A Muskingum-based methodology for river discharge estimation and rating curve development under significant lateral inflow conditions

2017 ◽  
Vol 554 ◽  
pp. 216-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Barbetta ◽  
Tommaso Moramarco ◽  
Muthiah Perumal
2007 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muthiah Perumal ◽  
Tommaso Moramarco ◽  
Bhabagrahi Sahoo ◽  
Silvia Barbetta

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1851-1866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinh Thi Lan Anh ◽  
Filipe Aires

Abstract River discharge (RD) estimates are necessary for many applications, including water management, flood risk, and water cycle studies. Satellite-derived long-term GIEMS-D3 surface water extent (SWE) maps and HydroSHEDS data, at 90-m resolution, are here used to estimate several hydrological quantities at a monthly time scale over a few selected locations within the Amazon basin. Two methods are first presented to derive the water level (WL): the “hypsometric curve” and the “histogram cutoff” approaches at an 18 km × 18 km resolution. The obtained WL values are interpolated over the whole water mask using a bilinear interpolation. The two methods give similar results and validation with altimetry is satisfactory, with a correlation ranging from 0.72 to 0.89 in the seven considered stations over three rivers (i.e., Wingu, Negro, and Solimoes Rivers). River width (RW) and water volume change (WVC) are also estimated. WVC is evaluated with GRACE total water storage change, and correlations range from 0.77 to 0.88. A neural network (NN) statistical model is then used to estimate the RD based on four predictors (SWE, WL, WVC, and RW) and on in situ RD measurements. Results compare well to in situ measurements with a correlation of about 0.97 for the raw data (and 0.84 for the anomalies). The presented methodologies show the potential of historical satellite data (the combination of SWE with topography) to help estimate RD. Our study focuses here on a large river in the Amazon basin at a monthly scale; additional analyses would be required for other rivers, including smaller ones, in different environments, and at higher temporal scale.


Author(s):  
A. Tarpanelli ◽  
L. Brocca ◽  
S. Barbetta ◽  
T. Lacava ◽  
M. Faruolo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mulugeta Genanu Kebede ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Kun Yang ◽  
Deliang Chen ◽  
Xiuping Li ◽  
...  

Reliable information about river discharge plays a key role in sustainably managing water resources and better understanding of hydrological systems. Therefore, river discharge estimation using remote sensing techniques is an ongoing research goal, especially in small, headwater catchments which are mostly ungauged due to environmental or financial limitations. Here, a novel method for river discharge estimation based entirely on remote sensing-derived parameters is presented. The model inputs include average river width, estimated from Landsat imagery by using the modified normalized difference water index (MNDWI) approach; average depth and velocity, based on empirical equations with inputs from remote sensing; channel slope from a high resolution shuttle radar topography mission digital elevation model (SRTM DEM); and channel roughness coefficient via further analysis and classification of Landsat images with support of previously published values. The discharge of the Lhasa River was then estimated based on these derived parameters and by using either the Manning equation (Model 1) or Bjerklie equation (Model 2). In general, both of the two models tend to overestimate discharge at moderate and high flows, and underestimate discharge at low flows. The overall performances of both models at the Lhasa gauge were satisfactory: comparisons with the observations yielded Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) and R2 values ≥ 0.886. Both models also performed well at the upper gauge (Tanggya) of the Lhasa River (NSE ≥ 0.950) indicating the transferability of the methodology to river cross-sections with different morphologies, thus demonstrating the potential to quantify streamflow entirely from remote sensing data in poorly-gauged or ungauged rivers on the Tibetan Plateau.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. e0225758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan E. Jones ◽  
Amber K. Hardison ◽  
Ben R. Hodges ◽  
James W. McClelland ◽  
Kevan B. Moffett

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1093-1097 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Koussis

Abstract. The estimation of transient streamflow from stage measurements is indeed important and the study of Dottori, Martina and Todini (2009) (henceforth DMT) is useful, however, DMT seem to miss certain of its practical aspects. The goal is to infer the discharge from measurements of the stage conveniently and with accuracy adequate for practical work. This comment addresses issues of the applicability of the DMT method in the field. DMT also advocate their method as a replacement of the widely used Jones Formula. The Jones Formula was modified by Thomas (Henderson, 1966) to include the temporal derivative of the depth, instead of the spatial one, to specifically allow discharge estimation from at-a-section stage observations. The outcome of the comparison is not surprising in view of this approximation. However, this discussion intends to show that, properly evaluated, the praxis-oriented Jones Formula, which did well in the tests, can perform better than DMT imply. It will be also documented that the DMT methodology relates to a known method for computing flood depth profiles.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document