scholarly journals Characterization of Kentucky dairy producer decision-making behavior

2013 ◽  
Vol 96 (7) ◽  
pp. 4751-4758 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.A. Russell ◽  
J.M. Bewley
Author(s):  
Barbara J. Barnett

This symposium addresses the characterization of human decision making within a complex environment for the purpose of developing improved decision support systems. All of the work presented in this symposium was conducted under a Navy research program entitled “Tactical Decision Making Under Stress” (TADMUS). The overall objective of the TADMUS program is to improve tactical decision making of anti-air warfare (AAW) crew members within the Aegis cruiser's combat information center (CIC) under conditions of stress and uncertainty. The unique aspect of this effort is that each presentation addresses decision making behavior, within a single domain, from a different perspective. The goal of each effort is to characterize some aspect of expert decision making performance within the AAW task environment, and to make recommendations for the resulting decision support system design based upon these characterizations. The result is a multi-faceted, human-centered approach to information organization and interface display design for a decision support system.


Author(s):  
Azadeh Assadi ◽  
Peter C. Laussen ◽  
Patricia Trbovich

Background and aims: Children with congenital heart disease (CHD) are at risk of deterioration in the face of common childhood illnesses, and their resuscitation and acute management is often best achieved with the guidance of CHD experts. Access to such expertise may be limited outside specialty heart centers and the fragility of these patients is cause for discomfort among many emergency medicine physicians. An understanding of the differences in macrocognition of these clinicians could shed light on some of the causes of discomfort and facilitate the development of a sociotechnological solution to this problem. Methods: Cardiac intensivists (CHD experts) and pediatric emergency medicine physicians (non-CHD experts) in a major academic cardiac center were interviewed using the critical decision method. Interview transcripts were coded deductively based on Klein’s macrocognitive framework and inductively to allow for new or modified characterization of dimensions. Results: While both CHD-experts and non-CHD experts relied on the macrocognitive functions of sensemaking, naturalistic decision making and detecting problems, the specific data and mental models used to understand the patients and course of therapy differed between CHD-experts and non-CHD experts. Conclusion: Characterization of differences between the macrocognitive processes of CHD experts and non-CHD experts can inform development of sociotechnological solutions to augment decision making pertaining to the acute management of pediatric CHD patients.


2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorien Veldwijk ◽  
Brigitte A.B. Essers ◽  
Mattijs S. Lambooij ◽  
Carmen D. Dirksen ◽  
Henriette A. Smit ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan A. Sugam ◽  
Jeremy J. Day ◽  
R. Mark Wightman ◽  
Regina M. Carelli

1981 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerel A. Rosati

The bureaucratic politics model has achieved great popularity in the study of decision making. Yet too often the term “bureaucratic politics” is used by scholars and practitioners without clearly stating its policy application. The decision-making behavior that occurred during the Johnson and Nixon administrations for SALT I serves to illustrate many of the limits of the model. First, the decision-making structure posited by the bureaucratic politics model is not nearly as prevalent within the executive branch as is commonly assumed. Second, even where the bureaucratic politics structure is present, the decision-making process is not always one of bargaining, compromise, and consensus. Finally, the decision context and the decision participants are ignored in the model. To provide a clearer understanding of policy-making behavior, a more systematic decision-making framework is offered, which should contribute to the development of better model- and theory-building.


1964 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Antoinette Ryan ◽  
John D. Krumboltz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document