Decision-making behavior of rural residents’ domestic waste classification in Northwestern of China ——analysis based on environmental responsibility and pollution perception

2021 ◽  
Vol 326 ◽  
pp. 129374
Author(s):  
Yajuan Jia ◽  
Shujun Cheng ◽  
Rui Shi
2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorien Veldwijk ◽  
Brigitte A.B. Essers ◽  
Mattijs S. Lambooij ◽  
Carmen D. Dirksen ◽  
Henriette A. Smit ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan A. Sugam ◽  
Jeremy J. Day ◽  
R. Mark Wightman ◽  
Regina M. Carelli

1981 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerel A. Rosati

The bureaucratic politics model has achieved great popularity in the study of decision making. Yet too often the term “bureaucratic politics” is used by scholars and practitioners without clearly stating its policy application. The decision-making behavior that occurred during the Johnson and Nixon administrations for SALT I serves to illustrate many of the limits of the model. First, the decision-making structure posited by the bureaucratic politics model is not nearly as prevalent within the executive branch as is commonly assumed. Second, even where the bureaucratic politics structure is present, the decision-making process is not always one of bargaining, compromise, and consensus. Finally, the decision context and the decision participants are ignored in the model. To provide a clearer understanding of policy-making behavior, a more systematic decision-making framework is offered, which should contribute to the development of better model- and theory-building.


2013 ◽  
Vol 96 (7) ◽  
pp. 4751-4758 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.A. Russell ◽  
J.M. Bewley

2019 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. 224-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Meng ◽  
Xianchun Tan ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
Zongguo Wen ◽  
Yuan Tao ◽  
...  

1964 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Antoinette Ryan ◽  
John D. Krumboltz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document