Dose Comparison of Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid to Reduce Blood Loss in Infants Undergoing Cranial Vault Reconstruction Surgery: A Retrospective Pilot Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. 109952
Author(s):  
Pranati Pillutla ◽  
Audrey Le ◽  
Mark E. Thompson ◽  
Phillip Watkins ◽  
Laszlo Nagy ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliann C. Hobbs ◽  
Ian J. Welsby ◽  
Cynthia L. Green ◽  
Ishwori B. Dhakal ◽  
Samuel S. Wellman

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 304-305
Author(s):  
P. A. Stricker ◽  
A. F. Zuppa ◽  
J. E. Fiadjoe ◽  
L. G. Maxwell ◽  
E. M. Sussman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Alexandra Borst ◽  
Christopher Bonfield ◽  
Poornachanda Deenadayalan ◽  
Chi Le ◽  
Meng Xu ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION: Children undergoing complex cranial vault reconstruction (CCVR) for craniosynostosis experience high rates of bleeding and transfusion, increasing risk for perioperative complications. ε-Aminocaproic acid (EACA) and tranexamic acid (TXA) are antifibrinolytic agents that have been shown to reduce intraoperative hemorrhage and transfusion requirements during CCVR. However, the relative efficacy of these two agents has not yet been evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative blood loss and transfusion rates in children receiving EACA vs. TXA. METHODS: All patients who underwent CCVR from September 2015 to December 2019 at a single center were retrospectively evaluated. Primary outcome measures included intraoperative estimated blood loss, postoperative drain output, transfusion volumes, and calculated blood loss. Secondary outcome measures included hematologic and coagulation parameters. RESULTS: 95 patients were included, with 47 patients in the EACA cohort and 48 patients in the TXA cohort. There were no significant differences in demographics, surgical outcomes, blood loss, transfusion requirement, or perioperative hematologic and coagulation laboratory values between the two cohorts. Adverse events were similar between the groups, but did include two seizure events and two thromboembolic events related to vascular access devices. DISCUSSION: We found no significant difference in blood loss, transfusion requirements, hematologic parameters, or outcomes between pediatric CCVR patients who received EACA vs. TXA. Further research is needed to define optimal antifibrinolytic dosing and duration of therapy. While standard laboratory parameters were similar between groups, future studies investigating coagulation-based and inflammatory assays may be useful in defining surgical-induced coagulopathy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirbhay Parashar ◽  
Tarek Nafee ◽  
Cheryl Lefaiver ◽  
Christine Steffensen ◽  
Vince Rizzo ◽  
...  

Background: Antifibrinolytic agents are frequently used during pediatric heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to reduce transfusions. There are no studies comparing anti-inflammatory effects of antifibrinolytic agents, tranexamic acid (TXA) and Epsilon Aminocaproic acid (EACA). We compared the two agents in pediatric patients undergoing redo sternotomy with CPB. Aim: To compare anti-inflammatory effects of tranexamic acid versus aminocaproic acid in pediatric patients undergoing redo sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double blind pilot study, comparing 10 subjects in each group receiving EACA and TXA. A cytokine panel was used to measure 13 inflammatory markers in pre, immediate post and 24 hours post-CPB period. Between group comparisons were tested with Mann-Whitney U tests and within group comparisons with Friedman tests. Results: Sample characteristics were comparable in both groups. Post CPB, plasma levels of 7 markers increased significantly (p<0.05) in both groups, including MCP-1; 3 increased significantly (p<0.03) in the EACA group alone, including GM-CSF; and 3 did not change over time (Table 1). No difference was found between groups for markers except for IL-10, which was significantly higher in EACA group post CPB. While absolute values of markers, chest tube output and volume of blood product needs were lower in TXA group, the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in anti-inflammatory profiles between EACA and TXA in this pilot study. GM-CSF and MCP-1 were increased in our study post CBP which has not been described in previous studies.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1527-1531 ◽  
Author(s):  
David T. Martin ◽  
Heike Gries ◽  
Nick Esmonde ◽  
Brian Diggs ◽  
Jeffrey Koh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document