Meta-analysis of consumer's willingness-to-pay premiums for certified wood products

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Cai ◽  
Francisco X. Aguilar
1999 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard P. Vlosky ◽  
Lucie K. Ozanne ◽  
Renée J. Fontenot

2004 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 617-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly L. Jensen ◽  
Paul M. Jakus ◽  
Burton C. English ◽  
Jamey Menard

We use Kriström's simple spike model to assess the factors influencing consumers' willingness to pay a premium for a variety of certified wood products. A survey of over 1,600 Pennsylvania and Tennessee residents found that approximately 35% were willing to pay some positive “premium” for environmentally certified wood products. For three types of wood products (a $28.80 shelf, a $199 chair, and a $799 table), we find the estimated market premiums to be $3.74, $15.94, and $45.07, respectively.


Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 2677
Author(s):  
Anastasios Bastounis ◽  
John Buckell ◽  
Jamie Hartmann-Boyce ◽  
Brian Cook ◽  
Sarah King ◽  
...  

Food production is a major contributor to environmental damage. More environmentally sustainable foods could incur higher costs for consumers. In this review, we explore whether consumers are willing to pay (WTP) more for foods with environmental sustainability labels (‘ecolabels’). Six electronic databases were searched for experiments on consumers’ willingness to pay for ecolabelled food. Monetary values were converted to Purchasing Power Parity dollars and adjusted for country-specific inflation. Studies were meta-analysed and effect sizes with confidence intervals were calculated for the whole sample and for pre-specified subgroups defined as meat-dairy, seafood, and fruits-vegetables-nuts. Meta-regressions tested the role of label attributes and demographic characteristics on participants’ WTP. Forty-three discrete choice experiments (DCEs) with 41,777 participants were eligible for inclusion. Thirty-five DCEs (n = 35,725) had usable data for the meta-analysis. Participants were willing to pay a premium of 3.79 PPP$/kg (95%CI 2.7, 4.89, p ≤ 0.001) for ecolabelled foods. WTP was higher for organic labels compared to other labels. Women and people with lower levels of education expressed higher WTP. Ecolabels may increase consumers’ willingness to pay more for environmentally sustainable products and could be part of a strategy to encourage a transition to more sustainable diets.


2022 ◽  
Vol 136 ◽  
pp. 102670
Author(s):  
Teresa Panico ◽  
Francesco Caracciolo ◽  
Marilena Furno

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document