Material Flow Analysis (MFA) and waste characterizations for formal and informal performance indicators in Tandil, Argentina: Decision-making implications

2020 ◽  
Vol 264 ◽  
pp. 110453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano Villalba
2011 ◽  
Vol 63 (11) ◽  
pp. 2498-2504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydie Yiougo ◽  
Halidou Koanda ◽  
Christoph Luethi ◽  
Joseph Wéthé

In the context of rapid urbanization across Sub-Saharan Africa there is a critical need for more robust decision-making between different ways of providing sanitation services in existing and new peri-urban areas. In several countries, authorities tried to find solutions by developing strategies to address sanitation problems in the form of Strategic Sanitation Plans. In Burkina, Strategic Sanitation Plans have been elaborated and implemented since the 1990s. Fada N'Gourma, a secondary city in Burkina, also adopted a Strategic Plan for wastewater and excreta management in 2006. In this study we use material flow analysis as a decision making tool to verify technology options of the Plan. A model was developed and data was collected in order to assess material and nitrogen flows. The status quo situation was compared to scenario based on the proposals made in the Sanitation Plan. Results show that the technology options which were recommended improved human health in the short term. However, the options led to groundwater pollution in the medium term. Compared to the current situation, matter and nitrogen flows would increase by 7% and 7.4% respectively in groundwater. It is thus concluded that the proposed options will not achieve the Plan's stated objectives of environmental protection.


2002 ◽  
Vol 153 (3) ◽  
pp. 97-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Werner ◽  
Hans-Jörg Althaus ◽  
Klaus Richter

Environmental decision-support tools, such as life cycle assessment or material flow analysis, only support the decision-making process if, in addition to the causalities of the systems under study, their role within sustainable development is adequately depicted. This article outlines the basis of the two requirements for post-consumer wood in Switzerland.


2000 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn Hendriks ◽  
Richard Obernosterer ◽  
Daniel Müller ◽  
Susanne Kytzia ◽  
Peter Baccini ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 7939
Author(s):  
Sohani Vihanga Withanage ◽  
Komal Habib

The unprecedented technological development and economic growth over the past two decades has resulted in streams of rapidly growing electronic waste (e-waste) around the world. As the potential source of secondary raw materials including precious and critical materials, e-waste has recently gained significant attention across the board, ranging from governments and industry, to academia and civil society organizations. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the last decade of e-waste literature followed by an in-depth analysis of the application of material flow analysis (MFA) and life cycle assessment (LCA), i.e., two less commonly used strategic tools to guide the relevant stakeholders in efficient management of e-waste. Through a keyword search on two main online search databases, Scopus and Web of Science, 1835 peer-reviewed publications were selected and subjected to a bibliographic network analysis to identify and visualize major research themes across the selected literature. The selected 1835 studies were classified into ten different categories based on research area, such as environmental and human health impacts, recycling and recovery technologies, associated social aspects, etc. With this selected literature in mind, the review process revealed the two least explored research areas over the past decade: MFA and LCA with 33 and 31 studies, respectively. A further in-depth analysis was conducted for these two areas regarding their application to various systems with numerous scopes and different stages of e-waste life cycle. The study provides a detailed discussion regarding their applicability, and highlights challenges and opportunities for further research.


2021 ◽  
Vol 173 ◽  
pp. 105732
Author(s):  
Xue Rui ◽  
Yong Geng ◽  
Xin Sun ◽  
Han Hao ◽  
Shijiang Xiao

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document