Expression of concern: “The risk-benefit assessment of liver biopsy in times of non-invasive screening for liver fibrosis” by Ivana Ilic and Tamara Milovanovic; Journal of Hepatology, 73 (2020) 701–702

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 55-59
Author(s):  
Andreea Rădășan ◽  
◽  
Mihai Voiculescu ◽  
Laura Elena Iliescu ◽  
◽  
...  

Introduction. In recent years there have been major advances in the treatment and prevention of viral hepatitis, but this pathology is still a major health and socio-economic problem. The defining element for this disease is the liver fibrosis, a histological component of particular importance due to its role in the formation of liver lesions of cirrhosis. Thus, an essential step in the management of chronic viral hepatitis is the detection and measurement of liver fibrosis. Today we have invasive methods for detecting liver fibrosis, the liver puncture biopsy, and non-invasive methods, which in turn are divided into serum methods and imaging methods (2). Purpose of the Study. The aim of this study is to determine if transcutaneous elastography (FibroScan) is equally reliable in case of viral hepatitis B, as with viral hepatitis C. Material and Method: The study comprises a total of 1,127 patients with liver disease of HBV and HCV aetiology. These patients were examined using FibroScan in the period July 2009 - April 2011. Results: Of the 1,177 patients investigated using FibroScan, 40 underwent liver biopsy as well. Of these, 82% have obtained same stages of liver fibrosis in these two investigations, and 18% achieved different stages of fibrosis in these two tests. For the patients with HCV infection, we obtained a 67.81% match of the two non-invasive tests, FibroScan and FibroMax, and a 79.16% match of FibroScan compared to the Liver Biopsy. For the B virus, the compliance is even better, of 75% (FibroScan - FibroMax), and 80% for FibroScan - LB. Conclusions: FibroScan is one of the non-invasive assessment methods of liver fibrosis with diagnose accuracy similar to FibroMax and close to Liver Biopsy.


Haemophilia ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. MAOR ◽  
D. BASHARI ◽  
G. KENET ◽  
A. LUBETSKY ◽  
J. LUBOSHITZ ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e0138838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Schmid ◽  
Andrea Bregenzer ◽  
Milo Huber ◽  
Andri Rauch ◽  
Wolfram Jochum ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 304-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Erfani Karimzadeh Toosi

AbstractHepatic fibrogenesis is the final result of injury to the liver. Fibrosis could lead to hepatic dysfunction, important in the pathogenesis of other chronic problems. Therefore, understanding the mechanism, accurate diagnosis and staging of it in early stages accelerates the treatment and reduces the prevalence of chirrosis. Treatment strategies of liver problems and detction methods depend on the amount and progression of liver fibrosis and the rate of cirrhosis development. Traditionally the invasive method, liver biopsy, is reference standard to follow progression and stage of fibrosis. However, during the past decade, progressive development of novel non-invasive methodologies has challenged the invasive method. Non-invasive methods have been initially introduced for chronic hepatitis C with increasing use in other chronic liver diseases. The need for liver biopsy has nowadays decreased significantly as a result of these methodologies. Most of the new non-invasive methods depend on either ‘biological’ or ‘physical’ approaches.In this review, starting from the mechanism of fibrogenesis, the current knowledge about diagnosis, treatment strategies and different methods for its evaluation is discussed. This is followed by a conclusion on what is expected to be known in this field during the future research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document