277 Platelet-rich plasma for treating female androgenic alopecia: A systematic review

The number of articles evaluating platelet-rich plasma (PRP) efficacy in androgenic alopecia (AGA) have exponentially increased during the last decade. A systematic review on this field was performed by assessing in the selected studies the local injections of PRP compared to any control for AGA. The protocol was developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting for Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. A multistep search of the PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, PreMEDLINE, Ebase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Clinicaltrials.gov, Scopus database, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify studies on hair loss treatment with platelet-rich plasma. Of the 163 articles initially identified, 123 articles focusing on AGA were selected and, consequently, only 12 clinical trials were analyzed. The studies included had to match predetermined criteria according to the PICOS (patients, intervention, comparator, outcomes, and study design) approach. In total, 84% of the studies reported a positive effect of PRP for AGA treatment. Among them, 50% of the studies demonstrated a statistically significant improvement using objective measures and 34% of the studies showed hair density and hair thickness improvement, although no p values or statistical analysis was described. In total, 17% of the studies reported greater improvement in lower-grade AGA, while 8% noted increased improvement in higher-grade AGA. Only 17% of the studies reported that PRP was not effective in treating AGA. The information analyzed highlights the positive effects of PRP on AGA, without major side effects and thus it be may considered as a safe and effective alternative procedure to treat hair loss compared with Minoxidil® and Finasteride®.

Download Full-text

Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Androgenic Alopecia: A Systematic Review

Facial Plastic Surgery ◽

10.1055/s-0038-1660845 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 34 (06) ◽

pp. 631-640 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Jenny Chen ◽

Natalie Justicz ◽

Linda Lee

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Platelet Rich Plasma ◽

Case Reports ◽

Androgenic Alopecia ◽

Delivery Methods ◽

Facial Plastic Surgery ◽

Clinical Criteria ◽

Facial Plastic ◽

Application Techniques ◽

Good Patient Satisfaction

AbstractThe use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has become increasingly commonplace in facial plastic surgery for the treatment of androgenic alopecia (AGA). However, this treatment remains novel with a range of application techniques and outcomes described in the literature. Herein, the authors systematically review the existing literature on the use and efficacy of PRP for AGA. Systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed. Case reports were excluded. Twenty-four papers met inclusion criteria for this study: 8 randomized control trials and 16 prospective cohort studies. Twenty-one studies used clinical criteria to diagnose AGA, while three used confirmatory biopsies. PRP was injected with or without the use of a numbing agent, and most studies performed multiple injections (three or more separated by several weeks). Twenty-one studies reported positive outcomes by objective criteria (88%), while three suggested that there was no clinical improvement, although in two of these studies patients still reported increased satisfaction. There were no complications reported other than transient edema/erythema and pain/headache associated with the procedure. The existing literature suggests that PRP is a low-risk intervention to treat AGA associated with good patient satisfaction and objective improvements in outcomes. Further research is needed to optimize preparation and delivery methods as well as standardize measurements of clinical outcomes.

Download Full-text

Injections of platelet-rich plasma for androgenic alopecia: A systematic review

Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ◽

10.1016/j.jormas.2017.06.011 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 118 (5) ◽

pp. 291-297 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

F. Picard ◽

B. Hersant ◽

J. Niddam ◽

J.-P. Meningaud

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Platelet Rich Plasma ◽

Androgenic Alopecia

Download Full-text

Transplantation of Adipose-derived Cells for Periodontal Regeneration: A Systematic Review

Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy ◽

10.2174/1574888x13666181105144430 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 14 (6) ◽

pp. 504-518 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Dilcele Silva Moreira Dziedzic ◽

Bassam Felipe Mogharbel ◽

Priscila Elias Ferreira ◽

Ana Carolina Irioda ◽

Katherine Athayde Teixeira de Carvalho

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Animal Models ◽

Platelet Rich Plasma ◽

Periodontal Regeneration ◽

In Vitro Studies ◽

In Vivo Studies ◽

Cell Sources ◽

Study Designs

This systematic review evaluated the transplantation of cells derived from adipose tissue for applications in dentistry. SCOPUS, PUBMED and LILACS databases were searched for in vitro studies and pre-clinical animal model studies using the keywords “ADIPOSE”, “CELLS”, and “PERIODONTAL”, with the Boolean operator “AND”. A total of 160 titles and abstracts were identified, and 29 publications met the inclusion criteria, 14 in vitro and 15 in vivo studies. In vitro studies demonstrated that adipose- derived cells stimulate neovascularization, have osteogenic and odontogenic potential; besides adhesion, proliferation and differentiation on probable cell carriers. Preclinical studies described improvement of bone and periodontal healing with the association of adipose-derived cells and the carrier materials tested: Platelet Rich Plasma, Fibrin, Collagen and Synthetic polymer. There is evidence from the current in vitro and in vivo data indicating that adipose-derived cells may contribute to bone and periodontal regeneration. The small quantity of studies and the large variation on study designs, from animal models, cell sources and defect morphology, did not favor a meta-analysis. Additional studies need to be conducted to investigate the regeneration variability and the mechanisms of cell participation in the processes. An overview of animal models, cell sources, and scaffolds, as well as new perspectives are provided for future bone and periodontal regeneration study designs.

