Carbon mitigation by quota allocation

2022 ◽  
Vol 304 ◽  
pp. 114097
Author(s):  
Tahereh Shojaei ◽  
Alireza Mokhtar
Energies ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 2256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Meng ◽  
Lixue Wang ◽  
Qu Chen

As an essential measure to mitigate the CO2 emissions, China is constructing a nationwide carbon emission trading (CET) market. The electric power industry is the first sector that will be introduced into this market, but the quota allocation scheme, as the key foundation of market transactions, is still undetermined. This research employed the gross domestic product (GDP), energy consumption, and electric generation data of 30 provinces from 2001 to 2015, a hybrid trend forecasting model, and a three-indicator allocation model to measure the provincial quota allocation for carbon emissions in China′s electric power sector. The conclusions drawn from the empirical analysis can be summarized as follows: (1) The carbon emission peak in China′s electric power sector will appear in 2027, and peak emissions will be 3.63 billion tons, which will surpass the total carbon emissions of the European Union (EU) and approximately equal to 2/3 of the United States of America (USA). (2) The developed provinces that are supported by traditional industries should take more responsibility for carbon mitigation. (3) Nine provinces are expected to be the buyers in the CET market. These provinces are mostly located in eastern China, and account for approximately 63.65% of China′s carbon emissions generated by the electric power sector. (4) The long-distance electric power transmission shifts the carbon emissions and then has an impact on the quotas allocation for carbon emissions. (5) The development and effective utilization of clean power generation will play a positive role for carbon mitigation in China′s electric sector.


1998 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce R. Hirsh

The Bananas decision demonstrated that WTO dispute settlement panels and the Appellate Body are capable of effectively and clearly analyzing whether extremely complex measures are consistent with WTO rules. The trade-liberalizing decision established the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) as a meaningful constraint on discriminatory measures with an impact on both goods and services and clarified the nature of the GATS Most-Favoured Nation (MFN) obligation. The decision also severely constrained the ability of the EU to justify non-tariff discriminatory measures such as the quota allocation system at issue in Bananas based on the Lomé waiver.


2021 ◽  
pp. 101686
Author(s):  
Andres Seidel ◽  
Nadine May ◽  
Edeltraud Guenther ◽  
Frank Ellinger

Author(s):  
Kanwalroop K. Dhanda ◽  
Joseph Sarkis ◽  
Dileep G. Dhavale

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 303-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catriona A Macdonald ◽  
Ian C Anderson ◽  
Richard D Bardgett ◽  
Brajesh K Singh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document