A new archaeobotanical proxy for plant food processing: Archaeological starch spherulites at the submerged 23,000-year-old site of Ohalo II

2021 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. 105465
Author(s):  
Monica N. Ramsey ◽  
Dani Nadel
Keyword(s):  
1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine I. Wright

Ground-stone tools and hunter-gatherer subsistence in late Pleistocene southwest Asia are examined in light of ethnographic and experimental data on processing methods essential for consumption of various plant foods. In general, grinding and pounding appear to be labor-intensive processing methods. In particular, the labor required to make wild cereals edible has been widely underestimated, and wild cereals were unlikely to have been “attractive” to foragers except under stress conditions. Levantine ground-stone tools were probably used for processing diverse plants. The earliest occurrence of deep mortars coincides with the glacial maximum, camp reoccupations, the onset of increasingly territorial foraging, and the earliest presently known significant samples of wild cereals. Two major episodes of intensification in plant-food processing can be identified in the Levant, coinciding respectively with the earliest evidence for sedentism (12,800-11,500 B.P.) and the transition to farming (11,500-9600 B.P.). The latter episode was characterized by rising frequencies of grinding tools relative to pounding tools, and suggests attempts to maximize nutritional returns of plants harvested from the limited territories characteristic of sedentary foraging and early farming. This episode was probably encouraged by the Younger Dryas, when density and storability of foods may have outweighed considerations of processing costs.


2015 ◽  
Vol 359-360 ◽  
pp. 77-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Revedin ◽  
Laura Longo ◽  
Marta Mariotti Lippi ◽  
Emanuele Marconi ◽  
Annamaria Ronchitelli ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 341 (1296) ◽  
pp. 163-175 ◽  

Gastroliths or ‘stomach stones’ occur frequently in some, but not all, groups of fossil and living m arine tetrapods. C om parative analysis of gastrolith distribution suggests a role in buoyancy control rather than food processing. Once accidental ingestion by bottom-feeding animals is excluded, gastroliths occur in most tetrapods which ‘fly’ underw ater with hydrofoil limbs, including plesiosaurs, penguins, and otariid pinnipeds, but not the m arine chelonians. They do not usually occur in cetaceans, ichthyosaurs, mosasaurs, and odobenid and phocid pinnipeds, which swim with a caudal fin or the equivalent. Occurrence in amphibious forms is variable; crocodilians often have gastroliths, but nothosaurs and placodonts do not. T he correlation of gastroliths and underw ater flight is corroborated by a com parative analysis which takes phylogenetic factors into account. There is no correlation with diet. Consideration of function and occurrence in terrestrial forms suggests that the use of gastroliths in digestion would not be useful, and might even be harmful, to a carnivorous m arine tetrapod. Gastroliths are more efficient than skeletal bone (as in pachyostosis) in terms of sinking force per unit of added mass or volume. As well as driftwood and ice, m arine tetrapods should be considered as a potential source of erratic stones in freshwater and marine sediments. Gastroliths may have evolved by the accidental ingestion of stones, the retention into adulthood of stones used by juveniles to process insect or plant food, or as a com pensatory replacem ent for dense bones habitually filling the stomach. Their presence or absence should be more carefully recorded and further studies should be carried out on their function.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 218-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Leonard ◽  
Pangzhen Zhang ◽  
Danyang Ying ◽  
Zhongxiang Fang

2014 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 2-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dietmar R. Kammerer ◽  
Judith Kammerer ◽  
Regine Valet ◽  
Reinhold Carle

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document