Download Full-text

Platelet-rich plasma in non-operative management of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome – A systematic review & meta-analysis of short-term outcomes

Journal of Orthopaedics ◽

10.1016/j.jor.2021.05.004 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Martin S. Davey ◽

Matthew G. Davey ◽

Eoghan T. Hurley ◽

J. Tristan Cassidy ◽

Hannan Mullett ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽

Carpal Tunnel ◽

Platelet Rich Plasma ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Operative Management ◽

Short Term ◽

Tunnel Syndrome ◽

Non Operative Management

Download Full-text

Treating Knee Osteoarthritis With Platelet-Rich Plasma and Hyaluronic Acid Combination Therapy: A Systematic Review

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/0363546521998010 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 036354652199801

Author(s):

Michael R. Baria ◽

W. Kelton Vasileff ◽

James Borchers ◽

Alex DiBartola ◽

David C. Flanigan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Hyaluronic Acid ◽

Combination Therapy ◽

Knee Osteoarthritis ◽

Platelet Rich Plasma ◽

Case Series ◽

Final Analysis ◽

Preparation Technique ◽

Randomized Studies ◽

Patient Reported

Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) are injectable treatments for knee osteoarthritis. The focus of previous studies has compared their efficacy against each other as monotherapy. However, a new trend of combining these 2 injections has emerged in an attempt to have a synergistic effect. Purpose: To systematically review the clinical literature examining the combined use of PRP + HA. Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using PubMed and Embase. The following search terms were used: knee osteoarthritis AND platelet rich plasma AND hyaluronic acid. The review was performed by 2 independent reviewers who applied the inclusion/exclusion criteria and independently extracted data, including methodologic scoring, PRP preparation technique, HA composition, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Results: A total of 431 articles were screened, 12 reviewed in full, and 8 included in the final analysis: 2 case series, 3 comparative, and 3 randomized studies. Average follow-up was 9 months. The modified Coleman Methodology Score was 38.13 ± 13.1 (mean ± SD). Combination therapy resulted in improved PROs in all studies. Of the comparative and randomized studies, 2 demonstrated that combination therapy was superior to HA alone. However, when PRP alone was used as the control arm (4 studies), combination therapy was not superior to PRP alone. Conclusion: Combination therapy with PRP + HA improves PROs and is superior to HA alone but is not superior to PRP alone.

Download Full-text

Assisted therapy with platelet-rich plasma for burn patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Burns ◽

10.1016/j.burns.2020.11.005 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Yu-Chien Kao ◽

Dai-Zhu Lin ◽

Sheng-Lian Lee ◽

Chiehfeng Chen ◽

Hsian-Jenn Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Platelet Rich Plasma ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Burn Patients

Download Full-text

Systematic Review: Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Platelet-Rich Plasma and Biomaterials as New Regenerative Strategies in Chronic Skin Wounds and Soft Tissue Defects

International Journal of Molecular Sciences ◽

10.3390/ijms22041538 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (4) ◽

pp. 1538 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Pietro Gentile ◽

Simone Garcovich

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Stem Cells ◽

Wound Healing ◽

Soft Tissue ◽

Chronic Wounds ◽

Platelet Rich Plasma ◽

Skin Wounds ◽

Soft Tissue Defects ◽

Chronic Skin ◽

Tissue Defects

The number of clinical trials evaluating adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and biomaterials efficacy in regenerative plastic surgery has exponentially increased during the last ten years. AD-MSCs are easily accessible from various fat depots and show intrinsic plasticity in giving rise to cell types involved in wound healing and angiogenesis. AD-MSCs have been used in the treatment of soft tissue defects and chronic wounds, employed in conjunction with a fat grafting technique or with dermal substitute scaffolds and platelet-rich plasma. In this systematic review, an overview of the current knowledge on this topic has been provided, based on existing studies and the authors’ experience. A multistep search of the PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, PreMEDLINE, Ebase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Clinicaltrials.gov, Scopus database, and Cochrane databases has been performed to identify papers on AD-MSCs, PRP, and biomaterials used in soft tissue defects and chronic wounds. Of the 2136 articles initially identified, 422 articles focusing on regenerative strategies in wound healing were selected and, consequently, only 278 articles apparently related to AD-MSC, PRP, and biomaterials were initially assessed for eligibility. Of these, 85 articles were excluded as pre-clinical, experimental, and in vitro studies. For the above-mentioned reasons, 193 articles were selected; of this amount, 121 letters, expert opinions, commentary, and editorials were removed. The remaining 72 articles, strictly regarding the use of AD-MSCs, PRP, and biomaterials in chronic skin wounds and soft tissue defects, were analyzed. The studies included had to match predetermined criteria according to the patients, intervention, comparator, outcomes, and study design (PICOS) approach. The information analyzed highlights the safety and efficacy of AD-MSCs, PRP, and biomaterials on soft tissue defects and chronic wounds, without major side effects.

Download Full-text