scholarly journals Municipal climate mitigation policy and policy learning - A review

2021 ◽  
pp. 128348
Author(s):  
Lena Neij ◽  
Eva Heiskanen
Nature Energy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Poblete-Cazenave ◽  
Shonali Pachauri ◽  
Edward Byers ◽  
Alessio Mastrucci ◽  
Bas van Ruijven

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (18) ◽  
pp. 6844-6858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan P. Gillett ◽  
Vivek K. Arora ◽  
Damon Matthews ◽  
Myles R. Allen

Abstract The ratio of warming to cumulative emissions of carbon dioxide has been shown to be approximately independent of time and emissions scenarios and directly relates emissions to temperature. It is therefore a potentially important tool for climate mitigation policy. The transient climate response to cumulative carbon emissions (TCRE), defined as the ratio of global-mean warming to cumulative emissions at CO2 doubling in a 1% yr−1 CO2 increase experiment, ranges from 0.8 to 2.4 K EgC−1 in 15 models from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5)—a somewhat broader range than that found in a previous generation of carbon–climate models. Using newly available simulations and a new observational temperature dataset to 2010, TCRE is estimated from observations by dividing an observationally constrained estimate of CO2-attributable warming by an estimate of cumulative carbon emissions to date, yielding an observationally constrained 5%–95% range of 0.7–2.0 K EgC−1.


Author(s):  
Paul Tobin ◽  
Louise Wylie

Despite a reputation for climate policy leadership, European states vary markedly in their responses to climate change. During the 2010s, a “conglomerate of crises” afflicted Europe, stymying climate ambitions to varying degrees. Yet climate change had ascended European political agendas by the decade’s close, championed by new social movements and voices and mirrored by innovative policy approaches, such as “Climate Emergency” declarations. In turn, this peak of engagement was followed by the COVID-19 pandemic. In such a tumultuous setting, the literature on comparative European environmental politics faces a complexity crisis as it seeks to map multiple axes of ambition across multiple levels. In this chapter, the authors problematize the identification of leaders and laggards within climate mitigation studies, as well as identify the challenges inherent to comparing state performance. They also examine recent policy and research trends, analyze the importance of policy resilience during crises, and emphasize the utility of multilevel understanding in national climate analysis.


2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaibhav Chaturvedi ◽  
Mohamad Hejazi ◽  
James Edmonds ◽  
Leon Clarke ◽  
Page Kyle ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 903-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph E Aldy ◽  
Alan J Krupnick ◽  
Richard G Newell ◽  
Ian W. H Parry ◽  
William A Pizer

This paper provides (for the nonspecialist) a highly streamlined discussion of the main issues, and controversies, in the design of climate mitigation policy. The first part of the paper discusses how much action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions at the global level is efficient under both the cost-effectiveness and welfare-maximizing paradigms. We then discuss various issues in the implementation of domestic emissions control policy, instrument choice, and incentives for technological innovation. Finally, we discuss alternative policy architectures at the international level. (JEL Q54, Q58)


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 061001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Mundaca ◽  
Jonas Sonnenschein ◽  
Linda Steg ◽  
Niklas Höhne ◽  
Diana Ürge-Vorsatz

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Lindroth ◽  
Lars Tranvik

AbstractThe Paris agreement identifies the importance of the conservation, or better, increase of the land carbon sink. In this respect, the mitigation policies of many forest rich countries rely heavily on products from forests as well as on the land sink. Here we demonstrate that Sweden’s land sink, which is critical in order to achieve zero net emissions by 2045 and negative emissions thereafter, is reduced to less than half when accounting for emissions from wetlands, lakes and running waters. This should have implications for the development of Sweden’s mitigation policy. National as well as the emerging global inventory of sources and sinks need to consider the entire territory to allow accurate guidance of future mitigation of climate change.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document