A data model for clinical legal medicine practice and the development of a dedicated software for both practitioners and researchers

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 12-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Dang ◽  
Thomas Phuong ◽  
Mahmoud Beddag ◽  
Anabel Vega ◽  
Céline Denis
2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (Special Issue) ◽  
pp. 54-55
Author(s):  
George Cristian Curca ◽  
◽  
Iuliana Diac ◽  
Violeta Ionela Chirica ◽  
Filip Virgil Perde ◽  
...  

"Introduction. In Romania legal medicine suppose professional activities as forensic pathologist and legal doctor are facing victims that request documenting traumatic lesions if any or sexual abuses, prejudices, working capacity, malpraxis, etc. Objective. The objective of our work is to determine the special kind of doctor-patient relationship in clinical legal medicine and to analyze the ethical influences. Material and methods. More than 1500 cases of medico-legal examinations are performed in the National Institute of Legal Medicine Mina Minovici in Bucharest each year. Most of them are domestic violence requests or car accidents. Discussions. In the late 30 years (Ezechiel JE, Linda LE, JAMA 1992) found out 4 different relationship models that may be applied in medical practice; the paternalistic model (the patient accepts his doctor as his legal and moral representative), informative model (the patient expresses his autonomy), interpretative model (the doctor is a good friend in need) and the deliberative model of self-construction of the knowledge that the patient must have in order to have a voluntary decision. Conclusions. In clinical legal medicine the patient is not only a patient but a victim also. Therefore, the relationship is double folded. With his patient the legal doctor develops initially an informative model, then an interpretative model. With his victim the doctor develops initially a paternalistic approach (passive character type) or an informative one (active character type), usually an interpretative model as most highly requested (What would you do if you were I?) or the deliberative model when evaluating prejudices, etc. "


2017 ◽  
pp. 216-233
Author(s):  
Mete K. Gülmen ◽  
Nebile Daglioglu ◽  
Ayse Serin ◽  
Dilek Battal

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. A257-A257
Author(s):  
N. Gage-Lindner ◽  
A. Heinemann ◽  
D. Seifert ◽  
J. Siemer ◽  
K. Pschel

Author(s):  
G. Brahy ◽  
B. Eugene-Dahin ◽  
J. Ravache-Quiriny ◽  
Ph. Boxho

1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-275
Author(s):  
O. Lawrence ◽  
J.D. Gostin

In the summer of 1979, a group of experts on law, medicine, and ethics assembled in Siracusa, Sicily, under the auspices of the International Commission of Jurists and the International Institute of Higher Studies in Criminal Science, to draft guidelines on the rights of persons with mental illness. Sitting across the table from me was a quiet, proud man of distinctive intelligence, William J. Curran, Frances Glessner Lee Professor of Legal Medicine at Harvard University. Professor Curran was one of the principal drafters of those guidelines. Many years later in 1991, after several subsequent re-drafts by United Nations (U.N.) Rapporteur Erica-Irene Daes, the text was adopted by the U.N. General Assembly as the Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and for the Improvement of Mental Health Care. This was the kind of remarkable achievement in the field of law and medicine that Professor Curran repeated throughout his distinguished career.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro J. M. Passos ◽  
Duarte Araujo ◽  
Keith Davids ◽  
Ana Diniz ◽  
Luis Gouveia ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document