Three years of the nationwide post-acute stroke care program in Taiwan

Abstract Background Following the publication of the National Stroke Audit in 2015 with below the national average rates of thrombolysis – 3.3% versus 11% - there has been a number of initiatives launched to improve stroke care in this hospital. In 2018 we enrolled in the National Quality Improvement Project for the care of Patients with Acute Ischaemic Stroke run by the RCSI. A stroke steering committee was established consisting of a multi-disciplinary group encompassing all areas of acute stroke care. Methods Acute stroke care practice and factors causing sub-optimal management were examined by the committee and compared with national standards. A ‘3 jobs’ proforma for management and communication of Fast positive cases was designed to address the difficulties identified in stroke care and tailored to the resources available in this hospital. These simplified and standardised roles for all staff members involved, many of whom were unfamiliar with the practical delivery of thrombolysis and thrombectomy. Educational sessions were initiated for all those involved in acute stroke management. The acute stroke program was implemented as a 6 month pilot before official launch in April 2019 with necessary changes assessed weekly by the stroke committee. Stroke data is continually audited with the National Stroke Register. Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) in the pilot were thrombolysis/thrombectomy rates and door to needle time. Results There were 164 patients admitted to the stroke unit in 2018. In 2018 prior to this initiative, the hospital had a 3% thrombolysis rate in 2018 and a 1% thrombectomy rate. Amongst FAST positive patients during the pilot period, 10/68 patients were thombolysed (15%) and 6/68 thrombectomies (9%). Average door to needle time for patients was 96 minutes. Conclusion The redesigning of the acute stroke care program has led to significant improvements in the identified KPI’s although door to needle times remain below the national target of 30 minutes.

Download Full-text

Stroke Unit Development and Working Dynamics - Acute Stroke Care Program

Academic Emergency Medicine ◽

10.1197/j.aem.2006.10.010 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 14 (4) ◽

pp. e76-e77

Author(s):

J. Awruch ◽

R. Valentini ◽

L. Lemme-Pleghos ◽

G. Janello ◽

I. Bonelli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Unit ◽

Care Program ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care

Download Full-text

Relevance of Stroke Code, Stroke Unit and Stroke Networks in Organization of Acute Stroke Care – The Madrid Acute Stroke Care Program

Cerebrovascular Diseases ◽

10.1159/000200452 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (1) ◽

pp. 140-147 ◽

Cited By ~ 40

Author(s):

María Alonso de Leciñana-Cases ◽

Antonio Gil-Núñez ◽

Exuperio Díez-Tejedor

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Unit ◽

Care Program ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care

Download Full-text

Berlin PRehospital Or Usual Delivery of Acute Stroke Care 2.0 (B_PROUD 2.0)

Case Medical Research ◽

10.31525/ct1-nct03931616 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care

Download Full-text

Essential Acute Stroke Care in Low Resource Settings: a Pilot studY

Case Medical Research ◽

10.31525/ct1-nct04157231 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Keyword(s):

Pilot Study ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Low Resource Settings ◽

Low Resource

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Provision of acute stroke care and associated factors in a multiethnic population: prospective study with the South London Stroke Register.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.8785964.9312066 ◽

2011 ◽

Author(s):

Erik Buskens

Keyword(s):

Prospective Study ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Associated Factors ◽

Stroke Care ◽

The South ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Multiethnic Population ◽

Stroke Register

Download Full-text

Bottlenecks in the Acute Stroke Care System during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Catalonia

Cerebrovascular Diseases ◽

10.1159/000516309 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Anna Ramos-Pachón ◽

Álvaro García-Tornel ◽

Mònica Millán ◽

Marc Ribó ◽

Sergi Amaro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Functional Outcome ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Care Quality ◽

Point Of View ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Prehospital Delays ◽

