metadata.</p>


2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 816-829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl-Emiliane T Chow ◽  
Diane Y Kim ◽  
Rohan Sachdeva ◽  
David A Caron ◽  
Jed A Fuhrman

1989 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald J. McQueen ◽  
Mark R. S. Johannes ◽  
John R. Post ◽  
Thomas J. Stewart ◽  
David R. S. Lean

Oecologia ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 132 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick T. Shears ◽  
Russell C. Babcock

Oecologia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 180 (1) ◽  
pp. 193-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laia Mestre ◽  
J. Piñol ◽  
J. A. Barrientos ◽  
X. Espadaler
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document