scholarly journals Does scale matter in community bank performance? Evidence obtained by applying several new measures of performance

2019 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. 471-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph P. Hughes ◽  
Julapa Jagtiani ◽  
Loretta J. Mester ◽  
Choon-Geol Moon
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 752-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory J McKee ◽  
Albert Kagan

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to assess product and service arrays of community banks within competitive markets that are impacted by varying sized financial institutions. A cost efficiency model is used to understand the relationship of product offerings and business cycle response upon bank performance. Design/methodology/approach – A cost efficiency model is used to understand the relationship of product offerings and business cycle response upon bank performance. Markets comprised of alternate size and type of financial institutions are compared. Findings – Greater values of X_EFF i when institutions compete are observed in this analysis. Cost efficiency is lowest when community banks are the only institution in the market, and second lowest when credit unions are the only competing institutions. Call report data are analyzed from 1994 to 2013. The number of big banks increases community bank efficiency and efficiency of large banks. Also, the number of community banks does affect big bank cost efficiency. The magnitude of the effect pertaining to the number of community banks upon big bank efficiency is much smaller than that of the number of big banks on community bank efficiency. Originality/value – This study considers cost efficiency and profitability as measures of institution on the performance of a competing institutional type. The modeling approach uses cost efficiency as a method of observing the performance of financial institutions and an explanation of how firms persist, grow, and respond to changes in technology or regulation. The effects of the presence of each type of financial institution on the performance of another type are compared. Situations in which any number of one or more institutional types is present in a market are considered for analysis purposes.


Author(s):  
Mubaraq Sanni ◽  
Abdulai Agbaje Salami ◽  
Ahmad Bukola Uthman

AbstractThe failure of banks in Nigeria has hitherto become a recurring phenomenon. Worried by the syndrome, this paper examines the determinants of bank performance in Nigeria taking into cognizance the duality of financial measures of bank performance. From an analysis of 115 bank-year observations of a sample of 17 Nigerian deposit money banks and macroeconomic data for the period 2012-2018 using Arellano-Bover one-step system GMM estimation approach, differences in the explanatory potential of these factors between the models with risk-neutral and risk-adjusted measures of performance as dependent variables are empirically established. This suggests that there is a higher probability of investors, depositors and other stakeholders being indecisive when analyzing the performance of banks. However, relying on the assumptions of risk-return hypothesis and level of risk embedded in banks’ operations could warrant them opting for determinants of risk-adjusted returns in their decision making. This study is exceptional in the bank performance literature for its long list of measures and drivers of bank performance.


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 418-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ram N. Acharya ◽  
Albert Kagan ◽  
Srinivasa Rao Lingam

2011 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saadet Kasman ◽  
Adnan Kasman

This paper investigates the link between stock performance of the listed commercial banks in the Turkish stock exchange and three measures of bank performance, such as technical efficiency, scale efficiency and productivity for the period 1998-2008. The relationship between efficiency and stock returns is investigated by running a regression of stock returns on measures of performance and some bank specific variables. The results indicate that the changes in three measures of performance have positive and significant effect on stock returns, suggesting that stocks of technical efficient, scale efficient and productive banks tend to outperform their inefficient and unproductive rivals.


2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert E. DePrince ◽  
William F. Ford ◽  
Pamela D. Morris

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean F. Amel ◽  
Robin A. Prager

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (26) ◽  
pp. 1-35
Author(s):  
Dean F. Amel ◽  
◽  
Robin A. Prager

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document