The Impact

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant healthcare reorganizations, potentially striking standard medical care. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke care quality and clinical outcomes to detect healthcare system’s bottlenecks from a territorial point of view. Methods: Crossed-data analysis between a prospective nation-based mandatory registry of acute stroke, Emergency Medical System (EMS) records, and daily incidence of COVID-19 in Catalonia (Spain). We included all stroke code activations during the pandemic (March 15–May 2, 2020) and an immediate prepandemic period (January 26–March 14, 2020). Primary outcomes were stroke code activations and reperfusion therapies in both periods. Secondary outcomes included clinical characteristics, workflow metrics, differences across types of stroke centers, correlation analysis between weekly EMS alerts, COVID-19 cases, and workflow metrics, and impact on mortality and clinical outcome at 90 days. Results: Stroke code activations decreased by 22% and reperfusion therapies dropped by 29% during the pandemic period, with no differences in age, stroke severity, or large vessel occlusion. Calls to EMS were handled 42 min later, and time from onset to hospital arrival increased by 53 min, with significant correlations between weekly COVID-19 cases and more EMS calls (rho = 0.81), less stroke code activations (rho = −0.37), and longer prehospital delays (rho = 0.25). Telestroke centers were afflicted with higher reductions in stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, referrals to endovascular centers, and increased delays to thrombolytics. The independent odds of death increased (OR 1.6 [1.05–2.4], p 0.03) and good functional outcome decreased (mRS ≤2 at 90 days: OR 0.6 [0.4–0.9], p 0.015) during the pandemic period. Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Catalonia’s stroke system’s weakest points were the delay to EMS alert and a decline of stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, and interhospital transfers, mostly at local centers. Patients suffering an acute stroke during the pandemic period had higher odds of poor functional outcome and death. The complete stroke care system’s analysis is crucial to allocate resources appropriately.

Download Full-text

Acute Stroke Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Reduction in the Number of Admissions of Elderly Patients and Increase in Prehospital Delays

Cerebrovascular Diseases ◽

10.1159/000514140 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Gabriel Velilla-Alonso ◽

Andrés García-Pastor ◽

Ángela Rodríguez-López ◽

Ana Gómez-Roldós ◽

Antonio Sánchez-Soblechero ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Elderly Patients ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Time Course ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Group Data ◽

Radiological Data ◽

History Of ◽

Prehospital Delays

Introduction: We analyzed whether the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis affected acute stroke care in our center during the first 2 months of lockdown in Spain. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study. We collected demographic, clinical, and radiological data; time course; and treatment of patients meeting the stroke unit admission criteria from March 14 to May 14, 2020 (COVID-19 period group). Data were compared with the same period in 2019 (pre-COVID-19 period group). Results: 195 patients were analyzed; 83 in the COVID-19 period group, resulting in a 26% decline of acute strokes and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) admitted to our center compared with the previous year (p = 0.038). Ten patients (12%) tested positive for PCR SARS-CoV-2. The proportion of patients aged 65 years and over was lower in the COVID-19 period group (53 vs. 68.8%, p = 0.025). During the pandemic period, analyzed patients were more frequently smokers (27.7 vs. 10.7%, p = 0.002) and had less frequently history of prior stroke (13.3 vs. 25%, p = 0.043) or atrial fibrillation (9.6 vs. 25%, p = 0.006). ASPECTS score was lower (9 [7–10] vs. 10 [8–10], p = 0.032), NIHSS score was slightly higher (5 [2–14] vs. 4 [2–8], p = 0.122), onset-to-door time was higher (304 [93–760] vs. 197 [91.25–645] min, p = 0.104), and a lower proportion arrived within 4.5 h from onset of symptoms (43.4 vs. 58%, p = 0.043) during the COVID-19 period. There were no differences between proportion of patients receiving recanalization treatment (intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy) and in-hospital delays. Conclusion: We observed a reduction in the number of acute strokes and TIAs admitted during the COVID-19 period. This drop affected especially elderly patients, and despite a delay in their arrival to the emergency department, the proportion of patients treated with recanalization therapies was preserved.

Download Full-text